Monday, August 31, 2015

INTERVIEW WITH A GREEK HOLOCAUST DENIER

A condensed and edited version of an interview with Greek Holocaust denier Konstantinos Plevris, the first Holocaust denier in history to be tried in a court of law and found ‘Not Guilty’ — much to the anger and alarm of organized Jewry.

The full interview may be read in the Barnes Review under the title Interview with a Gutsy Greek Patriot.

Even though it is condensed, it is very long so I'm dividing it up over two days.  I will hold off making any commentary until then.

Dan 88!


LD:  Greek nationalist lawyer and self-confessed anti-Semite, Konstaninos Plevris, author ofThe Jews: The Whole Truthwas initially found guilty of inciting racial hatred against Jews in December 2007, this verdict being based entirely on outspoken quotations found in the above-mentioned 1400-page book.

Thus Plevris described Joseph Goebbels as “one of the brightest minds of the century, a philosopher with a deep understanding of mass psychology”. He called ZYKLON B gas “merely a poisonous gas used to fumigate the concentration camps … extensively publicized as the gas used to put Jews to death in special gas chambers which have not been found.” Finally, Plevris’s praise of Adolf Hitler was not appreciated by the Jews who regard Hitler as the most evil man in history—second only in infamy to Jesus Christ, of course, who is now being burned in hot excrement in hell according to the Talmud. “The tragic leader of the German Third Reich is certainly the most impressive leadership figure of the modern age,” Plevris enthuses about Hitler, adding ruefully, “He could have rid Europe of the Jews, but he did not.”

Other complaints against Plevris is that  he subscribed to “the myth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” that he characterized Jewish children in the concentration camps as “very fat and well-fed”, and that he regarded Jews as “mortal enemies” and as  “subhuman”.  (See here)

Plevris appealed the court ruling, and on the 27th of March 2009 the court of appeals overturned all charges against him. His complete exoneration by the most distinguished legal brains in Greek jurisprudence was to prompt angry charges from Jewish sources that there had been a “miscarriage of justice”.

However, it was not easy to prove that admiration of Adolf Hitler or doubts about the Holocaust could in any way equate with incitement to violence against Jews; nor that failure to love Jews or hold them in high esteem was in itself a crime.  

PETER PAPAHERAKLIS [TBR]: I am here at the home of Mr Konstantinos Plevris to interview him and learn about his beliefs. Specifically, about his very big and important book, “The Jews: The Whole Truth”, which is not yet available in English. Mr Plevris has some introductory remarks…

KONSTANINOS PLEVRIS: Three years ago, I published in Athens my book “The Jews: The Whole Truth.” (Picks up book and shows it to camera.) This is 1,400 pages long. This book is full of facts, proofs, references to 270 authors, writers, other books and of course photos. Immediately after the publication of my book, the Central Council of Jews in Greece and the European Jewish Congress started a campaign against me. They went to the prime minister of Greece asking me to be condemned. They went to the Justice Department, and, after three years of legal fights, I have finally won 100 percent in the Supreme Court of Athens. Justice prevailed; the court proved itself to be independent and not under Jewish control.

TBR:
  What do you think of the Jewish “Holocaust” hypothesis?


PLEVRIS:
 I don’t believe in the “Holocaust.” Of course many Jews died during WWII, but there is no proof the Germans planned to exterminate them.


TBR:
 We understand that you do not now believe in the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II.
But did you at any point in your life believe it?


PLEVRIS:
 No, I never believed in the “Holocaust.” That is the reason that I have examined the figures that they have given. In 1968, more than 40 years ago, I published a book on it with the title The Myth.


According to the evidence that we have, it was impossible to have killed 6 million Jews — because in all the countries that were occupied by Hitler there were only 4,200,000 Jews according to the official statistics. Even if he arrested all of them, he still could not come up with 6 million.


But Hitler never planned to kill the Jews. He only wanted to transport them to the island of Madagascar or some other place.


Anyway, almost 3,300,000 Jews have received money from West Germany in the past because they claim that they were arrested and put in concentration camps. All this is explained in detail in my book.


