Cruz Target Of "Birther" Lawsuit

By Bill Hoffmann   |   Friday, 15 Jan 2016 12:46 PM

Image: Cruz's Citizenship Status Challenged in Birther Lawsuit

Sen. Ted Cruz' "birther" nightmare took a dramatic turn Friday after a Texas lawyer filed the first lawsuit challenging his eligibility to serve as president because he was born in Canada.

In court papers, attorney Newton Schwartz Sr. says he filed the action because "the U.S. Constitution is not a popularity document for fair weather only."

The lawsuit, first reported by Bloomberg, was filed in federal court in Texas Thursday and argues the question must be presented to the Supreme Court for a fair shake instead of left up to popular opinion.

"This 229-year question has never been pled, presented to or finally decided by or resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court. Only the U.S. Supreme Court can finally decide, determine judicially and settle this issue now," the lawsuit states.

"However persuasive, one finds each side in this debate, the final decision ultimately rests in the hands of five or more of nine Justices on the Supreme Court as mandated by the Constitution."

Cruz, the son of an American mother and a Cuban father, was born in Canada — a fact that Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump has gleefully made hay of in recent weeks.

Cruz's campaign insists he is eligible, but the suit argues that a United States president must be a "natural-born citizen" — a term whose definition the Supreme Court hasn't previously considered.

During Thursday's GOP debate, Cruz insisted: "Since September, the Constitution hasn't changed. But the poll numbers have. I recognize that Donald is dismayed that his poll numbers are falling in Iowa. But the facts and the law are really clear."

"Under longstanding U.S. law, the child of a U.S. citizen abroad is a natural born citizen."

Schwartz also argues that if his case is not heard, the question of Cruz's eligibility could erupt into a contested election.

The 85-year-old lawyer told Bloomberg he's not linked to any particular presidential campaign, but "probably" supports Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who is challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination.


Wait just a minute here!  I'm not a Cruz supporter.  I don't support any of them.  But doesn't this sound familiar?  It seems to me a few years a ago that there were identical accusations against Obama.  They refused to investigate.  They didn't even want to hear it.  And those who made the accusations were called racists because Obama is Black.

Well Cruz is a Mestizo (half Cuban as Obama is half Black).  Why aren't the Democrats making these accusations being called racists?  After all, if Cruz should get the Republican nomination, his Democratic opponent will be either Shrillary (White), or Sanders (Jew).  I guess Liberals can't be racists.  Only conservatives and National Socialists can.

Another example of Liberal hypocrisy.

Dan 88!


  1. Dan,
    You bring up a great point about the backwards logic of the Liberals. They are always quick to point the racism finger at others but cry when the finger is pointing at them. Democrats fear their own history, they were the party that didn't vote to "Free the Slaves" and they also didn't vote for the woman's right to vote. Doesn't sound like the same party anymore if you ask me!

    1. Those are facts they would rather you not know. They prefer to let people think they were always the champions of the oppressed.

      My father once told me that the difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans will stab you in the back. The Democrats will shake your hand, call you pal, and THEN stab you in the back!

      Dan 88!


Post a Comment