Saturday, February 28, 2015

Al Sharpton, Cable Giants Hit With $20B Discrimination Suit

Tuesday, 24 Feb 2015 07:15 AM
By Elliot Jager

Image: Al Sharpton, Cable Giants Hit With $20B Discrimination Suit

Cable giants Comcast and Time Warner — along with Al Sharpton — are being sued  by the National Association of African-American Owned Media (NAAAOM) for discrimination. 

Comcast and Time Warner recently announced they were merging. The complaint charges that the companies effectively bought protection from Sharpton and other black advocacy groups against possible claims of racial discrimination, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The association recently sued AT&T and DirecTV for discrimination, and described its mission as promoting "the economic inclusion of truly 100 percent African-American owned media," according to a press release.

NAAAOM is run by Mark DeVitre, who also serves as its general counsel. He is a former lawyer for Warner Brothers. It is joined in the lawsuit by Entertainment Studios Networks founded by Byron Allen. DeVitre previously served as general counsel for Entertainment Studios

The racial discrimination lawsuit, filed in California, is for $20 billion. It alleges that despite billions of dollars in investments, The Africa Channel is the single channel carried by the companies that is black owned.

NAAAOM charges that Sharpton's National Action Network received donations of some $3.8 million from the cable companies. In effect, the companies paid Sharpton, the suit claims, to say that Comcast business dealings met standards of diversity. 

The suit further charges that voluntary diversity understandings between other African-American advocacy groups and Comcast were "a sham, undertaken to whitewash Comcast's discriminatory business practices."

The NAAAOM filing charges that despite "notoriously low ratings," Sharpton was kept on as host of his MSNBC program in return for "continued public support for Comcast on issues of diversity," according to the Reporter.

Comcast told the Reporter that it was disappointed NAAAOM "decided to file a frivolous lawsuit." The cable company said it was "proud" of its record fostering diverse programming, including from "African-American owned and controlled cable channels."

It said that it carried "multiple networks owned or controlled by minorities."

Sharpton's group told the Reporter that it was ready to defend its relationship with the cable companies.

"As for Rev. Sharpton's TV show ratings the numbers are clear. Rev. Sharpton's show has the highest ratings of any 6 p.m. show in the history of the network," the National Action Network said.


I have a question.  Just how many channels are Black owned?  Let's face it, with a few exceptions like Turner, they are Jew owned.  How can cable companies be penalized for not airing Black owned channels when most are Jew owned along with a few a Aryan owned?  They can't air a channel that doesn't exist.

It's like complaining that there are not enough Black teachers.  Statistics show that only eight percent of Black college graduates become teachers. They can't hire people that don't exist.

I'm sure there are several Black owned local TV stations, but they have to be big enough to make it profitable to air them on cable.  In reality, Judeo-Capitalists are the most colourblind of all.  They don't see White, Black, Brown, or Yellow.  They only see green.

If you are a Black person who owns a TV station, if it's profitable for cable to air it then they are going to air it.  They will not air some rinky-dink small town TV station just because they need to air more Black TV stations whether it's profitable or not.  Judeo-Capitalists don't care about race.  They only care about money.

FYI:  Disney Corporation (including the Disney Channel) is controlled by Robert Iger, CEO - a Jew. Ironically, Walt Disney hated Jews, and was considered a Nazi sympathizer.  This was satirized on "The Simpsons" with the character Roger Myers Sr. who created Itchy and Scratchy.  Myers even made a documentary entitled "Nazi Supermen Are Our Superiors".

Dan 88!

