Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Happy Halloween!


What's Halloween without everyone's favourite monster Mr. William Henry Pratt AKA Boris Karloff?!

Dan 88!

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

The Origins Of Halloween

October is almost over. What does that mean? Cooler weather, Autumn, and of course, Halloween. But what are the origins of this semi-holiday? Halloween is one of the few holidays of completely White origin, relatively uncontaminated by other races and cultures.

Halloween is actually an abbreviation of a Catholic term: All Hallow's Eve. It precedes the Catholic Holy Day of All Saints Day. This is a day when practising Catholics are required to attend Mass. But the origins of Halloween go back many centuries before Christianity.

The day we observe as Halloween originated in the British Isles among the Celtic peoples. They called it the Feast Of Samhain (pronounced sow-WEN in Gaelic). Samhain was the Celtic ruler of the Underworld. On this night, Samhain would open the gates of the Underworld, and spirits, both good and evil would walk the Earth. It was a night of masques and balefires when anything was possible and nothing was quite as it seemed.

If people had to go out on this night, they wore masques so that if they encountered an evil spirit, it would think that they were one of them and leave them alone. Jack-O-Lanterns were carved and lit to frighten evil spirits away. However, interestingly enough, pumpkins were not used. The pumpkin is a New World vegetable, and the ancient Celts had no knowledge of them. Other gourd type vegetables such as turnips and squash were used.

They also lit bale fires and would make sacrifices of animals, and sometimes humans to welcome the return of the dead.

As time passed, and pagan beliefs were replaced by Christian Doctrine, and many of the old Celtic traditions went the way of the dinosaur. Some were turned into days of pure amusement, such as Halloween. Now the masques are used by children to get candy from their neighbours, instead of frightening evil spirits away. The same with Jack-O-Lanterns. Images of Samhain have been replaced by that of the Devil, witches, ghosts, and goblins.

A few Christian denominations consider Halloween the Devil's day, and they take it very seriously. In reality, it is not Satanic, but a pagan festival which no one takes seriously any longer. It's a night of fun to be enjoyed by all. Happy Halloween everyone!

Dan 88!

Monday, October 29, 2012

Weird News


Colorado Street Bridge, Pasadena, California

F. J. Lennon

I compiled most of this information on the bridge at Huntington Library in Pasadena, California.  They have a number of folders locked in a case that detail the entire history of the bridge.  You can’t take any of this material out of the library, or copy it, but you can, under supervision, study it.  It’s a hodgepodge of information that goes back a century.  Time periods overlap.  There is no real order to it.  But I did find interesting information that I began to piece together.


1913

1915

 Today

  • Pre-dating the bridge—actually pre-dating the arrival  of the Spanish missionaries in the late 1700s—there was a Gabriellino Shoshone Indian camp on the site where the bridge now stands.  I found a report confirming that.  It appears the camp migrated to where San Gabriel Mission now stands when the missionaries arrived.  I’ve often wondered if there’s a link between Native American shamanism and the negative energy of the bridge.  Maybe there’s a curse on that land.  I touch upon this in Devil's Gate.   
  • A hundred years after the Indians inhabited that land, an industrialist fromChicago named James W. Scoville bought the land and built a large home.  He had a dam and a pump house built to irrigate his orange and avocado groves.  You can still see remnants of this pump house beneath the bridge.  After moving West to Pasadena, Scoville was one of the early trustees of Throop Polytechnic, which went on to become Caltech.  Scoville was a major philanthropist.  He lived where the bridge now stands with his family during the 1880s.  He died in 1893.  Upon further research, I learned that Scoville was distantly related to three American presidents, and is part of one of the Illuminati bloodlines. 
 Scoville home and dam pump house (1880s)

  • The bridge was built in 1913.  Trouble began almost immediately.  On August 1, 1913, a crew was pouring concrete into the forms when the segment they were working on dropped out.  They tumbled down the side of the canyon with all the wreckage landing on top of them.  Many men were seriously injured.  At least one died—John Visco.  Two more might have died a few days later.  I haven't been able to find the original newspapers in the archives to verify that. There's a urban legend that a worker was poured into the concrete, but, based on my research, that's not true.  
  • The first suicide occurred in 1915.  After that, the floodgates opened.  I personally counted 144 suicides in the newspaper accounts, but I think the actual number is over 200.  The greatest rate  of suicides occurred during the great depression.  I documented ninety-five suicides between 1920 and 1937; there were a dozen in 1935 alone.  That was the most suicides to occur in a single year.  Shortly after the depression, an ugly, tall barbed-wire fence was installed around the perimeter of the bridge, but that didn’t stop people from jumping.  Jumpers still found ways to get up and over the barrier.  There are periods of time when the suicides wane, but they never cease.  
  • There has been only one survivor.  On May 1, 1937, a despondent woman went to the bridge, threw her three-year-old daughter over the side, then jumped.  The mother was found dead below.  But inexplicably, the police found the little girl wandering around near her mother’s body.  Amazingly, the little girl had no broken bones.  No major injuries.   The police speculated that tree limbs broke the little girl’s fall.  I found a newspaper interview with this woman from 1976.  In the interview she claims that “angels carried her down.” That statement stuck with me as I wrote the book.
  •  I find it interesting that no one ever jumps off the 134 freeway bridge  that runs alongside the Colorado Street Bridge.  It’s equally high and much easier to jump from.  But no one ever does.  They only jump off Colorado Street Bridge.  Weird.
D      Comment      
         
        The  first  city I lived  in when I first  got to  California was  Pasadena.  I've been over this 
        bridge  many  times.   It  really  is  very  high.   As  to  anything  supernatural,  I  have  no 
        personal knowledge.  Sorry about the uneven lines in my commentary.    Maybe it's just
        because of Halloween!

