Tuesday, February 28, 2017

AP Exclusive: Hundreds of Texans May Have Voted Improperly

Saturday, 18 Feb 2017 09:32 AM
Newsmax


Texas election officials have acknowledged that hundreds of people were allowed to bypass the state's toughest-in-the-nation voter ID law and improperly cast ballots in the November presidential election by signing a sworn statement instead of showing a photo ID. 
The chief election officers in two of the state's largest counties are now considering whether to refer cases to local prosecutors for potential perjury charges or violations of election law. Officials in many other areas say they will simply let the mistakes go, citing widespread confusion among poll workers and voters.
The Texas law requires voters to show one of seven approved forms of identification to cast ballots. It was softened in August to allow people without a driver's license or other photo ID to sign an affidavit declaring that they have an impediment to obtaining required identification.
Even after the affidavits were introduced, voters who possess an acceptable photo ID were still required to show it at the polls.
The revelations come as President Donald Trump makes frequent claims that the nation's voting systems are vulnerable to fraud. The president has repeatedly said, without citing any evidence, that he would have won the popular vote if not for 3 million to 5 million immigrants in the country illegally who voted for his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.
An Associated Press analysis of roughly 13,500 affidavits submitted in Texas' largest counties found at least 500 instances in which voters were allowed to get around the law by signing an affidavit and never showing a photo ID, despite indicating that they possessed one.
Others used the sworn declarations to lodge protest statements against the law.
One affidavit from Hidalgo County, along the Texas-Mexico border, read: "Did not want to 'pander' to government requirement." In Tarrant County, an election judge noted on an affidavit: "Had photo ID but refused to show it."
"If we see that somebody blatantly says 'I have ID' and refused to show it, we're going to turn that over to the D.A.," said Stephen Vickers, chief deputy elections administrator for Tarrant County, which includes Fort Worth. "If they tried to use the affidavit to get around the system, yeah, I see that as a violation."
The disclosures came as top Texas Republicans cheered the case of a Mexican national who was sentenced to eight years in prison for illegal voting. Rosa Maria Ortega was convicted earlier this month on two felony counts of illegal voting over allegations she improperly cast a ballot five times between 2005 and 2014 in Tarrant County. Her attorney has said Ortega was a permanent U.S. resident who mistakenly thought she was eligible to vote.
Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, both Republicans, cited the case as proof that voter fraud is real and requires preventative measures. Abbott crowed via Twitter: "In Texas you will pay a price for Voter Fraud."
His office did not return a request for comment from the AP.
Questionable affidavits were identified in more than 20 counties around the state.
Tarrant County alone had at least two dozen. In Bexar County, home to San Antonio, the top election official estimated that a large chunk of the nearly 600 affidavits submitted should have been declined and voters instructed to cast provisional ballots instead.
Travis County, which includes Austin, identified 70 such cases out of roughly 2,300 affidavits.
In Fort Bend County, a suburb of Houston, more than 15 percent of voters who submitted 313 affidavits said they possessed a photo ID, but they were not required to show it.
Under a court order issued last year, election officials were not allowed to question a voter's reason for signing an affidavit.
The cases do not amount to voter fraud because people still had to be registered to vote to qualify for an affidavit, said John Oldham, Fort Bend County's elections chief.
Poll workers were trained to "err on the side of letting people use the affidavit instead of denying them the chance to vote," Oldham said.
"We don't consider it something that we want to go out and prosecute people over," Oldham said. "But I wish we didn't have this affidavit process. It makes the whole photo ID law entirely meaningless."
The affidavit process was adopted after an appeals court ruled that the voter ID law discriminated against minorities. The change was intended to help voters who could not obtain identification for a variety of reasons, including disability or illness, lack of transportation or conflicts with work schedules.
Nearly 9 million Texans cast ballots in the presidential election, according to state data, and Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton by more than 800,000 votes statewide. That means the hundreds of disputed ballots could never have made a difference in the outcome at the top of the ticket.
New York University's Brennan Center for Justice estimated that more than 16,000 affidavits were submitted statewide in Texas. The director of the center's voting rights and elections project said it would be difficult to prove voters intentionally tried to thwart the system by using an affidavit.
"As far as I'm concerned, these are the better part of almost 20,000 voters that would not have been able to participate in this election," Myrna Perez said. "This is just a scratch on the surface."
In August, Paxton warned that voters could be criminally prosecuted for signing an affidavit during the election if they had been issued driver's licenses or other IDs in the past. But a Paxton spokesman was far less harsh this week, saying "only local prosecutors can pursue those who perjured themselves by wrongfully voting with the reasonable impediment declaration."
There will probably be some cases forwarded to prosecutors in Texas' largest county, which includes Houston.
Stan Stanart, who oversees Harris County elections, said he believes some people who signed affidavits committed perjury and lied about forgetting their photo ID.
"I suspect there were a number of people purposely breaking the law," he said. "Can you prove it in a court? Probably not without a serious investigation or a lot of legwork."
Comment:
It seems that the Texas Registrar Of Voters felt that it was better to let some illegal aliens vote than risk denying the vote to a rightful citizen.
Under normal circumstances I would agree, but there are so many illegals about and they were all literally desperate to see that Trump was not elected that the risk of voter fraud was much greater.
If a voter ID law isn't enforced, why even have it in the first place?
There is nothing unfair about photo ID laws.  State ID cards are free.  If you have trouble with transportation surely you can work out something.  After all we're talking about one trip to the DMV, not a daily commute to an out-of-town job.
In many instances (not all) it could be a case of not wanting to be bothered going to the DMV.  After all, who likes going to the DMV?  Lots of lines, rude clerks, and wait, wait, and more wait.  But still, if that's what you have to do then that's what you have to do.  Voter fraud is real and this is what we have to do to help prevent it.
BTW, Voter ID laws are not especially unfair to non-Whites.  Non-Whites can get a state ID just as easily as a White and nowadays no DMV clerk would dare deny an ID to someone based on race.  I flat out don't believe it.  And even if it does happen, just go to a different office.  Some people are racist, but not everyone.
Dan 88!

