Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Navajo Indian Branded With Swastikas



ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A New Mexico man pleaded not guilty Monday to federal hate-crime charges in the case of a mentally disabled Navajo man who had a swastika branded on his arm with a hot metal clothes hanger.

William Hatch, 29, of Fruitland and two other defendants are the first to be prosecuted by the federal government under a historic 2009 law targeting hate crimes involving disabilities or sexual orientation.

Hatch entered the plea during his initial appearance at the federal courthouse.

Paul Beebe, 26, and Jesse Sanford, 25, both of Farmington, also appeared but had no attorneys and didn't enter pleas. U.S. Magistrate Robert Scott indicated he would have lawyers appointed to represent both men then scheduled their arraignments for Tuesday.

All three defendants wore orange inmate jumpsuits, with their hands and feet shackled.

Along with the branding in April, the three men are accused of shaving a swastika onto the back of the 22-year-old victim's head and using markers to write "KKK" and "White Power" on him.
Image: Swastika burned into man's arm
Farmington Police Dept. / AP
Three men are accused of branding a swastika onto a Navajo man.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Roberto Ortega said the case is the first in the nation to be pursued by the Justice Department under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

The law was named after two men who were murdered in 1998 in Wyoming and Texas. The statute expanded a 1969 federal hate crime law to include crimes motivated by a victim's disability, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation.

Shepard was a gay Wyoming college student who was beaten and found dead tied to a fence post. Byrd was a black man who was chained to a pickup truck by three white men and dragged to his death.

Indictments in the New Mexico case were handed down on Nov. 12.

Hatch, Beebe and Sanford also face state charges of kidnapping, aggravated battery and conspiracy. The federal and state cases will run simultaneously, and federal prosecutors plan to work closely with the district attorney's office in Farmington.

If convicted of the hate crime statute, each defendant could face prison terms of up to 10 years. The possible sentence could increase to life if prosecutors prove kidnapping occurred.

Each also faces a conspiracy charge, which carries a possible five-year prison sentence upon conviction.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comment:

This is exactly the kind of thing that we DON'T need happening. What did these three accomplish? Nothing constructive. All these turds succeeded in doing was to assault a harmless, disabled Native American, and give the media lots of ammunition to use against true National Socialists such as those in the ANP.

Remember comrades, the Jewish run media just laps this stuff up. It boosts their ratings, plus sets back our movement. If someday, a White revolution does occur, that's one thing, but random violence like this gives all of us a black eye.

I urge all of you to stay legal, and watch the racial slurs while in public. Words like Nigger uttered publicy only serve to show ignorance. The ANP is a respectable organisation. Let's all behave appropriately at all times. Hail Victory!

Monday, November 29, 2010

My First ANP Video

video

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Smuggling Tunnel Found In San Diego

By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press Elliot Spagat, Associated Press – Nov. 26, 2010
SAN DIEGO – A sophisticated cross-border tunnel equipped with a rail system, ventilation and fluorescent lighting has been shut down by U.S. and Mexican officials — the second discovery of a major underground drug passage in San Diego this month, authorities said Friday.

The tunnel found Thursday is 2,200 feet long — more than seven football fields — and runs from the kitchen of a home in Tijuana, Mexico, to two warehouses in San Diego's Otay Mesa industrial district, said Mike Unzueta, head of investigations at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in San Diego.

In Mexico, the tunnel's cinderblock-lined entry dropped 80 to 90 feet to a wood-lined floor, Unzueta said. From the U.S. side, there was a stairway leading to a room about 50 feet underground that was full of marijuana.

"It's a lot like how the ancient Egyptians buried the kings and queens," Unzueta said.

Authorities seized more than 20 tons of marijuana.

Unzueta said the tunnel discovered Thursday and another found in early November are believed to be the work of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, headed by that country's most-wanted drug lord, Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.

"We think ultimately they are controlled by the same overall cartel but that the tunnels were being managed and run independently by different cells operating within the same organization," Unzueta said.

The passage found Thursday is one of the most advanced to date, with an entry shaft in Mexico lined with cinderblocks and a rail system for drugs to be carried on a small cart, Unzueta said.

Three men were arrested in the United States, and the Mexican military raided a ranch in Mexico and made five arrests in connection with the tunnel, authorities said.

U.S. authorities have discovered more than 125 clandestine tunnels along the Mexican border since the early 1990s, though many were crude and incomplete.

U.S. authorities do not know how long the latest tunnel was operating. Unzueta said investigators began to look into several warehouses in June on a tip that emerged from a large bust of marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department.

U.S. authorities followed a trailer from one of the warehouses to a Border Patrol checkpoint in Temecula, where they seized 27,600 pounds of marijuana. The driver, whose name was not released, was arrested, along with two others who went to a residence in suburban El Cajon that had $13,500 cash inside.

"That (trailer) was literally filled top to bottom, front to back," Unzueta said. "There wasn't any room for anything else in that tractor-trailer but air."
Three tons of marijuana were found in a "subterranean room" and elsewhere in the tunnel on the U.S. side, authorities said. Mexican officials seized four tons of pot at a ranch in northern Mexico, bringing the total haul to more than 20 tons.

The discovery of the cross-border tunnel earlier this month marked one of the largest marijuana seizures in the United States, with agents confiscating 20 tons of marijuana they said was smuggled through the underground passage. One of the warehouses involved in the tunnel discovered Thursday is only a half-block away.
Several sophisticated tunnels have ended in San Diego warehouses. ICE began meeting with landowners last month to warn them about leasing space to tunnel builders.

"These owners of warehouses, they need to know their customers, they need to know who's in there leasing these things," Unzueta said.

Comment:

If the U.S. Government would pull our troops out of the Middle East and deploy them along the southern borders with full authority to act, things like this would be far less likely to happen. But no! We have to waste our time, money and resources fighting wars for Israeli interests.

Also, our unsecured borders serve different purposes in addition to that. The government doesn't want the borders too tightly secured. They need to keep the terrorist threat level high enough so they can crack down on us! This is of course, just an excuse to increase their control over the people.

Another reason is they don't want to interfere too much with the flow of illegal aliens across the border. ZOG is of course comprised of mostly wealthy Judeo-Capitalists who use the illegals as a source of cheap, exploitable labour. Employing these invaders while putting American Citizens, primarily White workers in the unemployment line, is one of the ways they increase their profit margins.

We don't need intrusive electronic security equipment at every airport, rail and bus station, and docks to make this country safe. What we need is our borders to be secured. When that's accomplished, then we'll be a lot safer without any loss of privacy, or any sacrifice of our constitutional rights.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

If You Travel, Leave Your Dignity At Home


Body Scanners and Intrusive Pat Downs To Be Implemented in Train Stations, Boats and Public Transportations Systems Nationwide!

Since the TSA ramped up their security measures in late October, American citizens have been subjected to the toxic naked body scanners as well as molestation at the hands of low IQ thugs. Contrary to what Janet Napolitano has publicly stated, the scanners do contain harmful radiation as outlined by numerous scientists. People such as Michael Chertoff have pushed the scanners while at the same time having huge financial holdings in the very companies that stand to make billions off of implementing them worldwide.



http://theintelhub.com/2010/11/24/bo...ms-nationwide/

As if the scanners weren’t bad enough, citizens who refuse the radiation are being subjected to intrusive and sometimes illegal searches. Six year old boys have been undressed and searched as terrorists, women have had their prosthetic breasts removed, urine bags have been broken, passengers have been arrested for opting out, and attractive women have been singled out for full body searches.