TBR:
 Have you ever been to Auschwitz or related sites?


PLEVRIS:
 Of course. I have been to Dachau, Auschwitz, all of them. There are no gas chambers in any of them.


TBR:
 Is it illegal in Greece to question the “Holocaust” theory?


PLEVRIS:
 No. Absolutely not. In Germany and in Austria they feel guilty for the Jews, and there it is illegal. Not here. Here we have freedom of speech. You are free to express your ideas and to state your opinion.


TBR:
 Did not the ancient Greeks almost invent freedom of speech?


PLEVRIS:
 Yes, of course. Don’t forget that here we believe in dialogue. You speak, I give my answer, and we discuss things. Many times I called on the Jews to come on my TV program to speak in a public, free dialogue, and they refused. Why? Because they know they are wrong and I am right. And it’s not only about the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II. Most of my book involves the crimes the Jews committed against the Greeks throughout history.


TBR:
 WWII was a terrible time. How many Greeks died in the war?


PLEVRIS: 
 Half a million; 520,000 to be exact.


TBR:
 What other holocausts have the Greek people survived?


PLEVRIS:
 We had the 1922 genocide in Pontus, the area around the Black Sea. Around Greece there are these states — Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey — and all these states were founded on Greek territory. They enslaved the Greek population. So, we Greeks have had genocides. Real genocides!

And no one gave us any money!

The Jewish “Holocaust” is for me an enterprise. It has an economic goal. The Jews gained money from it. Thirty years ago, I remember, it was written that 4 million Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Later, they changed this to 1 million. But the Jews collected money for 4 million.

LD:  Actually, the official figures for Holocaust victims at Auschwitz were revised downward from 4 million to 1.5 million in 1989. So it was officially admitted at that point that the figure of 2.5 million needed to be subtracted from the 6 million figure. Incredibly, no such subtraction has ever taken place. The magic 6 million figure remains unaltered. And merely to question it is an imprisonable offense in seventeen countries: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Switzerland.


Click To Enlarge


Sunday, August 30, 2015

These Guys Get An F In English








Well, at least Asians try to learn English.  That's more than can be said for a certain other ethnic group whose name I won't mention.  Aye Caramba!

Dan 88!

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Federal Government Masks Full Cost Of Illegal Immigration Surge

By Melanie Batley   |   Friday, 21 Aug 2015 10:39 AM
Image: Federal Govt Masks Full Costs of Illegal Immigrant Surge

Illegal immigrants who have entered the United States at the southern border have been resettled across the United States, but the federal government is not releasing the full costs associated with housing them, Breitbart reported.

The news outlet discovered that a Freedom of Information Act request from a pro-security group about the specific costs of housing, detaining and resettling the immigrants has been stonewalled.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) asked the government for:


The costs of building family detention centers


  • The costs of apprehending, processing and detaining unaccompanied minors

  • The costs of transporting, transferring, removing and repatriating unaccompanied minors

  • The costs related to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency's representation of the government in removal procedures involving unaccompanied minors

  • The number of instances where objections to the return of unaccompanied minors were raised by the governments of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.


According to Breitbart, the federal agency refused to answer a number of the questions and provided only partial answers to two of the five requests: the costs of transporting, transferring and removing illegal minors, and the costs of employing people to carry it out.

Those costs alone totaled $58.2 million — or four times the cost of the previous year.

"The failure to provide most of the cost information related to the surge of [unaccompanied minors] indicates that the government has either failed to properly document those costs, or is refusing to reveal them," FAIR said, according to Breitbart.

The full costs for the illegal immigrants do not take into account the costs incurred by the Department of Health and Human Services or the public education system.

"[The costs] for providing shelter, food, education, healthcare and other services likely vastly exceed additional costs incurred by ICE," FAIR said, according to Breitbart.

Data obtained by Breitbart from the Justice Department indicated that 96 percent of Central Americans caught illegally crossing into the United States last year are still in the United States.

Comment:

The government is lying to us?   I just can't believe that.  In this great democracy with freedom of speech and all that, the government would never lie.  Yeah, right.