Friday, February 27, 2015

Swastikas displayed outside Calif. house upset neighbors

Associated Press February 25, 2015

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A Northern California man's display of poster-size swastikas outside his Sacramento house is upsetting some neighbors and state lawmakers, who plan to call on him to remove them.
The symbols used by German Nazis in World War II replace stars in one American and two Israeli flags. There is also a Palestinian flag and a statue made of wood of a figure raising its arms and dressed in army green. The display also includes Christmas lights to illuminate it at night.
Sacramento Police Spokesman Officer Justin Brown said Wednesday police received a call about the house in the River Park neighborhood on Monday and after doing a welfare check found there were no reportable crimes.
"We haven't received any other complaints," Brown said.
Democratic Sen. Marty Block of San Diego said a news conference with lawmakers, veterans and community leaders will be held Thursday to call on the house owner to voluntarily remove the swastikas.
Block, chair of the Jewish Caucus, called the display "an insult" to the American soldiers killed and wounded fighting Adolf Hitler's Nazi army and the millions who died in German concentration camps.
"It's an insult to the memory of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers who died fighting people wearing swastikas and for the 6 million people who died a horrible death in concentration camps," Block said. Most of those who perished in the camps were Jews.
KCRA-TV first reported about the display on Tuesday and tried to talk to the house resident but he refused to be interviewed.
Robbie Rose, who lives nearby, told KCRA-TV he has thought about taking down the swastikas himself.
"How do I explain this to my little one?" asked Rose. "I am all for freedom of speech, but this is just too much. I really do want to get out of my car and rip that down. But the only reason I don't (is) because I do believe in being a good American, and I do believe in freedom of speech."
At least Mr. Rose accepts that this is a matter of free speech.  That's encouraging.
However, I don't see how this will benefit our cause.  Quite the reverse.  It's only going to make people think we're all a bunch of nuts.
Whoever is responsible for this is probably some nut job loner who is just looking for a little attention. He's probably hoping that the state or the city will try and force him to remove the Swastikas so he can cause a big brouhaha and sue in court and make some money if he wins.  
Every now and again I get a visitor on this blog from Sacramento.  If it is the person who put up the Swastikas, my advice to you is to take them down before anyone tries to force you.  You are not helping.
BTW, I promise everyone that I'm not the one who did this.  Sacramento is 450 miles from the San Bernardino area.
Dan 88!

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Businesses Running From California

By Michael Reagan
Maybe Oklahoma was just loaning the residents who fled to California during the 1930s Dust Bowl. (The Dust Bowl, incidentally, was a genuine weather crisis that went away without expensive government regulation regarding the size of dust motes, how far one could travel each day over dry ground and airborne water interdiction. One could say the climate changed and for the better.)
Another California company has announced it’s pulling up stakes. After 103 years in the Los Angeles area, Farmer Brothers coffee is heading east for either Oklahoma City or Dallas–Fort Worth.
Farmer Brothers has a different business model from that of Starbucks. Farmer Brothers doesn’t hire recent gender studies graduates to serve as caffeine bartenders in an environment of leftist ambiance. Instead the company sells coffee without ideology to other beverage resellers. 
Farmer Brothers, which began selling coffee door–to–door and grew into a nationwide presence, joins Toyota and Nissan as another high–profile company driven out by storms of rules, regulations, and costs whipped up by gale–force political demagoguery. Along with the company and its prestige, California will lose 350 jobs, with paychecks ranging between $40,000 and $80,000, it can’t spare.
In the short run, the move will be expensive. According to the Los Angeles Business Journal, “Farmer Bros. expects to incur roughly $35 million to $40 million in new facility costs with an additional $20 million to $25 million in anticipated capital expenditures for machinery, equipment, furniture and other necessities.”
Some of that cost theoretically will be covered by the sale of the company’s Torrance headquarters. But I have my doubts. Not many firms are moving into California and finding a local company ready to endure the Golden State’s punishing gauntlet of regulations, regulators and assorted red tape could be tough.
Still, once the move is complete and the company is up and running in the Sooner state or the Lone Star state it expects to save $12 to $15 million annually over what it would cost to operate in California. Now that’s a sunny business climate.
The response on the part of California officials is typical: Farmer Brothers was unhappy about being taxed and micromanaged by politicians and bureaucrats with no business experience? Well no one told us!
Maybe not — instead the company voted with its feet, just as residents have been doing for decades. California has had a net outward population migration that’s bleeding the middle class dry. Now it appears business is moving to greener pastures, too.
FYI, Farmer Brothers is a middle man company who also produces a brand with their name on it purchased from a wholesale outfit so you have no idea where the coffee you're drinking really comes from.  Hawaii? Jamaica? The Middle East?  Narnia?  Who knows. 
Anyway, California is taxing itself to death.  Even so, the state still spends $1.50 for every $1 it takes in.  In others words, for every $1.50 California spends, 50 cents is on credit.  California does not seem to know how to live within their means.
Partially it's because of our over burdened social programs due to high immigration and non-White population.  Let's face it, poor non-Whites do seem to be more willing to run down to social services and get welfare more than poor Whites are.
The following is a little story I read in a college text book.
A social worker was in a Black ghetto in Chicago interviewing children.  She was asking them what they wanted to do when they grew up.  She got a lot of the standard answers from the kids such as doctor, lawyer, astronaut.  But when she asked a particular Black little girl of about seven what she wanted to do when she grew up the child said, "I want to draw."
Puzzled, the social worker asked, "Draw what?"
The child replied, "I want to draw welfare like my mama.  She gets paid NOT to work."
What we have here is a failure to teach any kind of a work ethic at all. Then again, how can you teach a work ethic when neither you nor your spouse work and don't even want to?  
Anyway, although I'm certainly no friend to Judeo-Capitalists, we have to be realists.  If a state imposes too many taxes on big business, they'll simply move their operations to a cheaper state - and take all their jobs with them.  They'll put their entire payroll on unemployment and they won't lose a wink of sleep over it.  That's simply the reality of the situation.  
We have to balance a fair amount of taxation, just short of making them want to pull up stakes and move elsewhere.  If California doesn't do this, our private sector jobs will all move to places like Boise, Id. or Manchester, NH. and we'll be SOL.
The only other alternative is to do what NS Germany did.  They imposed a "Flight Tax" on companies that wanted to move out of the country to save money.  This Flight Tax made it cheaper to stay and that's what most of them did.  Of course if the Nazis did it, then it must be evil and cannot be done here in The Land Of Liberty And Justice. 
Liberty and justice for whom?  Certainly not for the Working and Middle Classes.
Dan 88!