To add insult to injury, the TSA is actually running a blog that attempts to debunk the public outcry against their illegal acts. The blogs are written in a sarcastic tune in a way that implies that citizens who fight against their abuse will not only be arrested but will also be made fun of on an official agency blog.

This is happening despite widespread protest. Essentially, DHS officials have stated that the will of the American people matters very little and will not change their policy. Our beloved Constitution has been been deemed irrelevant by the very agents who have sworn to protect it. This is all being done in the name of saving us from the cave dwelling ninjas known as Al Qaeda.
The evidence that most terror attacks are staged and the creation of rogue intelligence agents rather than Islamic extremists has been completely ignored by the corporate media and politicians alike.


As the Thanksgiving travel season continues and thousands of people fall victim to TSA tyranny, DHS officials are contemplating installing body scanners at public places throughout America. Americans will no longer be able to take their family to a baseball game without idiot security agents harassing and searching the whole family.


It is very possible that Americans will be literally FORCED into the scanners if they wish to travel at all. Depopulation advocates worldwide are calling for the banning of all travel that isn’t deemed essential by the government. The only mode of transportation would then be public, where you will be treated like a terrorist until you are strip searched.


IF TSA head John Pistole gets his way, the scanners and security measures will be implemented on subways and trains throughout the U.S.

USA Today
ARLINGTON, Va. — Protecting riders on mass-transit systems from terrorist attacks will be as high a priority as ensuring safe air travel, the new head of the Transportation Security Administration promises.


In his first interview since taking over the TSA, former FBI deputy director John Pistole told USA TODAY that some terrorists consider subway and rail cars an easier target than heavily secured planes. “Given the list of threats on subways and rails over the last six years going on seven years, we know that some terrorist groups see rail and subways as being more vulnerable because there’s not the type of screening that you find in aviation,” he said. “From my perspective, that is an equally important threat area.”


How is it possible that Al Qaeda agents have the ability to attack our mass transit systemx? The CIA, Mossad, and MI6 literally have the ability to intercept/listen to communications worldwide. It is not possible for Al Qaeda to stage a major event without the help of rogue intelligence agents working at the behest of globalists whose aim is to establish a world governing body that would supersede the Constitution.


We are being led to believe that our fundamental rights must be taken away in order to stay safe from terrorists. The federal government is planning to install the body scanners and intrusive security measures at all large scale public areas at a time when the majority of Americans are outraged over the scanners being inside airports let alone multiple other public places. We have been given a clear message: Our feelings mean nothing and public outcry will only lead to more police state measures.


Instead of outlawing the scanners and TSA molestation, DHS head Janet Napolitano is pushing the same line as TSA head John Pistole.

The Hill
The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.


Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says terrorists will continue to look for U.S. vulnerabilities, making tighter security standards necessary.


“[Terrorists] are going to continue to probe the system and try to find a way through,” Napolitano said in an interview that aired Monday night on “Charlie Rose.”


“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?”

One of the only possible measures that we can take is to literally not comply. We must stand up and opt out as a country before our country becomes a third world police state playground.

Comment:

Just posting this article can land me on the TSA's "No Fly" List. TSA has stated that critisizing security measures is circumstancial evidence that you are a terrorist. They reason that if you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't object. After all, it's for your safety. THAT ISN'T THE POINT! The point is that these overkill tactics are an insult to the dignity of American citizens! They are intrusive, and an invasion of privacy. As a nation, we indeed must stand up against the government and say "NO!"

Those who trade their freedom for safety deserve neither. - Benjamin Franklin.

Friday, November 26, 2010

True Story! - Happy Thanksgiving Comrades!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Some Illegals Will Have A Better Thanksgiving Than Some Of Us!

Illegal Immigrants With Fake Social Securities Get Tax Refunds!

An advocacy group partially funded by the U.S. government is helping illegal immigrants who work with fake Social Security numbers recover unclaimed income tax refunds.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/20...et-tax-refunds

The New York nonprofit, Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, has so far helped a dozen illegal aliens get back thousands of dollars in state tax refunds, according to a local newspaper report. In some cases the undocumented aliens use bogus Social Security numbers, which is a serious federal offense.

In most instances the illegal immigrants filed taxes using a special identification number that rarely receives scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and allows workers to get federal refunds. However, New York’s tax agency flags employees who provide mismatched information like a Social Security that doesn’t correlate with a name and doesn’t mail refunds to those candidates.

Thanks to the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, which receives money from city, state and federal government sources, those lawbreakers are getting refunds. After all, the group aims to promote financial justice in New York’s low-income communities and in communities of color. It also strives to eliminate discriminatory economic practices that harm communities and perpetuate inequality and poverty.

What about the injustice in stealing someone’s identity? The group’s associate director claims it’s a harmless crime because most illegal immigrants use Social Security numbers that are made up and not stolen from a real person. Either way, the immigrant advocate reminds that labor laws protect all workers, even the undocumented.

Comment:

I think I'm confused here. Financial justice for illegals? Refunds? Since when do illegals pay income taxes? If some of them are, then that must mean they have filed a W-2 form with the IRS. If so, then a citizenship document must be on file. If it isn't, and they aren't citizens, then there is no proof of citizenship or green card on file, so the IRS must know they are illegals, yet they are still withholding taxes from them, not giving them refunds, but still allowing them to stay in the country. Does this sound likely? I'll bet it is. As long as they are paying, the IRS is not going to do a damn thing, especially if they are paying in, but not getting any refunds. ZOG is getting paid, and they don't have to pay back, so they certainly won't want to deport their gravy train.

Comrades, this kind of corruption must stop now! Our government is supposed to be a government of the people, not against the people. But that is exactly what it has become. They do as they see fit, and we can just like it or lump it. I say we do neither. It's time to stand up to ZOG and DEMAND that the will of the people be enacted.

When the government fails to serve the people, it's time for a new government. - Thomas Jefferson.

The government has failed to serve the people. WWTJD (What Would Thomas Jefferson Do)?

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Cars: New Or Used?

In case some of you are wondering why I've been writing so many financial articles lately, the answer is simple. The real purpose of credit in this corrupt system of theirs, is to separate you from as much money as possible. I'm just trying to inform you and give you some facts you can use if you feel you must use the Judeo-Capitalist credit system.

But anyway, should you buy used or new? Well, that depends on what you can afford, and what your specific needs are. Anyone who buys a new car or motorcycle and finances it, when they don't really need it, they just want it, is a sucker and they deserve to lose their money. That's harsh, but it's true. If you can't afford to pay cash, then you don't need it. I have a truck and a Harley and I own the pink slips (which are now green in California), and I wouldn't have it any other way.

You might say, "But cars are so expensive. Most of us could never afford to pay cash. And when your old car goes out on you, you need another one fast." True enough. But the question is do you need a NEW car, or do you just want one. Needing and wanting are two completely different things.

If you consider interest rates, finance charges, full coverage accident and theft insurance, life insurance that pays off the finance company in case you have a heart attack or something, plus any other fees, by the time you've paid it all off, you've paid double what the car was orginally worth. Also, never forget that once the wheels touch the street after you buy a new car, it is no longer a new car. If you want to sell it for some reason, no dealer will give you full value because it is a used car, even if you've only had it for one day. In other words, you're being ripped off royally.