This should be of no surprise to anyone.  We know the government has been lying for years about unemployment numbers.  They claim the unemployment rate is around seven or eight percent.  But they don't count those who are no longer on unemployment insurance because it has run out, nor do they count agricultural workers.  I never understood why.  A worker is a worker whether he's industrial or agricultural.

They also don't count small businessmen who have gone out of business because as business owners, they are not technically employed.  Self employed does not fall under the legal definition of employed.  They don't qualify for unemployment insurance, therefore they were never technically employed so they can't technically be unemployed under the legal definition of the law.

The government only tells us the truth when it is convenient for them to do so.

Dan 88!

Friday, August 28, 2015

Polish Authorities on Nazi Treasure Train Hunt: 'We Have Found Something'

By Jason Devaney   |   Wednesday, 26 Aug 2015 03:14 PM
Image: Polish Authorities on Nazi Treasure Train Hunt: 'We Have Found Something'


Authorities in Poland have confirmed that a train has been discovered that could be the so-called Nazi treasure train that has been missing since the end of World War II.

It's not clear whether the finding is the missing train, which is reported to contain gold, gems, and guns.

As legend has it, the Nazi train was allegedly loaded up in the German city of Breslau, which is now a part of Poland called Wroclaw. The train supposedly entered a tunnel near a cliff-top medieval castle, however it never emerged, as the Soviet Army approached on May 8, 1945, halting its progress.



Two men recently said they had located the train, but would not reveal its exact location until authorities guaranteed them a cut of what the haul is worth.

According to an NBC News report, a train has been located.

"The city [of Walbrzych] is full of mysterious stories because of its history," the town's deputy mayor Zygmunt Nowaczyk said, reports NBC. "Now it is formal information — [we] have found something."


Local government press officer Arkadiusz Golebiewski confirmed, according to NBC, that a military train has been found in Walbrzych — a city in Poland's southwest corner near the Czech Republic.

A BBC report claims the train could be holding 150 meters long and may be carrying up to 300 tons of gold.

The Nazis are rumored to have constructed underground military installations linked together via tunnels in order to hide from allied forces during World War II.

"The train contains valuable objects, costly industrial materials and precious metal ores" the men who allegedly found the train wrote in their proposal.

Comment:

Most of the gold that NS Germany had was stolen by the Soviet Union. However I'm sure it's possible that they missed something.  There's probably still stuff out there that hasn't been found yet.

If you found something like that what would you do?

a. Try and keep all of it.

b. Turn all of it in.

c.  Hide a small, but valuable portion and turn the rest in.

If it were me, I'd pick "c".  It would be almost impossible to hide 300 tons of gold from the authorities.  I'd settle for hiding a couple of hundred pounds and turn the rest in.  I'd wait awhile for the attention to die down, then sell it off in small amounts discreetly.  It's better to be satisfied with a smaller, reasonable amount, than risk everything to try and keep it all. Greed is destructive and has led to many a person's downfall.

Dan 88!

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Trump Kicks Journalist Out Of Press Conference

You may remember that the Mexican TV network "Univision" breached a contract with Trump and refused to air the Miss World and Miss Universe Pageants (Trump owns both) because of his comments about Mexican illegal aliens.  Trump is suing for breach of contract.  Litigation is still pending.  Trump will win.  You cannot commit breach of contract because someone insulted you.

At a press conference on Aug. 25, Trump was taking questions from journalists IN TURN.  Right in the middle of things a journalist from Univision stands up OUT OF TURN and starts demanding Trump answer his questions.  Long story short, he was thrown out on his ear.  LMWAO!

Here's the video of it:  




Like I've said, I don't like or trust Donald Dump, nor do I endorse him, but I do admire how he speaks his mind regardless of what the PC bunch says about him.  At least he's got a backbone, unlike most other politicians or politician wannabees.  

Dan 88!

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

More Good News! - Oil Can Go as Low as $10 a Barrel!!

By A Gary Shilling   |   Thursday, 20 Aug 2015 07:40 AM
Image: Oil Can Go as Low as $10 a Barrel

In February, I predicted that crude oil prices would drop to $10 to $20 a barrel. At the time, the price of West Texas Intermediate was $54, down from $74 in November, when OPEC decided not to cut production in order to forestall further price erosion. And that was way down from the June 2014 price of $107.