        Dan 88!


Sunday, October 28, 2012

Who Elects The President?


As the election is just a little more than a week away, I thought this would be a good time to explain something that the average American knows very little about.  If you think that now - or at any time that the people of this country actually decide who becomes  the president then read on.  We have NEVER decided who holds the highest office in the land.

This country needs a different, better system than Judeo-Capitalism. We need National Socialism. We need every White working and middle class person to get behind us. We need your support. Things are bad and are getting worse, and we're not the only ones saying it. The current system doesn't look out for you, the 99%. It looks out for the 1% that controls the money.

One man, one vote? Don't make me laugh. I hope everyone realizes that you, the People don't even elect the president at all. The president is chosen by the Electoral College.  The so-called popular vote, which is what we vote in basically tells our state's members of the Electoral College how they SHOULD cast their votes. But here's the thing. They are under no obligation to cast their votes the way we want them to. They can vote for whichever candidate they want, or should I say whichever candidate they are PAID to vote for. Who pays them? Take a good guess. If you said the Judeo-Capitalists, then you go to the head of the class. We don't even have the right to select our own electors.  That is done by the state government.

How many of you are aware that Abraham Lincoln, perhaps the most beloved president LOST the popular vote? He sure did. But the Electoral College went against the will of the People and voted for him anyway. Okay, I agree that it all worked out for the best, but that's not the point. The people wanted Douglas, and that's who they should have elected.

Those with the most have always controlled the elections. In Ancient Greece and Rome it was those with the most land. Today, any kind of wealth makes you a mover and shaker. How much of one you are depends on how much you have. The more you have, the more you are. The less you have, the less you are.

Comrades, the popular vote for president is nothing more of an opinion poll, disguised as a real election, to make the People THINK they are deciding on who our next president will be. Don't kid yourselves. In reality, you have no more say over who the next president will be than your dog does.

Dan 88!

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Woman 'Set Herself On Fire In Staged KKK Attack'


A woman who told police she had been subjected to a racist attack in which three men set her alight and scrawled KKK on her car was lying, according to US investigators.

"The wounds were self-inflicted," said Kyle Hanrahan, a spokesman for the FBI's Louisiana bureau.

Sharmeka Moffitt, 20, was seriously burned in the fire and remains in a critical condition.
She called police from a park in the town of Winnsboro on Sunday night and told them three men in white hoodies had doused her with a flammable liquid and ignited it.

The letters KKK, for the white supremacist organisation Ku Klux Klan, and a racial slur were scrawled on her car in what appeared to be toothpaste.

According to local media, investigators decided the burns were self-inflicted after finding Ms Moffitt's fingerprints on a cigarette lighter and lighter fluid.

Louisiana's KATC News reported her family had issued a statement saying: "Our family is devastated to learn the circumstances surrounding our daughter's injuries.

"While this was not the resolution we had expected, it is a resolution, and we appreciate the thorough investigation by the local and state police as well as federal agencies.

"We are sincerely sorry for any problems this may have caused and wish to express our appreciation for the outpouring of love, prayers and support we have received from friends, acquaintances, church organisations and government officials."

The FBI was called in to assist local authorities because the apparent attack was initially considered a possible hate crime.

Comment:

This reminds me of the Jewish college student who left threatening racist messages and Swastikas pinned up on her dorm's bulletin board directed at herself.  She too was exposed as a lying fraud.

The question is why are things like this happening?  The primary reason is that as times get tougher, National Socialism is gaining in popularity and this worries many non-Whites.  Well I have news for them.  Some of them have rather swelled heads because they think we are all fixated on "stopping them".  Stopping them from what?  Getting good jobs?  Well naturally we want our own people to have the best jobs, but after that, I don't object to them working and earning decent pay - as long as our Folk are taken care of first.

So many of them think we hate them all.  Well I can't speak for every other Aryan, but I don't hate anyone.  I say live and let live.  Just stay out of my face, thank you.

Also civil rights work is an obsession to some of them.  I often wondered what people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would do if all racism and injustice ended completely tomorrow.  Personally, I think that would destroy them.  Without their civil rights work, some of them would be totally lost and without a purpose.  They wouldn't know what to do with themselves.  In reality, Sharpton and Jackson NEED racism or else they would have no purpose so it is in their best interest to keep it alive and well and if they can't find any racism to fight they'll invent it as necessary.

Of course this woman could simply be some kind of a nut.  After all, what sane person sets themselves on fire regardless of the reason?  Just plain kooky.  Then again we have weirdos on BOTH sides of the racial fence now don't we?

Again thanks to my old friend Talmud Hater for sending this to me.

Dan 88!

Friday, October 26, 2012

The History Of Money


Money makes the world go around.  These days, money is God.  The bottom line is always money.  It wasn't always so.  Before money, we used the barter system.  We traded something for something.  