And for those of you who like SUV's, but never go off roading, you are double suckers. Now I'm not familiar with the laws in all the states, just here in California. What does SUV stand for? SPORT Utility Vehicle. They key word is sport. In California, that makes it a sports car. Vehicle registration fees are higher for all sports vehicles. Also, insurance rates are higher as well. PLUS, SUV's are four wheel drive. In California it's also an extra registration fee for four wheel drives, and the insurance companies are allow to charge you even more for coverage. If you own an SUV in California, you're getting ripped off four different ways as compared to a two wheel drive, non-sport vehicle. Hey, if you like throwing your money away, send it to me. I could always use some extra. I'm serious. Why give it to the bankers? Help out a Party Comrade and give it to me! P.O. Box 2145, Rialto, Ca., 92377.

As to leasing, that's even worse. I remember when Homer Simpson bought an SUV called a Canyonero. Here's the conversation.

Salesman: Now Mr. Simpson, I've broken your lease down for you. Here's your monthly payment, your weekly payment, and your CPB.

Homer: What's a CPB?

Salesman: Crippling balloon payment.

Homer: But that's not for a long time, right?

Salesman: Right!

Homer: Sweet!

There are some advantages with leasing over buying, but in the end, it's really going to cost you. DON'T DO IT! In many cases there is a CPB. Watch for it when leasing.

There's a common belief that when you buy or lease, you have a three day "cooling off" period where you can change your mind and get out of the contract without any penalty. Is this true? Not in California it isn't. There is no cooling off period. However, if you insist on financing or leasing a car, you can negotiate a clause in your contract for a cooling off period. I highly recommend you do. That way if you do change your mind, you're not stuck.

As to buying used, there are two old sayings, "Buy a used car, you buy someone else's troubles." And, "You buys your ticket and takes your chances." However, if you know a little something about cars, or have a friend who does, you can get a decent car and avoid the lemons. In California, you have the right to take a car you're thinking of buying to your mechanic (at your expense) before you pay the owner anything. Also, even if you buy the car "as is", the seller is responsible for replacing any missing emissions control equipment. For example, if you go to get your car smogged, and the technician says, "Sorry, I can't put this on the machine. Your O 2 sensor is missing." The one you bought the car from is obligated by law to buy you a new sensor. Also, if he knew the car was a piece of junk and told you it was a good car, he has committed fraud and must give you your money back, even if you bought it "as is." If he won't, sue his ass.

Another way to go is auto auctions. They are all over the place, and it's easy to do. Right now, I own a 1999 Ford F150 Pick Up. I bought it last year at a police auction for $525, plus tax and registration fees. About $675 out the door. That's right, a 1999 six cylinder truck in good to excellent condition for a total of $675. Did it need any repairs? Yes, a front windshield, cost $100 even. That's a total of $775 for tax, registration, price, and repairs. I sold my old Chevy S10 for $675, meaning this truck cost me only $100 including all fees. You can't beat that! I've never liked cops, but I got something off of them this time, and it was not a fluke. I helped a friend get a Bronco for $575. I saw someone get a 2005 Ford Escort for $250! Call your local police or sheriff and ask where the nearest police auction is. Then call them and ask when the next one will be, and when the viewing will be so you can see the cars before you buy. There are also private auctions, but expect the bidding to start higher, as they are out to make a profit, and all the cops care about is getting the towing and impound fees covered by the sale. Private auctions can be found in the Yellow Pages, or on Google. All police auctions require that you have a valid driver's licence. If you don't, give the money to a friend and have him or her buy it for you. Sh! You didn't hear that!

Now I must warn you that auctions are different from sales. Buying at auctions really is "as is". NO EXCEPTIONS. If you don't know anything about cars, bring a friend who does. That way you can avoid the junk, and have a better chance at a good car. I bought both my old Chevy S10 and my Ford F150 at auction. A winner both times. BTW, I drove my Ford all the way to Pulaski, Tennessee and back to San Bernardino last summer. The only problem I had was one flat tire. But I do know a little something about cars. If you go to an auction, I recommend you don't go alone, unless you too are car savvy.

As you may see, I'm partial to auctions. Not just because I can save a fortune, but because I can keep my hard earned money from the greedy banksters. Never forget that they are out to take as much of your money as they can. No matter how friendly they sound, they want your money, not your friendship. I won't give them either. As a National Socialist, I don't support the credit system, and neither should you. Credit is to be used as a last resort, and only after you've tried everything else. If you can get a nice car, plus keep your money away from the vultures, then you're batting a thousand in my book!

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Thanks!

I just want to take a moment to thank everyone who has signed on as a follower of this blog. I hope to be able to continue to keep you well informed about National Socialism and the ANP for a long while to come.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Real Estate And Lawyers

What do lawyers and catfish have in common? They're both scum-sucking bottom dwellers! LOL

Many people wonder if it is worth the cost to have an attorney look over your mortgage before you sign it. That all depends. Especially for first time home buyers, an attorney is not needed - if you want the banks to take advantage of you, that is. Trust me, they will take every advantage they can. You need to be prepared. That means an attorney. If you have a friend who is a banker or a real estate agent, they will do. If you call around, many attorneys will look over a mortgage and advise you for $50 - $100. Just consider that part of your home buying expenses. It's a small enough price to pay for a little peace of mind.

But why do you need one? Well, do you know the difference between adjustable and fixed interest rates? Do you understand closing costs? How about property insurance (in case the house burns down), or life insurance (in case you die outside of the home so the bank gets paid off)? You go to the bank to close the deal, and they hand you a stack of papers two or three inches thick and tell you to sign and/or initial in a dozen or more places. Of course, first they tell you to read it all. How many of you actually would sit there and read all of that? And even if you would, how many of you would even understand it? "The party of the first part, in consideration of the party of the second part, in conjuction with the party of the third part, do hereby stipulate and affirm, blah, blah, blah..." You may not want to openly admit that you don't understand the majority of that goobledygook, but are you going to sign it anyway to avoid a little embarrassment? Not if you have any brains you won't. Most of us would need help, and the intelligent thing to do is get it now, or be sorry later.

You may think you can get the gist of it, and ask the banker for further clarification. Bad idea. As Comrade Taylor Bowles wrote in the last issue of the White Worker, people have become poor deep readers. They'll read the first line or two thoroughly, then start skimming a few lines, then read another line deeply, then start skimming again. He described it as an "F" pattern, and accurately so. But call it what you may, you won't get a proper understanding of what you're reading that way. Add to it that it is written in legal and banking jargon - forget it. Many people, afraid of being embarrassed, just pretend they're reading, then say they understand, then sign on the dotted line, thereby giving their souls to the devil, so to speak. I wouldn't trust the banker to help you understand. He doesn't want you to. He'll of course say, "Don't worry, it's just a standard contract." Maybe so, but do you really understand how a standard contract works? He may also say something about a particular clause in the mortgage that you are concerned about in this way, "Don't be concerned. It's for your protection." Yeah right. If you believe that one, you are a sucker. The banks aren't going to do anything that will benefit you over them. They are out to take as much of your money as they can, and you can take that to the bank!

Buying a house can be totally overwhelming. Make it easier on yourself. Pay that very reasonable fee and have an attorney look over all the paperwork for you. You'll sleep better at night.

Attorneys do indeed work for a corrupt, Judeo-Capitalist system, but if you're smart, you can use that to your advantage. In a true National Socialist state, the only use we'd have for attorneys would be in primarily criminal and political matters. Buying a house would be simple and straightforward. Until that day comes, you must use every resource at your disposal to keep the leeches from draining you dry.