The price did fall further — to $43 in mid-March. But then the market bulls argued that oil was underpriced and headed for about $80, which was the global average cost to produce a barrel of oil. A rebound followed as bargain hunters rushed in. U.S. exploration and production firms raised about $11 billion in new equity this year.

The oil optimists noted that earlier high oil prices, aided by low financing costs, had pushed up production, especially among U.S. frackers. Low prices, they reasoned, would curb production, especially since fracked wells tend to be short- lived and the cost of drilling new ones exceeded the depressed prices. But a funny thing happened on the way to $80 oil: The rally stopped dead in its tracks at about $60 in May and June, then slid to the current $42, a new low.

Me? I'm sticking with my forecast of $10 to $20 a barrel. The logic behind that February projection still seems valid. Cartels exist to keep prices above equilibrium. But that encourages cheating, as cartel members want more than their allotted share and outsiders sell more to take advantage of the artificially elevated price. So the job of the cartel leader -- in OPEC's case, Saudi Arabia — is to cut its production to accommodate the cheaters and prevent a price collapse. The Saudis had been doing that for decades, and as a result, OPEC production over the last 10 years has been flat, with all the growth instead enjoyed by non-OPEC producers, including U.S. frackers and Canadian oil-sands companies.

The Saudis got tired of seeing their market share shift to others, so they and the other financially strong Persian Gulf producers decided to play a high-level game of chicken. They figured, in that Nov. 27 OPEC meeting, that they could withstand low oil prices longer than the cheaters. So they effectively abandoned quotas. OPEC production last month was 31.5 million barrels a day, the highest since May 2012 and up 1.5 million barrels a day from the previous ceiling. The Saudis themselves are producing a record 10.35 million barrels a day.

In this war, the chicken-out price isn't what's needed to meet budget requirements, which ranges between $40 a barrel in Kuwait and $125 a barrel in Venezuela. It isn't the cost of drilling, pipeline laying and other overhead expenses, either. No, it's the marginal cost of getting the oil out of the ground once the wells are drilled, the pipelines laid and the overhead covered. It's the price at which cash flow for an additional barrel drops to zero. In Texas's Permian Basin and in the Persian Gulf, the marginal cost is $10 to $20 a barrel, and even lower for some Saudi oil fields.

As long as prices exceed marginal cost, more (not less) production is encouraged to make up for lost revenue. Some producers will raise output even at prices below marginal costs. Russia depends on energy exports to cover import costs and government spending. With the collapse in oil prices and Western sanctions, Russia is desperate for anything that will earn foreign exchange. 

Even bankruptcies, such as KKR's planned filing for Samson Resources Corp., won't reduce output. In bankruptcy, highly leveraged companies shed their debt service, which lowers operating costs. KKR's 2011 buyout of Samson left it with $3.6 billion in debt.

Meanwhile, all-in costs for U.S. fracking continue to plummet. OPEC believes that many projects in North Dakota are profitable at $24 to $41 a barrel. Lots of forecasters were deceived by the drop in working U.S. oil rigs, which fell from 1,931 in September 2014 to 1,917 last November to 884 in mid- August. Old vertical drilling rigs were taken out of service while the remaining horizontal drillers produced more wells per rig. Anadarko Petroleum says it could double the number of wells it can drill per rig in some areas. Devon Energy and Whiting Petroleum, the biggest shale producers in North Dakota, produced record amounts of oil in the second quarter.

Iran is another price-depressing factor. It could step up output quickly, by about 1 million barrels a day, if Congress approves the deal curtailing its nuclear program and sanctions are lifted. Around 500,000 barrels a day would be available almost instantly from Iranian oil stored in floating tankers.

OPEC estimates that in the second quarter, global oil output exceeded demand by 2.87 million barrels a day, and it expects U.S. output to rise almost 1 million barrels a day this year and another 320,000 barrels a day in 2016. The International Energy Agency expects falling production in Russia to hold the non-OPEC output increase to 1.1 million barrels a day compared with 2.4 million barrels last year. The IEA looks for global demand to rise 1.6 million barrels a day this year and 1.4 million in 2016.