Monday, February 27, 2017

Rock-Star Republican Ted Nugent Mulls Senate Bid

By Bill Hoffmann   |   Friday, 17 Feb 2017 12:20 PM

Image: Rock-Star Republican Ted Nugent Mulls Senate Bid

No-holds-barred rocker Ted Nugent says he may run for Senate if the GOP doesn't "get it right this time."
And if Nugent does throw his hat in the ring, it could be facing another conservative hit-maker, Kid Rock, who announced his intention to explore a possible run in Michigan.
"I'm always very interested in making my country and the great state of Michigan great again and there is nothing I wouldn't do to help in any way I possibly can," Nugent, echoing President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign slogan, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
"We the people are justifiably fed up with 'Fedzilla' and bureaucrats of every stripe," added Nugent, who said that Michigan "dodged the toxic blue bullet" on Election Day and proved the "real Michigan is bright red."
Nugent — whose hits include the hard-rocking "Cat Scratch Fever" and psychedelic tune "Journey to the Center of the Mind" — also teased a possible run in a profanity-filled post on Facebook
Nugent told The Caller that if he If he does run, his campaign slogan will be, "Make Michigan, Michigan again."
His campaign song? "Stranglehold," which tells the story of a man who feels like a "dog in heat" after his girlfriend leaves him.
Kid Rock is also being trumpeted for the U.S. Senate against longtime Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow. The musician, whose real name is Robert Ritchie, drew interest at the Michigan Republican Party convention last weekend, RollCall.com reported.
Some feel Ritchie could catch a GOP wave in the state, which sided with Trump in the 2016 election — the first time the state voted Republican in a presidential election since 1988.