Sunday, November 21, 2010

The American Dream

The American Dream has always been to own your own home. However, thanks to the Judeo-Capitalist banking system, that dream has become a nightmare. However, with the proper knowledge, you can reduce that nightmare to a minimum.

First of all, do the banks want you to default on your mortgage? Well, yes and no. Yes they want you to default so they can foreclose and take your house, but they don't want to do it for several years. When they foreclose, you lose all your equity (the amount you have paid-off). Most people have a 30 year mortgage. If you paid ten years worth, that's one third, and then fall on hard times due to say a layoff, they have all your money, plus a house they can resell at full value. You must pay a minimum amount before it pays them to foreclose. How long do you suppose that is? At least five years.

One of the things that caused the bottom to drop out of the real estate market back in 2008 was the "adjustable rate mortgage." The banks would offer consumers a mortgage rate with lower interest and monthly payments - for a certain period of time, which was five years. Its sort of like how the cable TV companies offer low rates to new customers for one year on a two year contract. After the first year, your rates go way up and you have to pay, because you have a contract. Same with these mortgages, except that it goes up after five years, rather than one.

If you think about it, it may sound like a good deal, but only if you know you can make the payments when the rates readjust in five years. The problem with this is mainly the consumers. They buy a house with a rate they can afford now, but not in five years. They figure that in five years they'll be making a lot more money than today. They count on raises, promotions, or getting a better job. They basically gamble that they'll be doing better in five years than today. What are the stakes for you? Your house. If you guess wrong about your future earnings, you lose everything. The banks NEVER lose. If you can make your payments when the rates readjust, the banks get their money. If you can't, they get your house and keep the fives years of payments you paid them.

Let me ask you all this. Would you make a large wager with money you don't have and can't get? I have a friend who will bet on anything. He'll bet on the weather, how you're feeling, just about anything. Now this may shock you, but when a crazy guy like that bets, sometimes he bets more than he has. Now when he wins, that's OK. But when he loses - well, you get my meaning. If you buy a house and can pay now, but not in five years, you are gambling with money you don't have. Can any of us be certain we'll be doing better in five years than today? In these uncertain times, definitely not. But even when times were financially good, you still can't be certain. You are still gambling that you'll be making more money in five years than today, and that is a tragic mistake. Companies lay off, downsize, and outsource jobs. You never know. When getting such a mortgage, if you can make the payments now, but not when the rates readjust, then you cannot afford this house. Don't gamble with your family's future. For you, it is a break even/lose situation. But for the banks, it is a break even/win situation.

A National Socialist government would provide the people with affordable, decent homes, with interest free mortgages. The consumer would only pay for the paperwork costs, and no hidden or junk fees. How could it do this? Easy. Unlike the banks, whose sole purpose is to take as much of your money as it can, the government would only charge for the cost of the loan. NO PROFITS! National Socialism works for the benefit of its people. IT NEVER EXPLOITS THEM.

The American Nazi Party is the best chance to achieve such a government. We have a plan, and good people. We have even had people running for office. Truthfully, they didn't win. But it was only the first election. Remember, when Hitler ran for president, he lost to Hindenburg. The first step towards success is running. We've taken that step. We'll keep going, and eventually, we'll succeed. Be apart of this. If you are not already an ANP Supporter, become one now!

Saturday, November 20, 2010

And The Libertards Say Illegals Don't Cost That Much!

U.S. Spending At Least $18.6 Million Per Day to Incarcerate Illegal Aliens
More Than 195,000 Illegal Aliens Deported in Fiscal 2010 Had Committed Crimes Here

CNSNews.com) – U.S. taxpayers are spending at least $18.6 million per day to house an estimated 300,000 to 450,000 illegal immigrants who are incarcerated and eligible for deportation from the United States, according to data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The cost per day for these prisoners is based on Justice Department incarceration cost estimates from 2001 and on the lower-end figure of 300,000 incarcerated deportable aliens, which means the actual expense today could be substantially higher than $18.6 million per day.

The prisons involved here are foreign national who have come into the United States, committed a crime, been captured, and imprisoned.

Half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal 2010 (which ended on Sept. 30) had been convicted of a crime in the United States.

On Wednesday, the office of the DHS Inspector General (IG) released its annual performance plan report for fiscal year 2011, which states that there are “approximately 300,000 to 450,000 criminal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, county, and local correctional facilities [who] are eligible for removal from the United States.”

In its March 2010 report, "Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2009," the DHS defines removal as "the compulsory and confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United States based on an order of removal. An alien who is removed has administrative or criminal consequences placed on subsequent reentry owing to the fact of the removal."

Kara McCarthy, a spokeswoman at the DOJ, told CNSNews.com that the latest data available show that “average annual operating costs per state inmate for Fiscal Year 2001 was $22,650; in the Federal Bureau of Prisons it was $22,632.”

These annual operation costs exclude “capital expenditures, juvenile corrections, probation, parole, and most central office functions of corrections spending,” McCarthy told CNSNews.com

The cost of $22,650 per year to house just one inmate at the state level equals about $62 a day ($22,650 divided by 365 days). In the Federal Bureau of Prisons, it also averages out to $62 per day ($22,632 divided by 365 days).

Given this daily average expense (based on fiscal year 2001 costs), it can be estimated that the cost of housing 300,000 incarcerated illegal aliens in U.S. prisons would equal $18.6 million per day; the cost for housing 450,000 incarcerated illegal aliens would equal $27.9 million per day. If inflation in prison costs since 2001 were factored in, the expense would be even greater.

When CNSNews.com asked why incarcerated aliens who are eligible for removal have not been deported, a DHS spokesperson said, “It is because they are still serving their criminal sentence. ICE does not receive criminal aliens from state criminal justice systems until after they have completed their sentences.” (ICE is the acronym for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.)

On the same day the IG’s office released its performance plan report, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton announced that half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal year 2010, which ended on Sept. 30, were convicted criminals.

“In fiscal year 2010, ICE set a record for overall removals of illegal aliens, with more than 392,000 removals nationwide,” says an Oct. 6 press release from the DHS. “Half of those removed--more than 195,000--were convicted criminals.”

“The fiscal year 2010 statistics represent increases of more than 23,000 removals overall and 81,000 criminal removals compared to fiscal year 2008--a more than 70 percent increase in removal of criminal aliens from the previous administration,” added the release.

It is uncertain whether the IG office’s estimate of 300,000 to 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens who are eligible for removal takes into account the 195,000 criminal aliens removed in fiscal 2010. The IG office did not respond to CNSNews.com for a clarification on this point before this story was posted.

Nevertheless, the DHS did not deport all of the criminal illegal aliens who are eligible for removal and are currently sitting in U.S. correctional facilities.

The DOJ spokeswoman told CNSNews.com that, according to its latest figures, “In 2008 there were 785,556 inmates in the nation's [local and county] jails and 1,518,559 inmates in state and federal prisons.” That equals 2,304,115 inmates in total in the United States.

Given those numbers, 300,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 13 percent of the entire inmate population of the United States, while 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 19.5 percent of the entire inmate population.

According to the IG report from DHS, “The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires ICE to initiate deportation proceedings for incarcerated criminal aliens as expeditiously as possible after the date of conviction. Criminal aliens who are eligible for deportation include illegal aliens in the United States who are convicted of any crime and lawful permanent residents who are convicted of a removable offense as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.”