Then, in Ancient Mesopotamia, someone got the idea of using something small and valuable, such as precious gems and metals to pay for goods and services instead of bartering.  This was the beginning of the monetary system as we know it.  It was also the beginning of greed as we know it.

Real wealth comes not just from possessing money, but from controlling it as well.  Here's the problem.  If money is simply a nugget of gold or silver, or a diamond or emerald, how does someone control it?  Simple!  Through the government, back then it was the king, an official currency was issued.  That could simply mean a piece of gold or silver with the king's seal or face on it.  No other gold or silver could be used unless it had those marks on it, and if you control how many pieces of gold, silver, or copper are made,  then you control all the money, even if you don't actually possess it all!

The next step is to make different pieces worth different amounts, to make them easier to trade with.  Also, it would be a good idea to make them all look unique to the kingdom you live in, and accept no "foreign" currency, or accept it, but at a lesser value.  This would be the beginning of coinage.  Now you've tightened your hold even more.

The Ancient Jews

For a long time the Jews had been called upon to pay their temple tax with a special coin called the shekel. It was a measured half ounce of pure silver with no image on it, only a mark to differentiate between the shekel, and the half shekel.

It was to them the only coin acceptable to their religion.

These coins were extremely limited in number, and was the ONLY form of payment the Synagogue accepted (Jews still have to pay to get into the Synagogue).

But because there was only a limited number of these coins in circulation, those who owned these coins could charge almost anything they wanted, and those who wanted to go to Synagogue had no choice but to buy them.  They used trade goods, or other currencies such as the drachma to buy shekels. 

These "money changers" made huge profits with their monopoly on these coins. Once money is accepted as a form of exchange, those who produce, loan out and manipulate the quantity of money are obviously in a very strong position. 

THE BEGINNING OF BANKING

The early origins of banking and investing can be traced back to Medieval Europe and the goldsmith.  As the blacksmith works with iron, goldsmiths work with gold, making jewelry, gold eating utensils and decorations for the wealthy, and making coins for the kingdom.

Many of what we might now call middle class people owned some gold, but many had no secure place to keep it.  The goldsmith, who worked with gold on a daily basis did.  So, for a small fee, the goldsmith would keep your gold in his safe, and issue you a receipt for the value of your gold.  

Then someone realized, that when he needed to buy something, he did not necessarily have to go and get his gold from the goldsmith.  He could just give the merchant he wanted to buy something  the receipt, and the merchant could get the gold from the goldsmith himself.  This is the very beginning of buying by check.

Now after awhile, goldsmiths began to realize that very seldom did many people come to his smithy and demand the return of their gold all at once.  They usually had a good supply of other people's gold in their vaults at all times.  At first, they bought things for themselves with other people's gold, figuring they could put it back later with profits from another business venture.  It worked like a charm.  So they figured that if they could do it for themselves, they could do it for others - for a price.  At first, they charged "borrowers" a flat fee.  Later, they charged more, the longer the borrower took to repay the loan.  This was the beginning of interest.

Today banks are allowed to loan out at least ten times the amount of money they actually are holding, so while you wonder how they get rich charging you 11%, 12% or whatever amount of interest, it's not 11% a year they make on that amount but actually 110%. 

THE TALLY STICKS (1100 - 1854)

King Henry I produced sticks of polished wood, with notches cut along one edge to signify the denominations. The stick was then split full length so each piece still had a record of the notches.

The King kept one half for proof against counterfeiting, and then spent the other half into the market place where it would continue to circulate as money.

Because only Tally Sticks were accepted by Henry for payment of taxes, there was a built in demand for them, which gave people confidence to accept these as money.

He could have used anything really, so long as the people agreed it had value, and his willingness to accept these sticks as legal tender made it easy for the people to agree. Money is only as valuable as peoples faith in it, and without that faith even today's money is just paper.

The Tally Stick system worked really well for 726 years. It was the most successful form of currency in recent history and the British Empire was actually built under the Tally Stick system, but how is it that most of us are not aware of its existence?

Perhaps the fact that in 1694 the Bank of England at its formation attacked the Tally Stick System gives us a clue as to why most of us have never heard of them. They realized it was money outside the power of the money changers, (the very thing King Henry had intended). 

The Bank Of England destroyed the Tally Stick System by attacking it as unreliable, because the sticks, in and of themselves were just pieces of wood.  After all, how could a piece of wood be worth more than gold? 

After the people's faith in the Tally Sticks was shaken, and the people started to return to the use of gold, the Bank Of England suppressed as much knowledge of the system as they could.  Soon, it was all but forgotten.

Ironically enough, the first investors in the Bank Of England bought their shares with Tally Sticks, then abolished the system completely.

These investors, who's names were kept secret, were meant to invest one and a quarter million pounds, but only three quarters of a million was received when it was chartered in 1694.

It then began to lend out many times more than it had in reserve, collecting interest on the lot.

This is not something you could just impose on people without preparation. The money changers needed to created the climate to make the formation of this private concern seem acceptable.

With King Henry VIII relaxing the Usury Laws in the 1500's, the money changers flooded the market with their gold and silver coins becoming richer by the minute.

The English Revolution of 1642 was financed by the money changers backing Oliver Cromwell's successful attempt to purge the parliament and kill King Charles. What followed was 50 years of costly wars. Costly to those fighting them and profitable to those financing them. 