Comment:

B Movie star Ronald Reagan first as governor of California, then president of the United States.  We've had pro wrestler Jesse "The Body" Ventura as governor of Michigan.  Ah-nold Schwartzenegar as governor of California and Sonny Bono as a U.S. Congressman.  Also the guy who played "Gopher" on the original "Love Boat" was also a congressman.  Why not Ted Nugent?  He can't do any worse a job than the idiots who are in office now.

However, I can't help but think that all these celebrities turning to politics - especially the more "off-the-wall" ones like Nugent aren't making America a laughing stock to the rest of the world.

Dan 88!


Sunday, February 26, 2017

Some Good Ones!







Saturday, February 25, 2017

CITIZEN LOBBYISTS ASKED CA ASSEMBLYMAN TO AUTHOR BILL

Report by Robin Hvidston


Assembly Member Jay Obernolte (R) Hesperia has introduced a great bill in Sacramento! After Stella Stephens researched the Louisiana Blue Lives Matter bill, Citizen Lobbyists met with the assemblyman and requested that a similar bill be presented in the California Legislature.

Assemblyman Jay Obernolte introduced AB 2 Hate Crimes: Peace Officer - which would make harming a peace officer a hate crime.

READ AB 2 AT THE END OF THIS EMAIL.

If you live in California, call your CA State Assembly Member and your CA State Senator and tell them to support AB 2 - which would make harming/assaulting a peace officer a hate crime. This bill would add the status as a peace officer to the list of actual or perceived characteristics necessary to determine whether a criminal act qualifies as a hate crime. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By expanding the information that law enforcement agencies report to the Department of Justice and disseminate to crime victims and the public, this bill imposes a state-mandated local program.

Find your assembly member here:

Find you senator here:


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILLNo. 2


Introduced by Assembly Member Obernolte
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Salas)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Cooper and Lackey)

December 05, 2016



An act to amend Section 422.55 of the Penal Code, relating to hate crimes.
 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST



AB 2, as introduced, Obernolte. Hate crimes: peace officers.

Existing law defines “hate crime” as a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of actual or perceived characteristics of the victim, including, among other things, race, religion, disability, and sexual orientation. Under existing law, that definition applies unless an explicit provision of law or the context clearly requires a different meaning. Existing law provides punishments for hate crimes that range from misdemeanors with specified penalties to felonies with additional terms of one to 3 years in state prison, depending on the underlying criminal act and other circumstances. Existing law requires, with conditions, the Attorney General to direct local law enforcement agencies to report specified information relative to hate crimes to the Department of Justice. Local law enforcement entities are required by existing law to provide a brochure on hate crimes to victims of these crimes and to the public, and the Department of Fair Employment and Housing is required by existing law to revise those brochures as needed and to provide those brochures to local law enforcement agencies upon request.

This bill would add the status as a peace officer to the list of actual or perceived characteristics necessary to determine whether a criminal act qualifies as a hate crime. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By expanding the information that law enforcement agencies report to the Department of Justice and disseminate to crime victims and the public, this bill imposes a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.


DIGEST KEY

Vote: majority   Appropriation: no   Fiscal Committee: yes   Local Program: yes  

BILL TEXT

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


SECTION 1.

 Section 422.55 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
 422.55.
For purposes of this title, and for purposes of all other state law unless an explicit provision of law or the context clearly requires a different meaning, the following shall apply:


(a) “Hate crime” means a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim:
(1) Disability.
(2) Gender.
(3) Nationality.
(4) Race or ethnicity.
(5) Religion.
(6) Sexual orientation.
(7) Status as a peace officer as defined in Section 830.

(8) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.


(b) “Hate crime” includes, but is not limited to, a violation of Section 422.6.


SEC. 2.


 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.

However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

Comment:

When it comes to National Socialist Revolutionaries we are in a sort of damned if you do and damned if you don't type of thing.