Comment:

How much more do I need to say? If you add the above mentioned costs to the drain on our healthcare system, education system, and social programs, the costs become literally staggering!

These leaches are draining us dry. Enough is enough! The gravy train must end here and now!

Friday, November 19, 2010

AZ boycott over immigration law sees mixed results

By BOB CHRISTIE, Associated Press Bob Christie, Associated Press – Thu Nov 18, 5:48 pm ET

PHOENIX – A boycott brought on by Arizona's controversial immigration crackdown raised the specter of vacant convention centers, desolate sports arenas and struggling businesses throughout the state.

Seven months later, the boycott's effects are coming into focus, showing it has been a disruptive force but nowhere near as crippling as originally feared.
Businesses have lost lucrative contracts and conventions have relocated, performers called off concerts, and cities and counties in about a dozen states passed resolutions to avoid doing business with Arizona. A report released Thursday says the boycott has cost the state $141 million in lost meeting and convention business since Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the law in April.

But the state's economy hasn't come to a screeching halt — as some who organized the boycott hoped. In fact, more people went to the Grand Canyon this summer than last year, and more stayed in Arizona's hotels and resorts, according to a review by The Associated Press.

"My occupancy has been pretty strong," said Flagstaff bed and breakfast owner Gordon Watkins. He got a few calls from confused international customers wondering if they would be asked for their papers, but no one canceled their reservations, he said, and business has been brisk.

Many conventions decided not to move, despite questions from their members. At the Phoenix Convention Center on Thursday, about 1,300 exhibitors, distributors and buyers were attending an annual show put on by the National School Supply & Equipment Association.

"We just kind of kept our eye on our members, and at least in our industry, they were coming whether that law was there or not," said Bill Duffy, the group's vice president of operations and meetings.

The most controversial parts of the law are on hold, including a section that would require police officers who are enforcing other laws to question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally. The federal government has won an injunction blocking the provisions and Arizona is awaiting a decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on its appeal.
Civil rights groups organized the boycott to slow the state's economy in much the same way that a boycott punished Arizona 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. with a holiday. After voters approved that law, the NFL pulled the 1993 Super Bowl from Phoenix, and the NBA told the Phoenix Suns not to bother putting in a bid for the All-Star game. By the time voters finally passed a holiday bill two years later, estimates of lost convention business in the Phoenix area alone topped $190 million.

This time around, groups called on people not to fly Tempe-based US Airways or rent trucks from Phoenix-based U-Haul. There was talk of fighting Major League Baseball's plans for holding the All Star Game in Phoenix next year.

Most of those protests haven't come to fruition. The midsummer classic is still on, a spokeswoman for US Airways said the company saw no effect from the boycott call, and a U-Haul International executive said the same thing.

"In fact, year over year, we're up," said Jim Pena, the rental firm's president for Arizona.

Cities that called for boycotts, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, largely found themselves with few contracts to cancel and little Arizona travel to avoid.
"Ultimately only a few city employees' travel was changed and the few contracts we had with Arizona companies were allowed to go forward for economic reasons," said Tony Winnicker, a spokesman for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. A city of Los Angeles spokeswoman said only a few contracts were not continued, none large.
Still, some Arizona businesses have taken a big hit. In August, officials in Santa Monica, Calif., recommended that Phoenix-based Cavco Industries be awarded a $3 million contract to replace 20 aging mobile homes in a city-owned park. But the city council refused to give the contract to Cavco — the low bidder — because the company is Arizona-based, and Santa Monica had passed a resolution imposing sanctions.
"I don't think that what they did serves any real useful purpose," said company CEO Joe Stegmayer. The homes would have been built at a plant near Phoenix, he said, which would have led to more work for the primarily Hispanic work force there. "I don't think it really meets their objectives of trying to help people in the Hispanic community, for example, or the average working person."

The pain also has been felt by the convention industry. An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for vacations, conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl, pro golf tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism office estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity brought in $16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed in the industry.

An analysis commissioned by the Center for American Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after the signing of the law at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an additional $96 million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the group's vice president for immigration policy and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve as a warning to other states, particularly those who rely on tourism and conferences and conventions, that there is an economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We feel like this is a very modest slice, just a piece of what the economic impact is, and we don't think that we're overstating it or overselling it."

The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D. Pollack & Co. It also found that canceled meetings and conferences could cost the state nearly 2,800 jobs, $87 million in lost wages and more than $250 million in lost economic output over the next two to three years.

The jump in hotel occupancy cheers tourism officials. Visitation at the Grand Canyon went up by nearly 3 percent in June, July and August, compared with the same period in 2009. Arizona hotel occupancy rose by 8.3 percent in June, 2.6 percent in July and 3.4 percent in August, according to Smith Travel Research.

But conventions and the business they spark bring in much more revenue than the leisure market, said Debbie Johnson, president and CEO of the Arizona Hotel & Lodging Association, and the increase in visitation is compared with dismal 2009 occupancy levels that were below national rates.

Comment:

This is really good news. It seems the boycott is basically a fizzle. STAND TOUGH ARIZONA! YOU ARE LEADING THE WAY!

Also it is ironic that what little effect the boycotts are having hurts the Latino community worst of all, as the lost jobs were held primarily by them. It makes one wonder if these other cities are standing up for Latinos in general, or specifically illegals and to hell with the legal Latino immigrants.

The libertards will have to accept that the American people, many of whom are Latino themselves, have had enough of illegal immigration.

Also, it is the libertards who are making this a racial issue. Illegal immigration is just that - ILLEGAL. Race or skin colour has nothing to do with it. White, Black, Brown, Yellow, Purple with Pink Polkadots - it doesn't matter. The United States has immigration laws, and these Mestizos are the ones flaunting them. This is a legal issue, not racial.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Merkel : Multiculturalism In Germany Has Failed

Attempts to build a multicultural society in Germany have “utterly failed”, Chancellor Angela Merkel says.

She said the so-called “multikulti” concept – where people would “live side-by-side” happily – did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate – including learning German.

The comments come amid rising anti-immigration feeling in Germany.

A recent survey suggested more than 30% of people believed the country was “overrun by foreigners”.

The study – by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation think-tank – also showed that roughly the same number thought that some 16 million of Germany’s immigrants or people with foreign origins had come to the country for its social benefits.

http://www.odinistpressservice.com/2...ty-has-failed/

Comment:

Considering Merkel's earlier remark about it being unavoidable that Germany will become a Muslim nation, this is quite a surprise. At last, the Chancellor is admitting a truth that we National Socialists have long understood: Multiculturalism simply does not work.

Humans are "tribal" by nature. We instinctively fear and mistrust those who are "not one of us." We naturally favour our own before outsiders. When different "tribes" are forced to live together, it creates tension and stress which often manifests itself in violence and other crimes.

Is it a coincidence that the crime rate and social violence has skyrocketed the more multicultural we become? NO! Our social ills are nothing more than a symptom of that dreaded disease called multiculturalism. And like a cancer, as it spreads, the symptoms become more pronounced, and more intense.

What's the cure? A return to segregation. It is now a proven fact that peoples of vastly different cultures and social morays CANNOT live together and coexist peacefully as individuals. However, if we return to segregation, it will be easier to live peacefully in our own homelands or regions, and work together as groups, rather than as individuals.