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Proud to be White

Comrades I wish I could take credit for this but I can’t.  A friend of mine forwarded this to me in an email, and it was forwarded to him.  I have no idea who the author is.

Dan 88!

Proud To Be White

By Anonymous

I have been wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other race is......

 Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a  good point. 

This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in  his comedy act. 

 He makes some very interesting points... 

 Someone finally said it.

 How many are actually paying attention to this? 

There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab  Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans..

You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. 

 You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honky,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'...

 And that's OK... 

But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink ..

You call me a racist. 

You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you.... 

So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? 

You have the United Negro College Fund.

You have Martin Luther King Day. 

You have Black History Month. 

You have Cesar Chavez Day. 

You have Yom Hashoah. 

You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi. 

You have the NAACP. 

You have BET.... 

If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists. 

 If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists. 
 If we had White History Month, we'd be racists. 

If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.

 We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of  Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. 

I Wonder who pays for that?

A White woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant,  but any color can be in the Miss America pageant. 

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships...You know we'd be racists. 

There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the U.S … Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college. 

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. 

If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists. 

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. 

But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists. 

You rob us, car jack us, and shoot at us. 

But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist. 

I am proud......But you call me a racist. 

Why is it that only whites can be racists??

BE PROUD TO BE WHITE! It's not a crime YET....But it’s getting very close!

Tuesday, February 24, 2015



Raymondville Prison Riot

MCALLEN, Texas — Illegal aliens rioting in a private prison near the Texas border have left the prison in uninhabitable conditions, forcing federal authorities to move inmates to other facilities.
The riot broke out earlier this week when 2,000 prisoners at the MTC private prison in Raymondville refused to go have breakfast and subsequently refused their work detail. As Breitbart Texas previously reported, the inmates then broke out into the outside areas of the prison and began ripping up tents and setting fires around the facilities.
The rioting resulted in two guards and three inmates being injured. Federal officials confirmed to Breitbart Texas that their injuries were not serious. The U.S. Bureau of Prisons also confirmed that the injuries to guards and inmates were not significant.
Several state, local, and federal agencies were dispatched to the location to help set up perimeter security while they worked to bring the riot to a peaceful resolution, according to a prepared statement from the FBI to Breitbart Texas. The FBI took over command of the situation since the prison is under federal contract with the government to house federal detainees.
In the aftermath of the riot, the U.S. Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was notified by MTC that the prison is in an uninhabitable condition due to the damage caused by the inmates, a prepared statement from the BOP revealed. MTC also asked for their help in moving the inmates to other facilities.
For most of the coming week, MTC and the BOP will be moving all of the 2,800 inmates out of the damaged facility, the BOP statement revealed.
Since last year, a shift in immigration routes led to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens coming through South Texas, rapidly creating a problem for federal authorities and courts, who have had to focus primarily on illegal entry cases that have overwhelmed their detention facilities. However, as Breitbart Texas previously reported, rather than being a quest for the American Dream, Mexican drug cartels have turned it into a nightmare.
First of all, I assume these creatures have been convicted of other crimes such as drugs or robberies, and were not just being detained because they were illegals.  You don't need to detain them more than a day or two for simply being an illegal alien.  They should ship their asses back ASAP.