The police are NOT friends to NS.  In fact, I always advise any comrade that if you ever have negative contact with the police you should say the five words:  "I HAVE NOTHING TO SAY."  But you should never use violence against them.  That will either get you dead or a good long sentence in one of ZOG's Gulags.

However, if it weren't for the police, just imagine how much the non-Whites - especially gang bangers - would run amok.

Reluctantly, we need the police.  And they do put their lives on the line every time they hit the streets.  It's already a felony to strike a police officer where in the same situation it would only be a misdameanor to strike a civilian.  So why not make it a hate crime ti kill a cop?  Sounds like a good ida to me.

The only negative thing I'll say about this is this:  Regardless of the situation, I would never ever shoot at anyone that didn't try and kill me first.

Dan 88!

Friday, February 24, 2017

Study: Up to 2.1 Million Hispanics May Have Voted Illegally

Newsmax
By Jason Devaney   |   Thursday, 16 Feb 2017 01:41 PM

An analysis of a little-known study concluded there may have been more than 2 million non-citizen Hispanics who illegally voted last year.
The Washington Times cites the 2013 study, which was conducted by McLaughlin and Associates. A separate, and more recent, analysis by research nonprofit Just Facts found there was potentially a large number of non-citizens who managed to cast a vote in last fall's presidential election.
Donald Trump won the election but lost the popular vote to Democrat Hillary Clinton. He has said several times he believes voter fraud was rampant.
In the 2013 study, 13 percent of the non-citizen Hispanics said they were registered to vote.
According to the Times, James Agresti of Just Facts examined the results, applied it to 2013 U.S. Census data, and concluded that as many as 2.1 million Hispanics could have been illegally registered to vote.
"Contrary to the claims of many media outlets and so-called fact-checkers, this nationally representative scientific poll confirms that a sizable number of non-citizens in the U.S. are registered to vote," Agresti said.
It is against the law for non-citizens to register to vote in U.S. elections.
During a lunch with a bipartisan group of senators last week, Trump brought new life to the issue of voter fraud by saying he and former Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte would have won in New Hampshire if not for voters being bused in from out of state.
Some Republican lawmakers agree with Trump that at least some level of voter fraud occurred during the November election, while others aren't on the board with the idea.
Comment:
Makes a great deal of sense to me.  It would explain better how Shrillary won the popular vote while Trump creamed her with the electoral vote.  
In our highly departmentalized society, all too often one department doesn't know what the others are doing.
The popular vote would have come under the jurisdiction of the Registrar Of Voters.  The Electoral College gets its amount of votes based on figures from the Department Of Census, which does not officially count illegals.  That would explain how Clinton could get more popular vote in the same state where Trump took the electoral vote.  The Registrar Of Voters was counting whoever was registered with them - and evidently they weren't checking too closely at who was registering.  The Census Department knows who is a citizen and who is an illegal or legal resident and gave its number of electors accordingly.
Note:  The Census Department is not aware of each and every illegal in the country so in the case of these people, as far as the Census is concerned, they do not exist, therefore they don't get electors assigned to them.
It all makes sense.  We should have to show two forms of ID to register:  A state driver's licence or ID card, and a Federal ID card.  TWO forms of picture ID would reduce fraud.
I don't believe that too many citizens are unable to provide such IDs.  State IDs are free, and if we ever get a National ID system that will be free too.  National IDs could be obtained at either a court house or a local post office.  Everyone should be able to get to their local post office.  State IDs as we know come from the DMV.
Even if you live miles from a DMV office everyone can find a means to get there at least once.  How about a friend driving you?  A bus?  Uber?  It's not so expensive that it's cost prohibitive to a large number of American citizens.
If you're house bound like say due to health reasons, I have no solution to every situation, but I'm sure someone will come up with something.  Maybe in extreme cases they could come to the shut ins.
If just one percent of American citizens can't provide two forms of picture ID that doesn't mean we scrap the idea as being unconstitutional.  We can't allow voter fraud to continue simply because we might disenfranchise one percent of the population.
The needs of the many outweight the needs of the few. - Mr. Spock.
Dan 88!