Multiculturalism is an idealistic dream whose time has come - to pass away.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

American Nazi Party Recruitment Video

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Posting On Craig's List

Comrades, last week I began posting ads for the ANP on Craig's List. To my surprise and dismay [insert sarcastic sound here] I was flagged in one day, and deleted in two. I thought, OK, maybe I should omit the Swastika, and just post the ad. I reposted the exact same ad sans the Swastika. Guess what? If you said I was flagged and deleted again you go to the head of the class!

I was extremely careful not to put anything racist or hateful in my ad. Craig's List didn't seem to care. It was put there by the ANP, and that's reason enough. Judge for yourselves and you decide if this is racist and/or hateful.

Are you tired of feeling like a foreigner in your own land? Have you lost your job? Have you lost faith in the government? You are not alone. We want you to help us stop the madness. If you're ready to stop complaining and take action, we want you to join us!

American Nazi Party

National Headquarters
P.O. Box 85942
Westland, Michigan, 48185

California Contact
P.O. Box 2145 Rialto,
California, 92377

visit us on the web at www.anp14.com


I guess everyone is entitled to freedom of speech EXCEPT us. Well, let them keep deleting me. I'll just keep reposting. After all, it only takes five minutes. If they delete my account, I'll simply register again with a different Yahoo email. The ANP isn't going away and they'll just have to get used to it! 88!

Monday, November 15, 2010

Election shows work for Obama to win back voters

By LIZ SIDOTI AND JENNIFER AGIESTA, Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Near the midpoint of his presidency, Barack Obama's diverse voter coalition reveals giant cracks and he faces major work repairing his standing among independents in states crucial to his re-election chances.
Catholics. Older people. Women. Young adults. They shifted toward Republicans in this month's elections and failed to support Obama's Democratic Party as they did in 2008.

Two years before voters render judgment on his tenure, Obama's most critical task may be winning back those who aren't affiliated with a party but who hold enormous sway in close contests. National exit polls from the midterm elections show these voters broke heavily for Republicans after helping elect Obama and Democrats in the two previous elections.

The trouble with this constituency appears even deeper for Obama in places expected to be closely contested in the next White House race, according to an analysis by The Associated Press of exit polls in 26 states. It shows just how much ground Obama must make up with independents between now and November 2012.
"Over the last two years, we've made progress. But clearly too many Americans haven't felt that progress yet," the president said after the election. "As president, I take responsibility for that."

It's impossible to predict a presidential election based on midterm results. That's even truer considering that 131.2 million people voted in 2008, when Obama was elected, compared with 87 million this month, based on an AP tally of official and unofficial results. The slow-moving economic recovery could speed up, lifting Obama and the Democrats.

November's exit-poll responses provide enough hints that Obama could be in serious trouble if he doesn't shore up his support in crucial areas.
"I'm not going to lie to you, I'm frustrated and I blamed him for some of the bad shape this country's in. We're struggling," said Earlene Durham, 32, of St. Louis, sounding like other independents who backed Obama in 2008. "But then I thought, 'Well, he's trying the best he can.' The only thing we can do is wait and see what he does in the next two years. Gotta give the man a chance."
Exit-poll questionnaires vary state to state, but on several issues that dominated the campaign this year, cross-state analyses are possible.

His job performance rating was more negative than positive among voters in states such as Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Obama won them all in 2008. In Indiana, where Obama was the first Democrat to win the state since 1964, just 37 percent approved.

Among independents:

_More said their vote in a Senate race was to express opposition to Obama rather than to show support. This was true in every state where exit polls asked the question, and by margins of 2-to-1 or better in states such as Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

_Majorities disapprove of Obama in all states but California, Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont, which traditionally lean Democratic during a presidential election. Obama's job performance rating is lowest in West Virginia, where 76 percent disapprove. In Indiana, 69 percent of independents disapprove, and in perennially contested Ohio, 65 percent disapprove.

_Most express broad dissatisfaction with how the federal government is working. Roughly four in 10 are angry in Colorado and Missouri, while about one-third feel that way in Indiana, Ohio, Washington state, New Hampshire, Nevada, Wisconsin, Florida and Pennsylvania.

_A chunk said they want the government to do less after two years of Democratic domination in the nation's capital. That's almost a direct reversal of how this voting group behaved in 2008. Majorities of independents in each state surveyed except Democratic-leaning Hawaii said the government is doing too many things better left to the private sector and individuals.

_Supporters outnumber opponents of the tea party coalition in all but Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont. In Missouri, half of independents call themselves tea party backers, compared with 18 percent who oppose it. Nearly half of independents support the movement in 2008 swing states Colorado, Indiana and Ohio.

_More than half say their financial situations got worse in the past two years in Florida, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin. One in seven or less across the states said their financial fortunes have improved during Obama's time in office.

_About four in 10 in six states — Arkansas, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina and Texas — said the $814 billion economic stimulus package hurt the economy. At least half want the health care bill repealed in 20 of 24 states where the question was asked. The exceptions were California, Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont.
"I'm very disappointed," said independent Kris Rickert, 36, of Dousman, Wis., pointing to the skyrocketing national debt. "I understand his philosophy was trying to get the economy going, but I just don't think that's the right way of going about it."

After the election, Obama acknowledged that he's "paying a political price" for failing to make good on his promises to change the way Washington works and slipping in his pledge to "maintain the kind of tone that says we can disagree without being disagreeable."

Over the next two years, a divided government — with Republicans in control of the House and Democrats with a slim majority in the Senate — may give Obama more of an opportunity to shift his policies to the center and again woo independents, by compromising with the GOP. Yet, there's no certainty that will happen; both Obama and House Speaker-in-waiting John Boehner, R-Ohio, have suggested they're willing to compromise but only to a point.

Still, making an effort to change the ways of Washington could score him points with some independents.

"He is a progressive president, but he just doesn't have the chance to put his policies into effect because of the old ways that government works," said Sheree Sifferath, 67, an independent from Gold Canyon, Ariz.

She backed Obama in 2008 but voted for Republican John McCain for the Senate and GOP Rep. Jeff Flake in the midterm elections. She's open to supporting Obama in two years but hopes that he and Republicans can figure out a way to compromise.

"They can make it better if they just work together. They've got to change with the times," she added.
____
Research Coordinator Cliff Maceda with AP Election Research contributed to this report.

Comment:

Mr. Obama has work to do to win back voters? That's an understatement! Considering his approval rating has fallen to about 40%, I'd say he has a hell of a lot of work to do.

Personally, I believe he's going to be a one term president. I doubt he can bring his approval rating back up in time, if at all. On the other hand, it really doesn't make any difference. Democan, Republicrat, different methods, same results. Either way, the White working class will get the shaft. If only enough people would consider a third party candidate. I'm not necessarily talking about an ANP candidate. I'm mean any third party. America's only chance is through National Socialism, but it would be refreshing to see ANY party other than the Democans or the Republicrats win a major office. But that would be difficult. It's like I explained in previous posts. People subconscienciously think of elections like sporting events. When your team wins, you feel like a winner. When your teams loses you feel like a loser. They think the same way with elections, so no one is willing to vote for anyone if they don't have a reasonable chance of winning. That's exactly what the government counts on to help maintain the status quo. We've go to get out there and make people understand that nothing is ever going to change unless we can get rid of the Democams and Republicrats. I know that sounds so unlikely, but we have to at least try.