Secondly, this might not have happened if this weren't a private-for-profit prison.  The corporations who run these places expect to make a profit.  The only way to do that is to cut back on quality of food, space, security, and everything else required to run a prison properly.  Privatization of prisons may save the government money in the short term, but in the long it will cost them money.  Most governments can't or won't see this.  They would pass up a dollar to pick up a dime.  After all there is the old saying that you get what you pay for.  

If this prison was run properly, this wouldn't have happened - and if it did it would have been stopped before anyone got killed.  I'm not sticking up for government prisons, mind you.  I'm just saying that if a prison is to work, it must be run properly.  This one wasn't.

I think we should use the NS German prison camp system.  It didn't cost that much to build and maintain, the inmates were treated as decently as the wartime economy allowed, and security was excellent.  The worst incident the Germans had to deal with was the great escape from Sobibor.  600 inmates staged a mass escape.  About 400 were killed in the attempt, and over 100 were recaptured within a week.  

Modern prisons in America can't boast of the overall low escape rate of the camps in NS Germany.  Of course that system was invented by the evil Nazis.  Of course the government won't use that system even if it is the best way.  Typical government thinking.

Dan 88!

Monday, February 23, 2015

Missouri Lt. Governor Says He Can't Survive On $86,000 A Year!

AP - February 19, 2015

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder is asking lawmakers to give him a daily expense allowance for working at the state Capitol.

Kinder, a Republican, lives in Cape Girardeau and maintains a second home in Jefferson City.
He receives an annual salary of about $86,000. But Kinder said he's experienced "gradual impoverishment" during his decade in office, because he's had to use personal funds to pay for housing and meals when working in Jefferson City.
Kinder's salary is less than other statewide executive officials but well more than the $36,000 that legislators receive. He has asked members of the House and Senate budget panels to insert a per diem for him in the 2016 state budget that takes effect in July.
One of the lieutenant governor's duties is to preside over the Senate. Kinder said wants to receive the same allowance that legislators get, which is $103 a day. He's seeking a per diem whenever he's in Jefferson City, not just when the Legislature meets, because he also serves on various executive branch boards and commissions.
"I am situated exactly as members of the Legislature are, in living in a district community and maintaining some kind of residence when I'm here," Kinder said.
Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, said he thought it was odd that the lieutenant governor does not get a per diem, since he's required to preside over the Senate. Schaefer said senators would look into providing him one.
A per diem (pay-per-day) would enhance Kinder's pay by thousands of dollars a year, but the exact amount would depend on how many days he works in Jefferson City.
Missouri's governor is provided a house in Jefferson City. But none of Missouri's other executive officials are provided housing, and none has asked for a per diem.
Maybe he could qualify for welfare, or maybe some medicaid?  I'd sure hate to see him miss a tuition payment to his kids' fancy private school.  It would be just terrible if they had to attend public school like the rest of us.
As someone who lives on less than $23,000 a year (the poverty level) I find it difficult to sympathize with anyone who lives above it yet says "they aren't making it."  If you can't make it on $86,000, then you're living too high.  You need to cut back.  Sell your house and buy a cheaper one.  Sell your Mercedes and buy a Ford Escort.  Skip the trips to Hawaii and go someplace less expensive - or better yet, don't go anywhere at all.  Take a "stay-cation" at home.  Stop eating out and eat at home.  
There, I just solved his financial crisis.  Wasn't that simple?  
The problem with our leaders is that they feel they are entitled to special treatment.  That because of their position, they are somehow better than us and the rules that apply to the citizens do not apply to them.  If he manages to get more money out of his state then he is damn well cheating the people.

When a leader cheats the people, it is tantamount to treason.  And we all know what should be done with traitors.
A blindfold and last cigarette Mr.Kinder?
Dan 88!