Still, worldwide supply would exceed demand by more than 1 million barrels a day next year. And the demand projections by IEA and even lower forecasts by OPEC do not factor in slower growth in China and other emerging markets, the nosedive in Chinese stocks, and the devaluation of the yuan. Collapsing oil prices are clearly deflationary. In a future column, I'll discuss the effects of the decline on the U.S. Federal Reserve's timetable for raising interest rates and the implications of lower oil prices on producers, their financial backers and consumers.

Comment:

Now I'm not expert, but I do know a little about economics and how Judeo-Capitalism operates.  It's always smart to understand your enemy.  But it seems to me that falling oil prices are a good thing - for the 99 percent.

The only ones that it's bad for are the One Percent.  Poor, rich babies!  I feel so sorry for them that their profits are falling - NOT!

They'll survive.  They always do.  And in the end they always come out richer than before so I'm not shedding a single tear for them.

It's about time we benefited from the system - even if it is only temporary.  When it comes to finances, I'll take whatever benefits I can get regardless of how temporary it is.  Don't worry, when this little price drop "crisis" is over with, they'll be making more money than ever and we'll be screwed again - as usual.

Dan 88!

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

A Jew Admits Birthright Citizenship Is "Bizarre"

By Jason Devaney   |   Tuesday, 18 Aug 2015 08:01 PM


Image: Alan Dershowitz: Birthright Citizenship Is 'Bizarre'


Birthright citizenship is a "bizarre way of defining citizenship," Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz tells Newsmax, but he thinks it's unlikely the Constitution will be changed.

During an appearance on Newsmax TV's  "Newsmax Prime," Dershowitz tells host J.D. Hayworth the law "doesn't make a lot of sense."

"It means that somebody from far flung corners of the earth happens to be born while his mother or her mother is making a stopover at JFK Airport and never again returns to America, has no connection to America, is a citizen," Dershowitz says. "It doesn't make a lot of sense logically, but it's in our Constitution and it would be impossible to amend the Constitution to change that, so we're going to stick with that for better or worse."



Constitutional attorney Betsy McCaughey, who served as the Lt. Governor of New York from 1995-1998, would like to see the United States begin a push to change the rule.

"It's a na├»ve concept in this day and age with air travel, as Alan points out that anybody who's born here or whether they sneak across the border or they happen to be visiting for the day, and suddenly their child is a citizen of the United States," McCaughey says. 

"And let me point out that almost every industrialized, modern, civilized country in the world has abolished birthright citizenship, including Australia, France, England, countries with which we identify in many ways. Only the United States and Canada, of all the civilized developed countries, still have it. We should make a move to change this."


The issue of birthright citizenship is defined in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment as, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has taken issue with the law, saying he would like to see children of illegal immigrants born in the U.S. not be considered citizens. 

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican and another White House hopeful, wants to see the practice end as well. 

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, also a member of the GOP field running for president, countered both men and affirmed Tuesday he supports birthright citizenship

The debate over birthright citizenship reminds Dershowitz of former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who was born in what is now the Czech Republic.

"Anybody born in the United States, even if they're there for 15 minutes, not only is a citizen but has a right to run for president in the United States," Dershowitz says. 

"Whereas a person who came when he or she was six months old and is one of the most loyal possible Americans — Madeleine Albright comes to mind — can't run for president of the United States, there is something quite bizarre about that but history, the accidents of history are often quite bizarre."

Comment:

Very few people today know the purpose for the 14th Amendment.  Back in the day, slaves and Native Americans were not considered American citizens.  If an Indian wanted to leave the reservation, he had to become a citizen just like an immigrant.  The 14th Amendment was established so their children, and the children of freed slaves, as well as LEGAL immigrants did not have to go through the naturalization process when they came of age.  It was never intended to be taken advantage of by illegal immigrants.

Of course if you went back in time and said to people the words "illegal immigrants", they were likely to give you a blank stare because they might not know what you were talking about.  