There are many of us who say that the only solution is a White Revolution. Perhaps they are right. But with me, revolution is a method of last resort. I'm not ready to give up on the idea of winning political offices. This will never happen if we don't work together, with each of us doing their part. Let's get our message out. Hand out or drop off literature. I did 200 flyers and stickers in just a couple of hours. That's not an unreasonable amount of time. I also put an ad on Craig's List. BTW, if you do that, DO NOT include a Swastika. I put up a Swastika with my message, and it was flagged in one day, deleted in two. I reposted WITHOUT the Swastika, and it's still up. Also, talk to people who you think might be interested. And I'm sure there are methods I haven't even thought of yet. The point is, nothing will be accomplished if we just sit on our asses watching the Jew Tube on our time off. COMRADES, LET'S GET ON IT!

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Addendum...

There's one very important matter more that I forgot to include about credit cards. As you may remember, I strongly advised you never to make just minimum payments, as this will get you little or no progress in paying off your balance. However, with some cards, you can even lose ground by making minimum payments, even if you don't charge anything more.

If you feel you just can't make anything more than the minimum, at least check your monthly accrued interest and monthly finance charge (the fee they charge to manage your account), plus any other fees those vultures may tack on, and add them up. If they equal, or are less than the minimum payment, then you're alright. However, if those charges exceed the minimum payment, then your balance will rise, even though you haven't used your card. Many years ago, this happened to me with my Discover card. To my regret, I 'discovered' this was the case. I didn't pay close enough attention to my bill. I made minimum payments for about 3 months, and then I received a monthly statement with an over-the-limit fee. I'm thinking, WTF?!
I called customer service and we went over things, and it turned out the minimum payment was less than the monthly interest and fees. Don't let this happen to you. If you are going to make minimum payments, at least make certain it will cover your monthly interest and fees or you'll be digging your grave even deeper!

No Offense!

Because my last post was so late, and can be of great value, I'm delaying my next post. Many people tend not to scroll down the page very far, and I want to make certain that everyone sees the ones on banking, and getting out of debt.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

How To Legally Get Out Of Debt

First of all, you must realise that there is nothing dishonest or dishonourable about freeing yourself from financial slavery. It's true that you were the one who got yourself into debt, but there's no question that you were baited into it. You see examples on TV every day. Things like, "You know you want it!" or "Why wait? Get it now!", but my favourite is the one where they tell you that all the most beautiful women will go crazy for you if you buy such-and-such a product. Unfortunately, too many men fall for that one all too easily.

Method number one is good old fashioned bankruptcy. Now I'll bet some of you actually cringed when you read that word. That's exactly how the banks want you to react. They want you to feel that bankruptcy is cheating them, dishonourable, and it means you're a complete failure. Bankruptcy is NOT a dirty word. It does not mean you're a failure. It's a legal right every American has. Do you think that banks and big businesses hesitate to use bankruptcy if it will benefit them? You better believe they don't!

Bankrutcy offers people the chance to start over again. However, you must realise that if you do declare bankrutcy, you will have no credit for a time. But then again, you don't want to get sucked back in to debt again, so perhaps that's best. Also, I should point out straightaway that bankruptcy does NOT get you out of taxes, or student loans. That makes sense if you think about it. You basically owe your student loan to the government and taxes to the IRS. They're not going to tell you that you don't have to pay them, are they? That'd be crazy! They might work with you more so you can make they payments, but they're certainly not going to let you off the hook. But as to credit card debt, it'll be all gone. Personal loans too, and even car loans. Not mortgages, unless you're willing to give up your house. But they will order the banks to work with you so you can make they payments.

Many people don't know how to go about it. They think they're so far in debt that they can't afford to hire an attorney. The average fee for bankruptcy is $1000. They'll allow you to make payments, and once you make your first payment, you are no longer legally obligated to make any payments to any creditor. So if you want to keep your house, a lawyer is advisable. He'll see to it that the court orders the bank to work with you, even if it means changing the payment terms so you can make your payments.

If you don't own any real estate, it's easy. Hiring an attorney is a waste of money. I'm speaking from experience. I declared bankruptcy two years ago. My attorney did nothing for me that I couldn't have done myself. I owned a house with a mortgage, and a mobile home I owned outright. I kept the mobile home, and literally handed the house back to the bank. Such a procedure is call "Deed In Lieu Of Payment." It just means I gave the house back and they tore up the mortgage. I didn't want to keep it. It was too much trouble. Also, when it came to the hearing itself, he did nothing. The commissioner asked me several standard questions like, "How much do you earn." "How much do you owe?" "Do you own any stocks?" "Any real estate, and if so, do you want to keep it?" Very straightforward. I answered them on my own.

You don't even need an attorney to stop the creditors from calling. If your bank or a collection agency is calling you at home or work, all you have to do is send them a letter telling them to stop calling. If they don't, you can sue them for harrassment. They can still send you letters. Even a lawyer can't stop them from mailing you.

As to the paperwork, places like Office Depot and Staples sell bankruptcy kits for about $25. They contain all the forms you need, instructions on how to fill them out, and where to go to file them. Filing fees may vary from state-to-state. When I filed here in California, two years ago, the fee was $300. You can't make payments. But from the moment you file, you no longer have to pay your credit card bills, so you should be able to afford it. It's a small price to pay to get out of financial slavery. Oh, and if you have a credit card that isn't maxed out, and you'd like to have one for emergencies, you have the option of excluding one or more cards from the bankruptcy. Naturally, if you do this, you are still obligated to make the payments on that card. Just be careful. Use it for extreme emergencies only. Don't get suckered into debt again.

The next method is to simply stop making your payments. Only do this with credit cards. If you do it with your house, it will go into foreclosure, and your car will be repossessed. When your cards go to collection agencies, they will call you. Now collection agencies buy your debt from banks at pennies on the dollar. For example, if you owe $10,000, they probably bought it for $1000. You can usually get them to acept half of what you actually owe. The one trouble of this is you must pay it in one lump sum. If you can't, they must by law work with you to make the payments affordable. The banks don't. If you don't pay them on time, they can send you to collections, but collection agencies DO have to work with you by law.

Also, never forget, collection agents are not your friends, no matter how pleasant or friendly they seem. They couldn't care less about you. They've heard every sob story in the book. They are paid a percentage of what they collect from you, and that's all they care about. BTW, if they don't contact you within two years of your last payment to the bank, the statute of limitations expires and you no longer have to pay them. However, they will try and trick you. If you agree to pay them, then you are legally obligated to even if the statute of limitations has expired. Just asking if you can make payments implies you agree to pay. As these calls are always recorded, you'll be stuck. If you know two years has passed, you tell them you are aware of the law, and to stop bothering you or you'll sue for harrassment. If they know you know all your rights, they usually back down. If they think they have you intimidated, they'll really get aggressive.

Finally, my next method is loan consolidation. This is my least favourite method. You'll only have to make one payment a month, but it will be substantial, however, not as high as all your credit cards put together. You'll still be paying exorbitant interest rates to a thieving bank, plus you must cut up all your credit cards. If you don't, you'll find yourself drowning in debt again before you know it.
You'll have credit card payments, plus your consolidation loan payment and you'll really be screwed.

Remember, one of the worst things you can do is make minimum payments. This only pays your monthly interest and finance charges (the fee for managing your account - that's right, you have to pay the banks for the priveledge of being in debt), plus a little off the principle (the actual debt). That way, your balance stays high, and you have to keep paying month after month, year after year. For example, if you have say, four credit cards and owe a combined amount of $10,000, and you made only minimum payments to each, it would take you about 50 years to pay them all off - assuming you didn't charge anything else.