Now these wars left England in a financial mess.  To get back on its feet, England had to borrow money from - guess who?  The Bank Of England, naturally.  Now the Bank Of England could produce all the money they wanted, even though it was technically illegal to do so.  Also, when the government borrowed their own money from the B of E, the loans were secured by public tax money.

Any of this sound familiar?  It should.  It's still going on today, courtesy of the Middle Eastern Wars, and the Federal Reserve Bank.

Here's something really incredible.  Because the way the system works, if the government did find a way to pay off the debt, the result would be that there would be no bonds to back the currency, so to pay the debt would be to kill the currency.  In other words, the Judeo-Capitalist system could not work without massive debts.

THE ROTHSCHILDS (1743)

A goldsmith named Amshall Moses Bower opened a counting house in Frankfurt Germany in 1743. He placed a Roman eagle on a red shield over the door prompting people to call his shop the Red Shield Firm pronounced in German as "Rothschild".  That's actually pronounnced Roth Shild, rather than Roths Child.

Bower's son changed the family name to Rothschild to help hide their Jewishness.  

Amshall Bower was rather a small thinker, in business terms.  He preferred to have a small, local financial mini-kingdom.  That changed with his son Moses, who changed his first name to Manfred.  Now it was the Manfred Rothschild family.

Once Manfred got the hang of running his father's business, he trained his own sons as well.  He helped them start their own banking businesses in Amsterdam, London, Paris, Rome, and Munich.  These banks became very successful, and behind the scenes, Manfred Rothschild was pulling the strings.

THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION 

Now many people believe that the government of England did not want to let the Colonies become independent.  This is not true.  It was the Bank Of England that was resisting American independence.  The B of E had many investments in the Colonies, as did the British government itself.  England had so many outstanding loans to the B of E, that they were dependent on tax revenues from the Colonies to pay the interest on their loans.

In a way, England had no choice but to refuse America it's independence.  Without American tax money, their loans would be called in.  The B of E wanted their interest payments, plus they didn't want to lose their private investments in this country.  So, as with all other wars, American Minutemen died, not for political reasons, but for financial.

AFTER THE REVOLUTION

Well, as you know, America won the revolution.  All was fine, right?  Wrong.  America was flat broke.  We had no real money, and no credit.  However, we also had no massive debts either, but things were bad.

An arms dealer named Robert Morris asked George Washington for permission to start a central bank after the fashion of the Bank Of England.  Unfortunately, he wasn't able to get investors to invest anywhere near the $400,000 (a lot of money back then) that he needed.  So, he was able to get a loan from France.  This is the beginning of the National Debt, which has NEVER been paid off since.

However, the bank did profit.  Mr. Morris and his investor friends used their profits to buy up all the remaining shares, and now they owned the bank outright, but it was the government who was in debt to France.  Pretty nice scam, huh?

These shennanigens were put an end to in 1785.  However, Morris and his buddies walked off with all the profits.  America was entering it's first actual depression as an independent nation, and the bank's charter was not renewed.  But Morris still ended up worth millions, with a personal investment of less than $100,000.  Real slick.

THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Well, if it worked once, it could work again.  Along comes the First Bank Of The United States.  This time, the names of the investors were never revealed.  Also, the name sounded so official, that many Americans believed it was part of the U.S. government.  It was every bit as much a private business enterprise as is the Federal Reserve Bank.

Again, the government got loans from the FBUS, and the national debt continued to grow.  However, the FBUS dissolved in 1812, five months before the war.

Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790 

FRANCE

At about the same time, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte was becoming increasingly concerned about a private bank called the Bank Of France, headquartered in Paris.  The bank's owner was named Rothschild.

The Napoleonic Wars cost France a fortune.  Napoleon refused to borrow money from the Rothschilds.  Instead, he sold the Louisiana Territory to the United States.  This angered the Rothschilds.  Not only did they lose out on a huge loan, but they lost their investments in Louisiana.  Napoleon had to go.

Now the Rothschilds also had a bank in England.  Naturally, they were helping to finance England in the war against Napoleon.  Odd, since they also had a major bank in Paris.  Not odd at all.  Both banks were working together.  England got all the financing, and when the money from the Louisiana Purchase ran out, Napoleon couldn't get a loan for a cup of tea.  As a result, Nappy was history.

Napoleon escaped his exile on the Island of Elba in the Mediterranean Sea, and returned to France.  The Eubard Banking House, which unknown to Napoleon, was secretly controlled by the House Of Rothschild, loaned him the money to start another army.  At the same time, they were financing Wellington's army in England.  Obviously, one of them would win.  However, the odds were too close to call, so the armies had to be watched closely by the Rothschilds.

Nathan Rothschild was poised to strike in a bold plan to take control of the British stock market, the bond market, and possibly even the Bank of England.  He had people nearby watching the Battle Of Waterloo.

Even though Wellington won, understandably there was a lot of disorder and chaos.  But not for the Rothschilds.  As soon as Napoleon surrendered, the Rothschild agent took off for London, a full day ahead of Wellington's courier.

Nathan Rothschild went to the British stock market, and began selling all his British backed bonds.  Knowing that Rothschild had family in France, the other investors took that to mean Wellington had lost.  Everyone began selling off their British bonds until they were almost worthless.  At the same time, another of Rothschild's agents was secretly buying up the devalued bonds.  When Wellington's courier reached England with the real news, Rothschild owned three quarters of all the British backed bonds which suddenly skyrocketed in value.  In one afternoon, Rothschild, through lies, deceit, and treachery was now the wealthiest, most powerful man in England.

THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

It was shortly after this that Nathan Rothschild and some fellow Jewish financiers came to New York and began an exclusive investment firm on a previously undistinguished road called Wall Street.

The firm was successful, and is now the most powerful investment institution in the world, with the House Of Rothschild still firmly in control.

In recent times, wealthy American families with blood or financial ties to the Rothschilds include J.P. Morgan and family, the Rockefellers, the Kennedys (as in JFK), and the Carnegies, all of whom are still major players in the financial world today.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

In 1913, the Rothschilds and some American Jews tried yet again to create a successful American central bank.  What they created also had a deceptive name so the average person would think it was part of the U.S. government.  It was called the Federal Reserve Bank, and as you are aware, it is still in existence today, and holds most of the American debt, either through direct ownership, or  indirect ownership by issuance of American bonds to foreign countries such as China, Brazil, and many others. 

As you may already know, every major Federal Reserve Officer except for one is Jewish, including it's President, Ben Shalom Bernanke.

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

As in Merrie Olde England, we too now have a privately owned central bank that holds most of our debt.  Every few years, senseless wars start up for the sole purpose of increasing national debt.  For example, the debt for the Civil War was not paid off until 1916.  Surprise!  One year later we're in WW I.  Then WW II.  Korea.  Vietnam.  The Gulf War.  Then Iraq and Afghanistan.   Let's not forget Yugoslavia, Bosnia, Serbia, Herzegovena.  And now Libya.

The House Of Rothschild, which now controls three quarters of the world's wealth still has the people in it's vile clutches.  We're more slaves to these parasites now than ever.  There is only one hope:  National Socialism.  Why do you think they are so hot to destroy us?  It's either us, or them.  I say it has to be us.  If it isn't, then our Aryan Folk, like the Tally Stick system will be all but forgotten.

Those who do not remember the past, are condemned to relive it. - Santyana.

Sources, Peaceful Revolution Network, Wikipedia, Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Bartlett's Quotations, American Nazi Party

Dan 88!

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Anti-Semitism Is On The Rise


Pam Geller intended her bus ads, implying Muslims and Palestinians are savage to deal a crippling blow to anti-Israel activism. The opposite is happening. By taking the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the streets of America, she is provoking widespread counter-advertisement on transit by pro-Palestinian groups. Local newspaper and internet swell the controversy, inviting an unprecedented public level of anti-Zionist argumentation and documentation.

With a Zionist as unstable in her logic and use of language as Geller at the helm (plus her past utterances advocating nuking Europe and in support of Norwegian mass-murderer Breivik), the Zionist propaganda machine finds itself with representation that could well be more disastrous than beneficial.

This is because Geller's provocations and vulnerability are uncorking a massive underground volcano of public anger at the abuses and atrocities of Zionism. As this volcano erupts, spewing new truth into the blogosphere, its fiery embers of indignation start fires of truth and light everywhere that surrounds it.

These emergent fires are now too many for the Zionists to put out. Criticism of Israel is now being reported by Zionists as overwhelming on U.S. campuses.

Liberal Protestants Erupt Against Israel

Several weeks ago, a similar volcano of pent-up outrage broke forth when a coalition of liberal Christian denominations sent a letter to Congress demanding an end of aid to Israel. This provoked its own eruption of astonishment and outrage from Jewish groups that Christians should have the insulting temerity to make such a recommendation without first consulting the Jews. As a result, Jewish groups, including the Anti-Defamation League, now refuse to continue traditional participation in the Jewish-Christian Round Table. Scheduled to be held in NYC on Monday, it had to be cancelled.

The University of California Student Association at UC Berkley also expressed unilateral independence of thought and action against Zionism recently. In September, condemning the nation of Israel of racism. The UC pro-Israel, Jewish coalition on campus was furious that something like that could happen anti-Zionists taking action without first consulting Jews! 

Rumblings of a Vital Volcano

More and more people, especially encouraged by candor about Zionism and Jewish control on the internet, are publicly acting and speaking their minds against Jewish supremacy presenting facts of history that cannot be effectively countered by Zionist apologists. They are doing so without fear of being labeled anti-semitic i.e., speaking without Jewish permission.

They are also expressing primal anger at Israel's human rights abuses and powers to repeatedly inveigle America into fighting no-win wars for Israel, spilling American blood to make the Mid-East even safer for Israel's injustices.

Here in Portland, where Geller's ads are currently displayed on public transit, the Oregon Area Jewish Committee complains that the ads, both pro and con, are meant to create hate and confusion.  Actually, such a public forum, allowing graphic and incisive presentation of the issues is creating clarity as never before. At last, many are clearly perceiving the simple reality that the whole Mid-East conflict can be traced back to Israel's violent expulsion of 800,000 Palestinians in 1948 into concentration camps, forbidding them to return.

Yes, such heated public dialogue is creating anger. Is such emotion dangerous?

As long as the anger remains an expression of righteous indignation and does not degenerate into anti-semitism (which claims that Jews are genetically degenerate and corrupt), such heat will only produce the light of truth. As Senator Barry Goldwater said, Passion in defense of liberty is no vice.