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Parking Tickets

My wife and I went into town and visited a shop. When we came out, there was a cop writing out a parking ticket. We went up to him and I said, "Come on man, how about giving a senior citizen a break?" He ignored us and continued writing the ticket. I called him an "a**hole." He glared at me and started writing another ticket for having worn-out tires. So my wife called him a "s*ithead."  He finished the second ticket and put it on the windshield with the first.
Then he started writing more tickets. This went on for about 20 minutes. The more we abused him, the more tickets he wrote. He finally finished, sneered at us and walked away. Just then our bus arrived, and we got on it and went home. We always look for cars with Obama stickers. We try to have a little fun each day now that we're retired. Dan 88!

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Big Govt Obamacare Means Big Premiums

By Michael Reagan
The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy defines “you’ve made your bed, now lie in it” as an “expression commonly used as a response to people who have been complaining about problems they have brought on themselves.”
It’s a perfect response to Obamacare complaints from Democrat Reps. Lloyd Doggett, Sander Levin and Jim McDermott. The Associated Press describes them as, “Three senior House members . . . [who] worked to help steer Obama's law through rancorous congressional debates from 2009-2010.”
Now the three complaining congressman are whining about the impact Obamacare’s mandatory insurance requirement will have on their constituents. The mandatory requirement that was a centerpiece of the law that even Nancy “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it” Pelosi knew about before the vote.
The Associated Press (AP) describes the progressive Obamacare fine scale, “For 2014, the fine was the greater of $95 per person or 1 percent of household income above the threshold for filing taxes. That fine will be collected when taxpayers file their 2014 returns. But this year the fine will jump to the greater of 2 percent of income or $325. By 2016, the average fine will be about $1,100, based on government figures.”
H&R Block estimates approximately 4 million people will be forced to pay a fine for being uninsured. And Doggett, Levin, and McDermott assume these same voters will be angry with Democrats. And why not? Before, the main idea behind not having health insurance was it was free.
Now, thanks to Obamacare, not having insurance gets you fined. But without the mandatory requirement Obamacare collapses under its own weight, because unless big government forces the healthy young to buy health insurance, creating a larger base on which to spread the cost, the premiums will be so high no one can afford health insurance.
So the idealism of health care for everyone in actual practice becomes the IRS coercion of buy health insurance or be fined. The solution for these Democrats is yet another Obamacare deadline extension.
So taxpayers who’ve been in a coma for the last three years, not realizing no insurance means a fine applies to them, can sign up after they pay their taxes — which is long past the original deadline.
Everyone but the federal government is familiar with the concept of pay as you go. Now Democrats have introduced a new legal concept: Legislate as you go. Pass a bill so unwieldy, complex, and oppressive that it requires constant revision and tinkering to save the public from some of its malignant effects.
Then each time leftist Democrats revise the bad law they originally passed they can claim they are fighting for you.
I love it when Liberals do something that comes back and bites them on the ass.  It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.  Maybe I shouldn't say that.  After all it's a little bit like Schande Freude.  That's a German expression that means shameful joy. It's taking pleasure from something bad happening to someone you dislike.  
But still, the liberals make it so easy.  What's even worse is not only do they screw up like everyone else, they usually refuse to admit it.  They just keep on going in the same direction and "hope it all works out eventually".
The reason I feel I can say these things is because we KNOW that National Socialism works.  It worked so well that the Judeo-Capitalists and Judeo-Communists felt they had to do whatever it took to destroy it.  But they only partially succeeded.  National Socialism LIVES!  It lives through the ANP.
If you want to see that it has another chance to show the world it CAN work then become an Official Supporter today.  If you are already an Official Supporter then continue the good work.  That includes keeping up with your monthly pledges.  I hate to sound like all we care about is money, but without funding there is very little we can do to help you to help yourselves.
Dan 88!