Some might even say, "What's an illegal immigrant?  An immigrant that's robbed a bank or something?"

There are many liberals that want to ban guns saying the 2nd Amendment is an obsolete holdover from the early years of this country and has no relevance today.  Using the same line of thinking, the 14th Amendment is an obsolete holdover from the 19th Century and has little relevance today.  It's about high time we did something about it - not necessarily remove it from the Constitution, but it has to be significantly altered so that illegal aliens and people on visitor's visas can't have their children here and have them be American citizens. That is not what the writers of the amendment intended.

Dan 88!

Monday, August 24, 2015

Good News - For A Change!



Comment:

As I've said numerous times, our European brothers and sisters are light years ahead of us in their efforts.  That's because they willing to actually take action.  We can do the same here, but it won't happen by itself.  WE have to make it happen.

I'm not talking about a return to the Third Reich.  Those times are gone and will never return.  We have to make a FOURTH Reich - a Reich for the 21st Century.

Dan 88!

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Only In America...

1. Only in America......can a pizza get to your house faster than an ambulance.


2. Only in America......are there handicap parking places in front of a skating rink.



3. Only in America......do drugstores make the sick walk all the way to the back of the store to get their prescriptions while healthy people can buy cigarettes at the front.



4. Only in America......do people order double cheese burgers, large fries, and a diet Coke.



5. Only in America......do banks leave both doors to the vault open and then chain the pens to the counters.



6. Only in America......do we leave cars worth thousands of dollars in the driveway and put our useless junk in the garage.



7. Only in America......do we use answering machines to screen calls and then have call waiting so we won't miss a call from someone we didn't want to talk to in the first place.



8. Only in America......do we buy hot dogs in packages of ten and buns in packages of eight.



9. Only in America......do we use the word 'politics' to describe the process so well: Poli' in Latin meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'.



10. Only in America......do they have drive-up ATM machines with Braille lettering.

Dan 88!

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Federal Court Strikes Down DHS Rule Permitting Foreign Labor to Compete With American Workers

PR Newswire, August 14, 2015

WASHINGTONAug. 12, 2015 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of an American tech workers union that brought a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulation that permits non-student foreign labor to compete with American workers. The court struck the rule, finding that DHS did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when it bypassed the public notice and comment process mandated by the APA. The court also rejected DHS's assertion that American workers do not have standing to sue when the government implements a rule that increases the potential for more competition in their job market. 
The case, Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. USDHS (Civil Action No. 14-529), was brought by the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) on behalf of several displaced American technology workers. In the case, the Administration argued that American workers who could not show that a specific foreign former student took their job were no more than disgruntled taxpayers who had no rights the government would consider or protect. District Judge Ellen Huvelle disagreed. Judge Huvelle also found that there was no tech worker or fiscal emergency when DHS suddenly expanded the Optional Practical Training program in 2008, even as the US economy headed into a major recession. By circumventing the APA notice-and-comment procedure, she observed that DHS had improperly considered only the desires of Bill Gates of Microsoft and other "interested stakeholders" from multinational corporations.
On the minus side, the court found that the key word "student" in the immigration code is "ambiguous" and deferred to the agency's interpretation that includes those not attending school. The court also blamed Congress for having "acquiesced" when executive action expanded the student visa program in order to circumvent the "cap" on H-1B workers. The court remanded the matter to the agency and gave it time to issue a new rule. This time, however, the public will have the opportunity to comment on any proposed rule.
Dale L. Wilcox, IRLI's Executive Director, commented, "The jobs of millions of American college graduates and tech workers still remain at risk as the Obama Administration is likely to revive this job stealing rule. American workers must unite and let their voices be heard in the APA comment process." Wilcox continued, "I hope that hardworking Americans across the nation will take heart and renew the fight to protect the citizen workforce. IRLI will continue the fight in court for American workers and hold the Obama  Administration accountable to the rule of law."  
Comment:
It's about high time someone held Obama accountable to the rule of law.  He seems to think he's above it.
One of the things I think is going on with Obama is he's tired of our system of checks and balances getting in the way of getting things done, so he just goes ahead and does them anyway.  The problem is that that makes him nothing more than a dictator.   The system of checks and balances was designed to PREVENT a dictatorship - no matter how benevolent said dictator thinks he is.    
Someone once said that there is no such thing as a benevolent dictatorship.  A dictatorship in and of itself is wrong, and the principle of a "gentle" dictator is false.