Geller herself is proving much more savage, too much of a loose cannon on the decks of Zionism, for even the most savage of the Jewish attack groups (such as ADL/SPLC) to have confidence in. I predict that their disapproval of her, which may have been feigned, will soon become real. In fact, The Nation says:

In each city where the ads have appeared, individuals and organizations have denounced the placards, calling them out as the verbal cluster bombs they really are. In both San Francisco and New York, groups of bus and subway scribes garnished the ads with signs saying racist and hate speech.  Interfaith groups have issued moving statements against them, and Sojourners, the Christian social justice organization, took out its own subway billboards, these ones saying, Love Your Muslim Neighbor.  Even Fox News, which has been only too eager to shill for Geller in the past, deemed the ads so inflammatory that Happening Now, the network's weekday news(ish) program, blocked out the word savage when showing viewers the ad.

Outrage has also erupted within the Jewish community, both within Zionist circles, for whom Geller often claims to speak, and without.

So, Pamela, thank you for helping uncork the vital volcano. Keep the ads coming!

Comment:

I must confess that I do not know who authored this little jewel, but whoever it is I'm glad I had the chance to repost it.

Personally, I am unaware of these "ads" in Portland, Oregon, but they don't surprise me in the least.  Just imagine the uproar if Aryans put out ads like that about Jews.  The news would be on every TV and radio station and carried by every newspaper and magazine in the country.  Yet when the Jews pull something like  this, it gets very light coverage.  And anyone who objects to the ads is labelled an Anti-Semite. 

Well comrades, I guess I'm an Anti-Semite.  I object strongly to these ads.  What Ms. Geller is doing would be like one of us going to a Jewish neighbourhood and leaving our literature everywhere.  Such an act by us would only stir up trouble, get us negative publicity, and serve no constructive purpose.

That's exactly what's happening with Ms. Geller and her little campaign.  Too bad she's not getting as much negative publicity as we would, but since the Jews themselves control the media, what else would one expect?  The Aryan Race is the greatest threat to Jewish supremacy, but the Muslims come in a close second.

I would like to thank my old friend Talmud Hater for sending me this story.

Reminder:  Just two more months until Christmas!  By getting your shopping done early, it's easier to show more self-control and restraint and not over-spend.

Dan 88!

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

My Voter's Guide

Comrades, as the election is now less than two weeks away (at least we won't have to put up with all the electioneering after then) I thought I'd give out some recommendations.

As to candidates for federal and state offices, I have nothing to say.  They all all wealthy elites.  

As to candidates for local offices, some of them MAY be able to be trusted.  No guarantees on that.  You have to take them on a case-by-case basis so I have no recommendations other than listen to what they have to say, check out "who they are", and go with your gut.  Generally stay away from Democrats and Republicans - especially at the local level, a Third Party candidate has a better chance of winning.  It is NOT throwing your vote away.  This is an election, not a football game.

As to the propositions, I CAN make some recommendations, however they are only for Californians.  Sorry everyone else, but each state has so many propositions on their ballots, I can't be expected to know them all and make intelligent recommendations.

Prop. 32 - Prevents unions and businesses from deducting money from employee paychecks to use as political contributions WITHOUT employee consent.

Vote NO.  This proposition is a lie.  Super PAC's (Political Action Committees) and huge corporations like Microsoft, Apple, Boeing, and other such companies will be EXEMPT.  In other words, exempt organizations will still be able to deduct money from employee paychecks for political contributions WITHOUT employee consent.  This proposition is sponsored by a group called Citizen's United and is made up of the very companies this law would exempt.  It is an attempt by Judeo-Capitalists to cripple unions who naturally would be against any law that would benefit management.

Prop. 33 - Allows insurance companies to charge higher rates for drivers who cancelled their insurance before taking out another policy or allowed it to lapse.

Vote NO.  Although I'm sick and tired of busting my financial ass to keep my truck insured and in compliance with mandatory liability insurance laws while others seem to be getting away with not having insurance, this law is flawed.  True it would reward those who have been carrying insurance with lower rates, but it would allow insurance companies to also charge higher rates for drivers who let their insurance lapse and put their cars on non-op because of legitimate reasons such as a lengthy hospital stay and recuperation period where they would be unable to drive.  For example, ten years ago I suffered a life threatening illness and was on my back for nearly a year.  I put my truck on non-op and cancelled my insurance to save money.  If this law were in effect then, I would have had to pay more simply because my insurance lapsed or was cancelled.

Prop. 34 - Repeals the death penalty and replaces it with life imprisonment without parole.

Vote NO! - Show murderers the same mercy they showed their victims.  It is argued that the DP is NOT a deterrent to murder.  Indeed it is not, and was never intended to be.  The purpose of the DP is to permanently eliminate people who have been judged a danger to the lives of law-abiding citizens.  Besides, it is cruel to throw a person into a cage for life.  Better to get it over with quick and clean.

Prop. 35 - Increases penalties for those convicted of human trafficking including slavery, child pornography, and prostitution.

Vote YES. - These scum should get the DP, but under today's system, increased prison time is better than nothing.

Prop. 36 - Changes the "Three Strikes" Law to include violent offenders or serious non-violent offenders such as car thieves, or big-time drug or human traffickers.  Those who commit less serious crimes like burglary or shoplifting would be exempt from the "Three Strikes" Law.

