Religious Persecution

Comrades, religious persecution is still alive and well in the United States - where everyone is SUPPOSED to have freedom of religion.  LOL

I'm of course talking about the recent statement from Dan Cathy, president of Chick-Fil-A while being interviewed on a religious radio program about his supporting traditional marriage between a man and woman.  The result?  Immediately the liberal left got out the tar and feathers.  Fortunately for him, things seemed to have backfired for all the PC drones.  Chick-Fil-A is reporting record sales.  Could they be lying?  Not likely.  It's a felony for any corporation to falsify sales and profits regardless of the reason.  

This post is NOT about Gay marriage.  Quite frankly it's no skin off of my apple whether Gays can marry or not.  Basically, I couldn't care less.  I don't support homosexuality in any way.  On the other hand, what two consenting adults do behind closed doors is none of my business.

This post is about religious persecution.  Mr. Cathy made it clear  that he doesn't hate Gays or have any hostile feelings  towards them.  All he said is that he supports the Biblical evaluation of homosexuality:  "If a man lieth with man as he would a woman, both of them have committed an abomination..."  Leviticus, 20:13.

I'm not a religious man, but that seems clear enough to me.  Do I agree with it?  Like I said, it doesn't matter to me one way or another.  But to Christians, it matters.  That belief is their RIGHT.  The U.S. Constitution is SUPPOSED to protect people from persecution because of their religious beliefs.  I wouldn't count on that anymore.

Has Mr. Cathy done anything against the Gay community?  No he hasn't.  He has Gay employees, many of them openly Gay, some in supervisory positions.  Have they been fired?  No.  Have  they been harassed on the job?  If they have, it was without company approval.  Despite Mr. Cathy's statement, nothing has changed for any of Chick-Fil-A's Gay and straight employees - except idiots off the street coming in and giving the EMPLOYEES a hard time - like they had anything to do with it, or could do anything about it.  And if you're one of these left wing self-righteous jerks, and you tell them they should quit their jobs rather than work for a "man like that", that's easy for you to say - especially if you're still employed in these hard economic times.

As a National Socialist, and someone who is self-employed, I have two regular clients who a Jews.  On the one hand, I'd rather not work for Jews, but on the other, money is money and times are tough.  I'll wager that when Hitler was working as a house painter, he worked for Jews now and again.  If anyone says I'm wrong, be prepared to give me proof or I won't accept your statement.  I'll still post it if it's clean and not abusive, but I won't believe it without evidence.

I think the majority of Americans hold my view point.  They don't care one way or the other.  They neither support nor oppose Gay marriage.  There are no Chick-Fil-A's that I know of in the San Bernardino area.  If there were, I would still eat there.

No society in history has ever been able to eradicate homosexuality.  Trying to exterminate them is morally out of the question, and  it could not  be done, practically speaking.  No matter how efficiently done, some would always be missed.  The best thing to do is to not make a big deal out it.  Don't give them any publicity.  Neither discourage nor encourage them.  Don't accept them or harass them.  Live and let live. What other choice is there?  There's no "cure" for homosexuality.  Even if they came up with one, we couldn't make anyone "take the cure".

Unfortunately - "They're here, they're queer - get used to it."  Other than killing them or concentration camps (which would be funded by our tax dollars, btw), anyone have a better solution?  Besides, with unemployment and prices rising, jobs disappearing, half of all American homes in forecloser or near forecloser, with Imperialist Wars being waged by our own government, and corruption everywhere, haven't we got more important things to worry about than who's sleeping with who?

Dan  88!

Comments

  1. WE agree with you on the fact that we have bigger issues to be dealing with. The thing we have against White homosexuals is that, right along with White race-mixers, They are endorsing the extinction of our race. As for Religious Freedom, that has always been a joke in this country!At least in the last 46-47 years that my wife and I have been here!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree 110% with you that religious freedom is a joke - especially these days. But religious intolerance in this country goes all the way back to the Salem Witch Trials.

    As to White Homosexuals endorsing the extinction of our race, I'm not certain I know what you mean. Because they won't be having any children? Well, I'm straight, and I never had any kids. I was never sure I could handle it. I was always "careful" with women, if you know what I mean so there would be no accidents.