Thursday, February 23, 2017

German police raids target Muslim clerics accused of spying for Turkey

Justin Huggler, Berlin 
15 FEBRUARY 2017 • 6:40PM

Police in Germany on Wednesday raided the homes of four Muslim clerics suspected of spying for Turkey.
Heiko Maas, the German justice minister, accused Turkey of using religion as cover for intelligence operations.
Police suspect the four imams used their position to spy on supporters of Fethullah Gülen, the religious leader President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accuses of being behind last year’s failed coup.
All four men are employees of Ditib, a Turkish government agency that funds mosques and provides imams for the Turkish community in Germany.
The raids come amid claims that Turkey is using Muslim clerics in more than 30 countries around the world as a “global spying network”.
The Cologne Central Mosque run by Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs DITIB, in Cologne, Germany
Last week Germany’s BfV domestic intelligence agency alleged that as many as 13 imams working for Ditib had sent lists of names of Gülen supporters in the country to the Turkish government.
Although no arrests were made in the raids, they are likely to pile further pressure on relations that are already strained by German concerns over the Turkish crackdown on opponents of Mr Erdogan following the coup attempt.
“Whoever uses Islam as a cover for espionage cannot rely on freedom of religion,” Mr Maas, the justice minister, said.
“If the suspicion that some Ditib imams were spying is confirmed, the organisation must be seen, at least in parts, as a long arm of the Turkish government.”
Ditib, or the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs is a Turkish government agency founded in 1984 to fund mosques for Germany’s Turkish community. An estimated 4 million Turks live in the country.
Historically, imams appointed by Ditib have been viewed as reliable and free from extremism. But the suspicion they are passing names of Gülen supporters to Ankara is seen as troubling in the light of the crackdown on his followers in Turkey.
A prominent Austrian MP this week alleged he has evidence that Turkey is operating a “global spying network” of clerics in 30 different countries in Europe, Africa and Asia.
Peter Pilz of the Austrian Green party claimed documents from the Turkish embassy in Vienna and consulate in Salzburg proved clerics from the Austrian equivalent of Ditib were sending reports on Gülen supporters to Ankara.
The raids come amid political anger over plans for Binali Yildirim, the Turkish prime minister, to address a rally in Germany in support of a controversial Turkish referendum.
Mr Erdogan is seeking public approval to give himself wide-ranging new executive powers in the referendum, which will be held in April.
Critics say the proposals amount to a dismantling of democratic safeguards.
Turkish citizens living in Germany are allowed to vote in the referendum and Mr Yildirim plans to address a rally of some 10,000 Turks in the town of Oberhausen on Saturday.
German opposition MPs have called for his appearance to be blocked.

Comment:

This is an excellent example of why President Trump should be allowed to ban immigration from certain Muslim countries.  At the very least people from these countries need extreme vetting before being allowed in.

When you have open borders as some idiots want, God knows who will come here and do God knows what.
The problem with many liberals is that they believe people are basically born good and learn to be bad later.  Almost any psychologist will tell you it' exactly the opposite.  People are born savages and are taught to be either civilized or barbarians.

Civilized behaviour is not an inherited faculty.  If we wiped all civilization out in one generation we'd be right back where we started.

Dan 88!

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

A Glimpse Of The Future - If We Don't Fight And Win



Comment:

This is a montage of actual hate crimes against Whites.  Some are from security cameras, but as you've probably heard, some non-Whites actually make videos of their attacks on Whites and post them on Facebook and You Tube.

Interesting thing about Facebook.  They will pull anything that promotes hate against anyone - including Whites.  But when Whites are the victims they drag their feet and take their time.  When Whites are the perps such a video wouldn't be up 24 hours.

You Tube is even slower. 