Vote YES. - Normally I would say vote no, but as California is broke, we can no longer afford to lock people up for life because of little BS charges.  Our prisons are over-crowded, and many are privately owned for profit by big corporations.  For example, the first person to get life in California under the "Three Strikes" Law was guilty of stealing an ice cream cone.  He was on probation for possession of marijuana for sale.  Under California law, if the amount in possession is less than a certain amount it is a misdemeanor.  However, also under California law, any crime committed while on probation is automatically bumped up to a felony.  Judges can bump it back down to a misdemeanor on a case-by-case basis, but they don't have to.
Sometimes this law can be misapplied.  Petty thieves are a pain-in-the-ass, but when a state is broke, life imprisonment is not a financially practical solution. 

Prop. 37 - Requires that foods that have been genetically engineered be clearly labelled.

Vote Your Choice. - We do have a right to know whether the food we eat has been genetically engineered.  However, if this passes, it could cause food prices to rise as farmers and ranchers would be held more accountable for what they put in our food.  The choice is yours.  What's more important to you?  Is it knowing what's in your food, or lower prices?  On the one hand I'd like to know, but I also want to be able to afford to eat if you get my meaning.  Personally, I'm still undecided.  I'd like to learn more.  However, if I had to vote right this minute, I'd vote no.  Since I'm not certain of the financial repercussions I'd play it safe and leave things as  they are.  Then again, I don't have children to feed and worry about either.

Prop. 38 - Increases state income taxes and sales tax for early childhood education.

Vote NO. - I have several reasons why I advise a no vote.  First, there is no guarantee that the money will go for education.  The state can raid this fund for other programs such as that stupid bullet train or raises for high state officials.  Secondly, the money is only for young children.  High and Middle schools get nothing.  I guess the state figures the older kids are already screwed up and it's too late to try and fix things with them so it would be a waste of money.  Thirdly, it is supposed to raise taxes for the wealthy.  Well evidently the state is unclear as to what constitutes being "wealthy".  This law would raise taxes for everyone who earns $17, 360 a year or more.  The state considers that good annual pay?  The truth is  the wealthy would pay little to no extra as they avail themselves of all kinds of tax shelters and loopholes that the Middle and Working Classes do not have access to.  The rich would wriggle out, and those on welfare, unemployment, and disability would be exempt.  The trouble is, most money from social programs except unemployment insurance is NON-TAXABLE anyway, leaving the working poor and middle class footing the bill as usual.

Prop. 39 - Requires businesses who operate in California but have their headquarters in other states or even offshore in places like Bermuda to pay California business tax.  

Vote YES - Microsoft's headquarters are really in  the Silicone Valley.  However, officially they are in Bermuda.  All they and other corporations have to do is pay the Bermuda government about $10,000 annually, rent a P.O. Box there, and route their mail through it back to Silicone Valley to escape California taxes - the same in other states as well.  There are businesses in Bermuda that do nothing but forward the mail of large corporations back here for a relatively small fee so these companies don't even need to hire one single employee to work out of the island.  Prop. 39 would stop them from getting away with this.  Worker Advocate Groups and Unions say Vote Yes.  Large Corporations say Vote No.  Based on this, the right choice is a no-brainer.

Prop. 40 - Redistricting for state senators.

Vote YES - A no vote on this Proposition would over-turn a voter approved citizen's commission that decides on redistricting.  As things are, this elected commission determines senatorial districting.  A no vote would give the power of redistricting to the state supreme court.  The people of California have previously rejected the idea of this power in the hands of the supreme court.  Also, there is no opposition to Prop. 40 so vote No.

Well that's it comrades.  On November 6, let's get out there and do it!

Dan  88!

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Round Three

I got lucky today.  At work I started one of those tasks you expect to go smoothly and quickly but instead it turns into a major project.  Why was that lucky?  Because I got home so late I missed the third round of the Presidential Debates.  Lucky me.

Unfortunately, I did catch part of it on FOX News.  Actually, I'm glad I did.  Now as I've said, I don't support ANY systemites, but there was one thing Obama said about Romney.  He said that Romney wants to return America to the 1950's.  

My thought was, "What's wrong with that?"  I say let's do it.

Bear in mind Obama was referring to the 1950's sociologically, not technologically.

Let's do a little comparison/contrast.

In the 1950's it was still a White Man's country.  No question about it.  Today, we've become second-class citizens.

In the 1950's, no one was trying to take away our guns.  Now that's one of their main objectives.

Then Queers were in the closet.  Need I say more on this?

Then the government wasn't taking away our rights left right and centre.  Now our rights are disappearing fast.

Then the working class was the backbone of the country.  Now we've been cast aside in the name of profits.

Then the Judeo-Capitalists had more laws to restrain their exploitation of the people.  Now, they have very few restraints.

Then, although people made less, prices were much lower and the dollar had far more buying power.  Today the dollar is worth about 35 cents compared to then.

Then America was the most respected nation on Earth.  Today half the world hates our guts.

Then the Federal Reserve, although powerful was not "ALL POWERFUL".  Today THEY really control the country, not their sock puppet politicians.

Then sex was not shoved in our faces 24/7 by the Jews Media.  Today, we have eight-year-olds dressing like hookers and it's common for kids to start dating by the age of ten.

Then teen pregnancies happened, but not often.  Today it happens all the time and is considered "no big deal."

Then porn was limited to adult bookstores.  Now it's on network TV.