However, I can't totally agree with that.  Hitler was a "good" dictator.  He did more than anyone else ever did for his people.  But considering the state of things in this country, one can hardly call Obama a "good" dictator.  He is an unmitigated disaster.  Not that his successor will be any better (just different), but we only have to put up with him for another 17 months.  That's going to be a long 17 months.
Personally I hope the Republicans win the presidency.  I know they will fail, just like Obama. I'm hoping that when they do fail (and we know they will), it will really wake people up.  Right now the people are starting to wake up, but they're still drowsy.  They need another failure in the White House to fully get the sleep out of their eyes (and brains).
Dan 88!

Friday, August 21, 2015

Thursday's Demonstration

I keep talking about how we should attend various grassroots events if we should agree with the position of those sponsoring them.  I have to watch my finances, but when there's such an event in my area, I try and attend.

Last Thursday such an event was held in San Bernardino in front of Congressman Pete Aguilar's brand new office (built at taxpayer expense, of course).

As you can tell from the name, Aguilar is a Mestizo.  He was born in this country, but his parents were immigrants - illegal immigrants who got their green cards in the last big amnesty during Emperor Bush's reign.  


Therefore it will be no surprise when I tell you he supports open borders, amnesty for all illegals, medicaid for illegals, and sanctuary cities.   


BTW, is San Bernardino a sanctuary city?  Yes and no.  No, it is not officially a sanctuary city, but one third of the Mestizo population are illegals.  Seventy percent of the general population are Latinos, so do the math.  Overall, approximately 20 percent of the population are illegals, so even if San Bernardino is not officially a sanctuary city, for all intents and purposes it acts as though it is. 

He is also pro-abortion, yet he calls himself a good Catholic.  How hypocritical.  The Catholic Church is adamantly anti-abortion.  As I've said before the Catholic Church is NOT a democracy in any form.  Catholics are required to conform to Vatican edicts and if they don't like it they can leave the church.  You can't pick and choose which things you'll agree with and which you won't, so how can Aguilar have the gall to call himself a good Catholic?


Anyway, the demonstration began at 5:00 PM.  I was late getting off work so I didn't have time to go home and change.  I came straight from my job.

We had a surprising amount of supporters.  So many in fact that they turned on the sprinklers to "dampen" our enthusiasm.  How do I know it was deliberate.  It was after 5:00 PM.  Because of the drought, business and government buildings are now only allowed by law to water their lawns for 15 minutes on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM.  It was 5:30 PM on a Wednesday, so they turned on the sprinklers hoping to get rid of us.  It's going to backfire on them.  Someone videotaped their sprinklers being used on the wrong day at the wrong time.  A complaint will be filed with the appropriate agency.  The fine for a first time violation is $5000.  I doubt they'll try that the next time we're there.

As Aguilar was holding an open house because of his new office facility, we were able to get inside. 

We weren't there more than a few minutes when this aging hippie comes in and says to one of the staff members, "You know there are a bunch of crazy racists protesting outside."

The guy said, "I don't know that they are racists, but we do know there are protesters out front."

Then I said to the guy, "They're not only outside, but they're in here too!"

He asks, "Where?"

I replied, "You're talking to one."

You should have seen his face turn red.  He shut his mouth after putting his foot in it. LMAO!

Some of us got a chance to actually talk to the congressman.  I'm sure everything that was said went in one ear and out the other.  Once Aguilar publicly stated he felt it was his duty to serve the Latino community because there are not enough Whites in the area to be bothered with.  When asked about the Black community he refused to answer.

What gets me is how openly racist he is about it, and no one says a word against him.  Yet if a White congressman said it was his duty to serve the White community he would be tarred and feathered.