This doesn'thave to be our future - as long as we are willing to fight.  What will it take to make you fight White Man?

DISCLAIMER:  This is not a real NetFlix series.  It's just a parody.  If NetFlix has any series like this running or in the works it is purely coincidental.

Dan 88!

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

See Homeless American Citizens in Sanctuary City Santa Ana, Ca.



Comment:

Absolutely shameful!  Instead of spending money helping illegals "get a better life", they should be spending the money finding homes for all these tent dwellers.

Where the hell are people's priorities?

Dan 88!


Monday, February 20, 2017

Happy President's Day


Dan 88!

Sunday, February 19, 2017

George Washington and the Cherry Tree

There has been a recent discovery among archives shedding new information regarding George Washington's famous line "I can not tell a lie - I chopped down the Cherry Tree" It seems that someone was hiding nearby during the following discussion and copied this on parchment.

 "George, son, did you chop down the cherry tree?"

 "No, Dad."

 "Son, because I trust you and have given you the privilege of running the plantation while I'm gone as a symbol of that trust, I'm going to believe you."

Seven Months Later...

 "George, your brother was talking to one of our slaves, and the slave told him he saw you chop down that cherry tree last winter. Did you?"

 "No, Dad."

 "I think you are lying."

"No, no, no! I swear I did NOT chop down the cherry tree."

"Son, he saw you out here with your axe. Your punishment will be much worse for you if you lie. Now, tell me the truth!"

"Dad, I answered your question truthfully. Still, I must take complete responsibility for all my actions. While my answer was legally accurate, I did not volunteer information. Indeed, Dad, I did cause the cherry tree to be lying on the ground. To do this was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible. I know my answer to you gave a false impression. I misled you, my own father. I deeply regret that. I can only tell you I was motivated by many factors.

 "What I did, Dad, was use a saw to cause the cherry tree to fall. Only after the tree was already down did I go get my axe to chop off individual branches. So, I chopped off branches, but sawed down the tree. Look at the saw cut on the stump and the axe cuts on the branches. Therefore, legally, I told the truth. I ask you to turn away from the spectacle of this fallen tree and to return our attention to a solid family relationship. After all, who's going to remember a cherry tree as a symbol of my character and ability to lead?"

The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter.
Mark Twain, U.S. Author (1835-1910)

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Hungary Becomes First European Country To Ban Rothschild Banks

Neonnettle.com reports:


A kindly worded letter from Gyorgy Matolcsy, the head of Hungary’s CentralBank, asked Managing Director, Christine Lagarde of the International Misery Fund, as some have fondly nicknamed it, to close the office as it was not necessary to maintain it any longer.
The Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, seemed keen to ease off austerity measures and prove that the country could go it alone. It in fact issued its first bond in 2011, borrowing off the global markets.
Hungary borrowed €20 billion loan to avoid becoming insolvent during the economic crisis in 2008. But the debtee debtor relationship has not been smooth sailing.
Many criticised the Prime Minister as making an ill-advised decision in order to win an election, which was due in 2014. He also wanted to refrain from having too many foreign eyes on their economic policies, as many reforms were criticised as being undemocratic.
Paying the loan back early has meant Hungary have saved €11.7 million worth of interest expenses, but Gordan Bajnai, leader of the electoral alliance E14-PM, claimed that they had actually lost €44.86 million by March 2014 because of the early repayment as all they did was replace the loan from the International Mafia Federation (another nickname, we’re still talking about the IMF here) with a more expensive one, labelling the stunt as Propaganda .
And what made further nonsense; another loan at high interest rates was signed to finance a nuclear upgrade, which will mean not only higher repayments but also high electricity costs. But they do have economic sovereignty now.
Many have claimed that the IMF AKA ‘Imposing Misery and Famine’, are owned by the Rothschild group, the biggest banking group in the world, having their fingers in almost every central bank in the world. This means that not only do they make money off usurious interest rates at the misfortune of crumbling economies, they also literally own Governments and people of power – I mean they have considerable influence.
Escaping the banking clutches is therefore, iconic. Iceland joined Hungary in 2014 when it paid back its $400 million loan ahead of schedule after the collapse of the banking sector in 2008 and Russia, of course bowing down to no Western puppeteer, freed itself in 2005.
The return of these three countries to financial independence has been said to be the first time a European country has stood up to the international fund, since Germany did so in the 1930s. Greece is anxiously trying to make payments but missing them as we all stand on the sidelines routing for them to stick two fingers up to the ‘International M***** F******’.