Then drug use was uncommon.  Then if a kid used marijuana it was a BIG DEAL.  Now it's not.  It's even considered to be a rite of passage.

Then if a kid said to another kid, "I'm going to kill you!"  That meant he was going to punch him out.  Today he could very well mean what he says:  Murder.

I could go on and on, but I think I've made my point.  I also want to say something to any liberal who may read this:  New is not always better.  Sometimes it is, but not always.

Each generation wants to get away with more than the generation before.  This leads to moral decay and ethical erosion.  This means declining social structure, decadence, hedonism, multiculturalism, decay of the family, and a general destruction of traditions.

I believe it was sociologist Erik Hoffer who once said, "Traditions are the mortar that binds a society together."

If the mortar in a building crumbles, that building collapses.  Well that's what's happening in our society today.  The mortar of our Folk Community is crumbling and collapse is inevitable.

National Socialism stands for everything that the system is against:  Family, honour, integrity, honesty, values, morality, hard but honest work, and freedom and justice for all.

A return to the 1950's?  Sounds a heck of a lot better that today's world.  The Cold War was still on you may say?  Well yes, but then again nothing is perfect is it?

Dan  88!


Monday, October 22, 2012

Greedy Judeo-Capitalists Aren't The Only Reason For Skyrocketing Food Prices


DENVER (AP) — A suburban Denver man who was diagnosed with "popcorn lung," (Bronchiolitis obliterans)  possibly from inhaling the artificial butter smell of the microwave popcorn he regularly ate, has won a $7.2 million verdict against various food companies.

Wayne Watson's attorney, Ken McClain, said a federal jury granted the award Wednesday against Gilster-Mary Lee Corp., The Kroger Co. and Dillon Companies Inc. after he developed respiratory problems in 2007.

Watson previously settled claims against the flavor developer FONA International Inc., formerly Flavors of North America Inc.

Watson argued the companies failed to warn consumers that inhaling the buttery aroma could put them at risk of lung injury.

KCNC-TV in Denver reports defense attorneys had argued Watson's health problems stemmed not from popcorn but from his years of working with carpet-cleaning chemicals.

___

Information from: KCNC-TV, http://www.cbs4denver.com

Comment:

They gotta be kidding?!  I mean 7.2 million dollars for "popcorn lung"?  It is true that it can be life-threatening, but not necessarily fatal.  Even if this malady is fatal, I still say that is WAY beyond excessive.

I don't know about outside So. California, but here we have a law firm called "Larry H. Parker".  I'm sure anyone from So. Cal. has seen his commercials, and you older comrades might remember the one from many years ago with the Black motorcycle rider who said, "Larry H. Parker got me 2.1 million dollars."

The trouble is that commercial didn't tell the whole story.  Now I never knew this Black biker personally, but he did go to my college (Cal-State San Bernardino) at the same time I did, and naturally when he won his case it was all over campus.  What the commercial didn't tell you is that this guy lost a leg in that accident, he was on our football team, and was being scouted by the pros.  

Naturally after losing a leg, his football career was over before it even began.  His award was not just for losing a leg, but for the loss of possible future earnings if he would have made the pros.  Plus he was hit by a semi belonging to a large company with deep pockets and there was no question the truck driver was at fault.  

I still say even 2.1 million is rather high.  After all, we don't know whether he would have made it all the way to the pros, but at least he became disabled because of the accident.  But 7.2 million for popcorn lung?  Is this guy dying as a result?  Is he permanently disabled?  This is just plain absurd.  No wonder our food prices are so high.

After all, are the food companies who have to pay going to take the loss?  Not bloody likely.  They're going to pass the cost of this ridiculous judgment on to the consumers - meaning you and me.

This turd saw an opportunity to make some easy money and he went for it.  He probably expected to settle out-of-court for a few hundred thousand and just got lucky.  Now he's on easy street and WE'RE stuck with the bill.

Comrades, this is another type of corruption that we must put a stop to:  Frivolous lawsuits.  

Right here in So. Cal. there's a notorious wheelchair bound Mestizo who files such lawsuits at least once a year.  He goes around to bars and restaurants in the Los Angeles area looking for ANY excuse to sue a business because it is "unfair" to disabled people.  He sued one bar because the mirrors in the restroom were too high for someone in a wheelchair to see himself.  He won.  Actually, he settled out-of-court.  He always does.  That's how he earns his living.  In addition to his disability pay, he files these suits and settles out-of-court for ten or twenty thousand dollars a piece.  Doing this once or twice a year and he makes a tidy sum - at OUR expense.  The insurance companies that have to pay just raise their premiums to make up for this kind of crap.

National Socialism would NEVER stand for these shennanigans.  Indeed, people who file false or frivolous lawsuits would face criminal charges and rightly so because in the end it's the PEOPLE who end up paying.

But on the other hand, can you blame these people in a way?  They look around and see the Judeo-Capitalists making obscene sums of money and they want in on it too.  The Judeo-Capitalists are setting an extremely poor example of immoral and unethical behaviour.  When people win these ludicrous cases it will only encourage others to give it a try.  Until we end this system based on greed and avarice, things like this will continue.

TRIVIA:  Neither the 21st nor 20th Centuries were the most litigious.  Taking into account the lower population, the century with the highest percentage of lawsuits filed in the history of this country was the 19th.

Dan  88!