    All too often, children are accidentally being brought into this world by people who have no business having kids in the first place. Maybe I could have been a good father. Maybe not. I was unwilling to take the chance. Besides, I'm poor and kids cost money. Okay, okay, I'm also cheap too. There, I said it! LOL

    Dan 88!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well Dan you aren't the only one who doesn't fall into the marriage and kid routine. A lot of people will think one is abnormal if they decide not to have kids or wait longer to have kids. I spent my 20's in college and working so I had no time. My idea of fun was to find a few extra hours to sleep. In my late 20's my career took off and I still had plans of finding that special someone but all the men that came my way weren't worth having. It takes so much energy in the dating game so I decided not to engage in the game of love. I just live life as a single and I'm enjoying every minute of it not being tied down to hubby and kids etc.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kat, we do think alike. Maybe we should get married. Wait a minute, that's an oxymoron isn't it? Forget I said that! LOL

      Dan 88!

      Delete
  4. I think the nazis were against homosexuals because it is a perversion of what is considered the norm. However there were a lot of openly homosexual men in the SA. Ernst Rohm was one of them.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that, and they thought the practice was bad for the community.

      Yep, Ernie was a Fairy alright. That's not why Hitler had him killed. Rohm was killed because he was a political threat. Hitler referred to him as a political dinosaur.

      Dan 88!

      Delete
  5. To escape religious persecution was one of the reasons people fled and came here. I suppose today we have what is called freedom from religion vs religious freedom. A type of tolerance and indifference because people are afraid of holding true to their religious beliefs. Before I got into WWII history (where I've been every since) I had a religious freedom group that had constant infighting.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dan I think the post by Rick and Gina did in fact mean that gays don't procreate and NS is in favor of family and has lots of traditional family beliefs. However, there was lebensborn that really was a foul idea that upset traditional family values and undermined marriage values too.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're quite right. The NSDAP stressed TRADITIONAL family values.

      Now I know they also stressed women as housewives and mothers. But that was a refection of the times. Didn't American values of the time stress the same things regarding women?

      Not all women are cut out for motherhood. So, why shouldn't they have a career instead? I'm against the "Superwoman Syndrome". You can't have a full time career and be a full time housewife and mother.

      Occasionally the roles can be reversed. Say a single woman is a doctor. She decides to get married and her husband is an accountant. It doesn't make any sense for her to give up her career, and let her husband the accountant work for a fraction of what she makes. Some men can be very good stay-at-home-dads.

      As a rule, I feel that men should be the bread winners, while the women take care of the house and kids. But to every rule there are exceptions, and to fail to realize this is wrong. When rules are set in stone, everybody suffers.

      Also, when the kids get older, there's no reason a woman can't reenter the workforce if she wants to.

      I always feel the welfare of the children come first at all times. They had no choice in being born. The parents did.

      Dan 88!

      Delete
  7. Good reply post Dan! It's feaking amazing to me how the ANP has come full circle in regard to women. I've never viewed NS as detrimental or offensive to women btw. Some of the neo NS groups are a mutated type of NS which do exclude women. I figure they never learned real history so they didn't have a clue and so I ignore them.

    Dan you mentioned the superwoman syndrome. I don't even get that specific in regard to females. I usually just say that it's good for a female to use all of her potential without becoming overwhelmed. It's also good that you mentioned the kids and put them first!

    There is a problem where the higher education system stresses the unfairness in regard to women and men who perform the same jobs. This sexism is out there and it seems it will always be. In college I had to take a class that specifically addressed this issue. It is designed to infuriate women and set them against men. At the end of this class they were passing out applications to join N.O.W. (National Organization Women) and I refused to take that application. I felt it was a fight that wasn't my fight. Anyway, I just wanted to mention that along with the higher education system there is mixed in a lot of teaching that creates feminist women and it's not all the type as direct as this one class.

    Kat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, that is so true. Class warfare isn't enough to set us at each others throats. They have to add the war between the sexes to make things even more difficult.

      Dan 88!

      Delete

Post a Comment