Friday, February 20, 2015

N.Y. Woman Barred From Kuwait Airways for Israeli Passport


A New York Jewish woman has filed a discrimination lawsuit against Kuwait Airways after she was barred from boarding a flight because she has an Israeli passport.
Iris Eliazarov came to the United States when she was 11, has lived here for 15 years and has a Green Card, the Daily Forward reported.
Eliazarov and her husband David Nektalov, a U.S. citizen, bought tickets from a travel agent for a Nov. 1 Kuwait Airways flight from New York to London.
But when Eliazarov showed her Israeli passport at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport, she was not allowed to board the plane. A Kuwaiti law prohibits Israeli citizens from flying on Kuwait's flagship airline, the New York Daily News reported.
Nektalov was permitted to board the flight, but his wife, who is pregnant with her fifth child, had to buy a ticket on another airline.
Her suit maintains that the airline's policy violates state and federal civil rights laws.
A lawyer representing the airline said the suit has no merit because the policy is based on citizenship, and a Muslim with an Israeli passport would also be barred from flying on Kuwait Airways.
"He then had the audacity to compare the policy of Kuwait a country saved from Iraqi invasion by U.S. troops in 1991 to the U.S. prohibition on doing business with companies in Iran," the Daily News observed.
Nektalov told the News: "I didn't think discrimination like this could exist in America, in New York City. If they want to operate here they have to obey our laws."
This story is not really all that relevant to National Socialism in America, but considering who it is about I thought it would be interesting.  I do have a few points I'd like to make.
First, Kuwait considers Israel an enemy.  It's not uncommon for a country to ban enemies of the state from using their airlines or entering their country, for that matter.   This is the main reason the United States hasn't had a declared war since WW II.  If the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were declared wars, the TSA could ban Iraqi and Afganhi citizens from boarding.  Iraqi and Afghani citizens could be prevented from entering the country and could be subject to deportation.  At this time of extreme political correctness, that's a can of worms the government simply does not want to open.
Second, Kuwait does NOT owe the United States ANYTHING for "SAVING" them from Saddam back in the 1990's.  We weren't there to save the people of Kuwait, we were there to make certain their oil stayed in American control, make no mistake about it. There was no altruism involved.  It was nothing more than business.  Well maybe a little altruism on the side for some good PR, but the main purpose was to keep the Kuwaiti oil flowing to the United States.
Third, the woman's husband, David Nektalov is a Jew of Russian ancestry.  That shows Kuwait Airways barred his wife from boarding because she is an Israeli, not because she's a Jew.  Remember, not all Israelis are Jews.  Israel is home to not only Jews, but Muslims and Christians as well.  However, I doubt this will keep the airline from losing the case.  You know the way things are in this country.  The courts wouldn't dare decide in favor of the airlines.  If they did, every Jewish and left wing group wouldn't stop until any judge involved was off the bench.
A decision against Kuwait Airways would not prevent them from barring Israeli citizens in Kuwait, or in any other country that would permit this policy to continue.  There are quite a few countries that would allow this because they have similar practices.  There are many others who wouldn't care one way or another.
Dan 88! 

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Aryanism and Nationalism Return To Europe; Jews Are Afraid