Comment:


What this says to me is that not only is Europe fighting back against mass immigration, but are also fighting back against foreign financial control of their countries.  The dream of the globalists is crumbling all around them.  Nationalism is returning and we are winning - at least in Europe.


America has woken up to the dangers of mass immigration.  Next we have to awaken them to the dangers of foreign financial control of our country.  This won't be as easy.  People like the Rothschilds and Warburtons operate a lot more subtly.  However, if these European countries who are breaking free of the international banksters can succeed, it may inspire us to do likewise.
Time will tell.  The enemy seems to be losing control.  We may have more time than we initially thought.  But that doesn't mean we can sit back and relax.  If we do, it will give them a chance to reorganize and tighten their stranglehold on us.  We must keep up the fight.  We must resist to our last breath if necessary.
Dan 88!

Friday, February 17, 2017

The Rothschilds Admits The Creation of Israel


Lord Jacob Rothschild.  Look familiar?  Smithers, release the hounds!

[YNW] The 80-year-old Rothschild said in a recent interview that his ancestors “helped pave the way for the creation of Israel,” forcing the British government to sign the Balfour Declaration in 1917.
The Rothschilds are commonly believed to have engineered WWI and waited until 1917 when Britain showed signs of trouble. The Zionist family then promised the British Government that they could convince the US to enter the war and ensure Britain’s victory over Germany on the basis that the British government handed control of Palestine to the Zionists.
Thus the Balfour Declaration was created, which is an official letter from the British Government Foreign Secretary James Balfour to Baron Rothschild.
It states that:
“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object.”
During a television interview, the Times of Israel reports that Balfour revealed for the first time the  role of his cousin Dorothy de Rothschild.
Rothschild described Dorothy, who was in her teens at the time, as “devoted to Israel,” and said: ‘What she did, which was crucially important.’”
Rothschild said that Dorothy connected Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann to the British establishment. Dorothy “told Weizmann how to integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly.”
Rothschild said that the way the declaration was procured was extraordinary. “It was the most incredible piece of opportunism.”
“[Weizmann] gets to Balfour,” Rothschild described, “and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”
The interview was was conducted by former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub as part of the Balfour 100 project. Taub interviewed Rothschild at Waddeston Manor in Buckinghamshire, a manor bequeathed to the nation by the Rothschild family in 1957, where the Declaration is kept.
According to Ambassador Taub, the declaration “changed the course of history for the Middle East.”
The Times reports that Rothschild said his family at the time was divided on the idea of Israel, noting that some members “didn’t think it was a good thing that this national home be established there”.
Dorothy’s letters are also stored at Waddeston. They describe her later dealings with diverse Zionist leaders and her advice on the organization of the Zionist Conference, according to the Times.
Rothschild said that the Declaration went through five drafts before finally being issued on November 2, 1917.
Alison Weir reports in her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, that drafts of the declaration went back and forth to Zionists in the United States before the document was finalized. The main writer was secret Zionist Leopold Amery.
Comment:
Just a little piece of historical interest.  Most National Socialists know that the Rothchilds have played a significant role in the shaping of Western civilization, but it's nice to get some of the details.  
When you can cite a few facts, it always carries more weight than generalizations.
The ANP in addition to being a political party is also an educational organization.  Spread this one around.
Dan 88!