He also had a private meeting with a representative from the Mexican Consulate.  We saw him leave the building, and drive away in a car with consular licence plates.

Overall, I don't think we accomplished much, but the point is I and others were out there making an effort.  If no one is willing to even try, nothing will change, so if there is an event near you, attend. At least you can say you tried.  If we are going to lose, let's at least go out fighting on our feet, and not on our backs.  What's it going to be White Man?


These are the folks who didn't mind being photographed.  Many were afraid of things like getting fired if their bosses found out, so they opted not to be photographed.  I'm in this picture.  Guess which one is me.

Car with Mexican Consular licence plates.  Below is a close up of what such a plate looks like.  The plate on the above car is a consular plate without a doubt.


This Spanish language literature instructing illegals on how to deal with immigration authorities was left in Aguilar's office (with his consent) by the consular representative.

Dan 88!



Thursday, August 20, 2015

Two Cents Worth

$113,000,000,000 a year is spent on illegals and their gangs, they kill over 10,000 Americans each year and if you lined them up, they would stretch 8,900 miles. It would take you over 6 days without stopping going 60MPH to get past them.

Deport 15,000,000 illegals. It can be done, those who resist are traitors and ignorant and should go with them:

1. Hire 200,000 veterans starting at $50,000 per year = $10,000,000,000 per year. (CA pays $22,000,000,000 per year to support them.) Double this for processing and expense and this would be $20,000,000,000 a year for 6.25 years.

2. If each ONE deported JUST ONE ILLEGAL per month, that would be 2,400,000 per year deported.
 
3.This would take 6 years and 4 months and cost $125,000,000,000, For deporting them and the anchor kids. (They are not citizens, the 14th Amendment was for freed slaves to be citizens.)

4. So it would cost $125,000,000,000 and save in the long run. They would multiply to 45,000,000+ in 20 years. After they are deported, in less than 7 years, these veterans can then be employed by ICE and, the double of the expenses (above) would decrease and they could get a pension.

5. the prisons would not be crowded, no there would not be more for profit.

6. the schools would not be crowded. 

7. there would be billions save on welfare.

8. savings in housing.

9. better education in schools.

10. Less losses from crimes.

11. 10,0000+ American lives would be saved each year.

12. less traffic.
 
13. less births of low sub-standard people.

14. the standard of living would rise.

15. employment for teenagers and low skilled workers, the illegals only work hard at reproducing.

16. happier minorities (by being employed).
 
17. higher wages.
 
18. a higher standard of living.
 
19. a better economy. 

That is my two cents!

Comment:

One of our comrades in Texas sent this to me.  He doesn't know who wrote it, but whoever did is talking sense. I wish I had said this.  Then again, I probably will! LOL

Dan 88!

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Israel is paying internet workers to manipulate online content



Comment:


As many of you may have suspected, Israel is paying and training internet bloggers to delete, rewrite, and revise internet content to shape public opinion to Israel's benefit. Video of the Israeli-sponsored training programs have been leaked to the web (like the video here). 

Additionally, investigative reporters that infiltrated these groups have reported that Israelis are being trained to spread disinformation and to try to create conflicts among different religious, racial, and ethnic groups if it would benefit Israel. Some of the seminars also encouraged the workers to spread disinformation on the internet and to attempt to recruit free (unpaid) labor. For example, many of these bloggers have been trained to attempt to make friends with you by pretending that they share an interest in your favorite sports team or movie, or that they went to the same school, but they will ultimately try to recruit you to attack other groups or individuals that Israel thinks is against its national interests (e.g., 'Muslims,' 'Russians,' 'Germans,' 'Latinos,' 'United Nations representatives' and 'human rights groups'). 

Others have been trained to personally attack, stalk, and harass anyone personally that does not agree with Israel. Not only is this type of behavior a terrible injustice to the accuracy of content (it's actually state-sponsored propaganda), it is also damaging to the public trust because people are being misguided into working as unpaid servants of a government through false pretenses. 


People really need to speak out about this.

Dan 88!

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

California Governor signs bill banning ‘alien' from state labor code

BY ALEJANDRA MOLINA / STAFF WRITER