McClatchy Foreign Staff (TNS)
BERLIN — Eighty years ago, Jael Botsch-Fitterling’s parents decided something was very wrong in Germany, the nation they called home. Adolf Hitler had just named himself Fuhrer, and anti-Semitism was becoming national law. Her parents and other relatives packed up and fled.
Because of that move, six years later she was born in Jerusalem in what was then Palestine. When she was 7, the land beneath her feet became Israel, making her one of the original Jews in a new Jewish homeland. All because her parents had sensed in time that Germany was becoming very dangerous for Jews.
Then, in the 1950s, they trusted their instincts again and returned to Germany. Botsch-Fitterling has never left.
But today, since the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks in Paris, she’s been thinking about that first decision to leave — thinking about it quite a bit, in fact.
The Charlie Hebdo attacks ended in a bloodbath inside a Jewish market in Paris with four Jewish men dead. And there’d been other attacks: In 2012, a “lone wolf” killed three students and a teacher at a Jewish school in Toulouse, France; last May, an attacker with links to the Islamic State group killed four people at the entrance to the Jewish Museum in Brussels.
Botsch-Fitterling finds the pattern deeply distressing.
“I love my life in Berlin,” she said. “I love my home, and my children and grandchildren are here. But we can’t escape history. I just wonder, as I look around Europe today, about those who stayed until it was too late the last time.”
Others also wonder if there will again come a time when Jews won’t be able to remain in Europe. It isn’t an idle concern. Even before the Jan. 7-9 attacks in Paris, there were signs of rising hostility.
A 2013 European Union survey of “those who consider themselves to be Jews” in eight nations found that two-thirds said anti-Semitism was “a very big” or “fairly big” problem. In France and Hungary, half those questioned said it was a very big problem. And a quarter of all respondents said they were discriminated against within the previous 12 months because of their religion.
The report described a broad range of anti-Semitic acts such as graffiti and the desecration of Jewish cemeteries and monuments. There are many examples. This week in Belgium there were reports of the miniature brick Holocaust memorials known as “stumble stones” being defaced. Over New Year’s Eve in Berlin, a 26-year-old Israeli man was beaten and spat upon after filming a group of young men singing anti-Semitic songs on the subway.
More Jews appear to be fleeing France. Studies indicate that out of a total population of about 400,000, more than 10,000 Jews left France in 2014; 7,000 of those moved to Israel.
Even before the Paris attacks, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls expressed concerns about the Jewish exodus. “If 100,000 Jews leave, France will no longer be France. The French Republic will be judged a failure,” he told Atlantic magazine.
It’s not just radical Islamists fueling the worry. Also growing is right-wing extremism that many fear attracts anti-Semites: the National Front in France, the United Kingdom Independence Party and Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West in Germany.
In the United Kingdom, the assistant commissioner for counterterrorism announced that security would be strengthened at Jewish institutions.
Of all places, Berlin may be a bright spot for European Jews. Hitler’s “final solution,” in which 6 million Jews were killed, wiped out Berlin’s thriving Jewish community in the 1930s and 1940s. Today, however, 17,000 Israeli citizens, by official count, live in the city.
Unofficially, Jewish leaders say the number is closer to 30,000 — and growing. Official German statistics for the most recent year available, 2013, show 2,700 Israeli arrivals, a record.
Those numbers could rise. Deidre Berger, director of the Berlin office the American Jewish Committee, said that despite history, there is a reason for the trend. Germany has done a better job than other European nations of protecting Jewish life. It starts, she said, with a German intelligence community that very actively tracks anti-Semitic threats.
But that doesn’t mean Berger is sanguine when she considers the 5,000 mostly young Europeans who have gone to Syria to fight for the Islamic State group and other terrorist organizations or the hundreds who have returned.
“The threat to European Jews appears to be spreading,” she said. “This requires a more active government response, across the continent.”
Her counterpart in the American Jewish Committee’s Paris office, Simone Rodan-Benzaquen, said she hopes the Charlie Hebdo attacks were a wake-up call for European governments. She said that while too many young Muslims in and around Paris, Marseille and other French cities drifted toward the radical, violent fringe, the French did not counter the message.
In Berlin, Botsch-Fitterling admits it’s all been unnerving. Only once before in the 45 years she’s lived in her apartment in southwest Berlin has she pondered moving back to Israel. That was in the 1980s, when she sensed an increase in anti-Semitism. She believes she was “one insult away” from leaving.
“I am thinking about it again,” she said, surrounded by the books she loves, above the crowded street she loves, in the apartment she loves.


Europe is undergoing a new awakening.  However, America continues to be a sleeping giant. There are some indications that it is beginning to stir, but  I just hope that we don't hit the snooze button again.

There is one down side to the Jews fleeing Europe:  Those that don't go to Israel will end up here in the United States.  That could either hinder an American awakening, or spur it on. There's really no way to tell at this point.  Right now, all we can hope is that it's the latter.

I've said this many times, but when it comes to this sort of thing Europe always seems to be one step ahead of us.  I think that's because Americans have had it too good for too long. We have been lulled into a state of contentful apathy by Jewish inspired materialism perpetrated by Judeo-Capitalism. We've always been more prosperous, and our inflation lower.  

Back in the 1970's, Great Britain was already paying the equivalent of $4.00 a gallon for gas, while we were still less than one dollar.

My mom used to work in a drug store near to the prestigious Claremont Colleges.  These are Ivy League schools that not only attract students nationwide, but worldwide as well.  She retired in the 1990's, but she used to tell me that students from Europe were utterly amazed at not only how cheap things were here, but how much we have on our shelves in the way of selection.  She said they told her that we have so many choices in American stores it's hard for them at first to figure out what brands to buy.  

But this is now changing.  Thanks to Judeo-Capitalist greed, prices continue to skyrocket, and our lifestyle continues to sink.  Sooner or later the sh*t is going to hit the fan.  It's not a question of "if", but "when".

When it does happen, the ANP will be here to offer people a choice.  Hopefully the people will choose a new system, rather than try and rebuild the old one.  That's why it is so important for us to be here for them.  If the see no viable options, they'll simply rebuild the old system because they won't know what else to do.

I urge everyone out there to be a part of the new system NOW!  Don't wait, become an Official Supporter today.  That way, when things do collapse, you'll be able to say, "I'm glad I did", rather than, "I wish I had".

Dan 88!