This is true financial slavery, or as it used to be called, indentured servitude - you work to pay off a debt. And like they did back in the day, it's all fixed to keep you that way as long as possible. The worst part is that it's all 100% LEGAL! So if they can screw you legally, why shouldn't you screw them legally?

If you want to learn even more, I recommend a book written by Kevin Trudeau called, "Debt Cures 'They' Don't Want You To Know About." You may have seen his infomercials on the Jew Box from time to time. You can also find it on Amazon.com. BTW I am in no way connected with Mr. Trudeau, and I will not profit in any way if you buy his book. It just contains much more detailed information than I've given you, and many more ways to legally get out of debt.

One last way not in Mr. Trudeau's book is the ANP and 21st Century National Socialism. In a National Socialist state, we would create a strong economy, seperate from the Global Economy, with a sound public employment program, and an independant currency apart from the control of the international banking cartels such as the Rothschilds.

This is not idealistic dreaming. It has happened before in 1930's Germany. That is why it was so vital to the international banking community that Hitler and the NSDAP be destroyed at ANY cost and control of Europe be returned to the Rothschilds, and the other banking cartels. BTW, the Rothschild cartel, which is a Jewish owned and controlled financial empire, controls two thirds of the world's wealth. Since then, they gained nearly complete control of the entire civilised world. By working with the ANP and embracing National Socialism, we have a last chance to break that control. If you have not already done so, we need you to join us now before it's too late. Time is running out. It's up to you, and all White Workers. Freedom, or financial slavery. What's it going to be comrades?

Disclamer: I am not an attorney. I am not advising you to take any specific legal action. I've just given you some important information. How you proceed is your choice. However, in addition to my teaching credentials, I also hold a paralegal certificate from California State University, San Bernardino. I have never actually worked as a paralegal. Taking all those law classes really showed me how corrupt the system is, and in the end, I wanted no part of it.

I Got Screwed!

First of all, I must apologise comrades. I promised to explain how you can get out of credit card debt and legally screw the banks that have been screwing us for years.
You will get that article but it will have to be later in the day.

Earlier, I was trying to download some graphics for a recruitment video I have in mind, when suddenly, a notice comes up saying I have downloaded something malicious. Then, miraculously, another notice appears saying if I click on the box, I can download free software to fix the problem. Yeah right! Well, everything is messed up so what else could I do? I download this free software. I run the program. Then it tells me the problem is too severe for the free version. I'll of course have to purchase the full version. I don't even have the option of saying no. I can't get off that page unless I click the purchase button.

They mess up my computer on purpose, and I'm supposed to pay them to fix it. NO BLOODY WAY! Comrades, this is a perfect example of Judeo-Capitalist greed. I won't do it!

I tried everything I could think of, like system restore. Nothing. All I could do was wipe my computer and reinstall windows. That worked fine. The problem is, I lost everything that I hadn't backed up, including the article. Fortunately, I had put all my reference material and notes on my cruzer, so that's alright. All I have to do is rewrite the article. That's going to take at least an hour and it's almost 1:30 AM. Since tomorrow is Saturday and I don't have to work, I'll do it in the morning. I'll try and have it posted by 2:00 PM Pacific Time. Hey, I like to sleep in on Saturday. Don't you?

Friday, November 12, 2010

Judeo-Capitalist Banking In 21st Century America

I'm sure most of you have received invitations to take out a credit card in the mail. Most of them say right on the envelope, "You're Pre-Approved!" BTW, if I'm pre-approved, how come when I responded to some of them, I was declined? Doesn't pre-approved mean you're already approved? Well, to you and me that's what it means, but to the banks, it must mean that we've been approved to apply, not approved to get a credit card.

The banks spend a fortune every year and send out four billion of these invitations. You read that right, four billion. I hope you have the good sense to throw them away. I've been caught in the credit trap before, and I won't ever again. Right now I have one card for emergencies. As of yesterday, the balance is $0.00. If I have to use it, I pay it off ASAP. Making minimum payments is what they want you to do. It keeps your balance high, and you owing them month after month. It literally makes you a debt slave. Credit is a trap, plain and simple. Sometimes we need credit like when we take out a mortgage to buy a house, or a loan to buy a new car. That's not quite the same thing. If you can't pay, they foreclose on your house or repossess your car and and then you're free of them. BTW, if you have a car repossessed, and they tell you they sold it at auction for less than the loan, and you owe the balance, don't believe it. THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT. When they repossess a car, you are free of the debt unless you agree to pay the balance. When they call you to tell you you owe a balance after repossession, the moment you agree to pay, you are screwed. Asking if you can make payments is the same as agreeing. Remember, they record these calls, so they'll have you on tape. So if your car is repossessed and they call you to tell you that you still owe something, tell them you refuse to pay. If they threaten to mess up your credit rating, you have the right to sue them for harrassment. Personally, I don't trust the courts, but as long as they know you are fully aware of your rights, they usually will back down. It's when they think you don't know anything, that they get aggressive with you. Always bear in mind that collection agencies are not your friend no matter how friendly and pleasant they seem. All they care about is getting you to pay them money, whether you legally have to or not.

What I'm telling you to avoid like the plague is unsecured debt, like credit cards. You can find yourself drowning in debt before you know it, which is exactly what the banks want. Banks are making billions of dollars every year by ripping off honest White workers every year. Not just Whites either. The only colour banks can see is green. Every type of lending institution from big banks to payday loans are designed to screw us out of our money.

Over the last 30 years, the consumer lending industry has spiralled out of control. Who is responsible? Mainly the federal government. They helped to create the monster called Tyrannosaurus Debt. The American credit card industry alone makes an obscene profit of $30 billion every year, and they still want more!

Debt is epidemic in this country, and the goverment and big business are in this together. It began with the annual percentage rate (APR), then usury interest at exorbitant rates. Now we have fees on top of fees. There's the late fee, the over-the-limit-fee, the credit limit increase fee, paper billing fee, and any fee they can think of to stick you with. Now with interest, there are legal limits. Right now, there are few, if any limits on fees. They can charge you whatever they want, fee-wise, and it's 100% LEGAL.

This current practice of fees on top of fees is specifically designed to keep you in debt for life. Once-upon-a-time, crediters sent people to debter's prison for non-payment. Today, that's the last thing they want. It's very simple: You work, you pay, you sit in prison, you don't pay. There is another term for this: Indentured servitude. We work to pay off debts. The problem is that the system is geared so that it is very difficult to pay off these debts what with interest and endless usury fees.

Way back in the day, Judeo-Capitalist corporations in isolated areas had what is called "The Company Store." Especially before the invention of the car, most of the workers had no way of travelling five, ten, or more miles to a regular store. They had to buy food and other living neccessities at the company store. The company had it all worked out. The prices at these stores were so exorbitant, that you couldn't support yourself. So they'd extend you credit with an obscene interest rate. Also, it was illegal to quit your job if you owed the company store money. But if you couldn't support yourself and your family before they extended you credit, how were you supposed to do it and make payments on your loan? You couldn't, as simple as that. You were literally a slave to that company.

A century or more later, little has changed. How many of you are terrified of losing your job because of all of your debt? I don't mean paying your rent or mortgage. Ever since we left the cave, there's almost always been rent or mortgages. I'm not even talking about groceries or utilities. Those are payments for goods and services. I'm talking primarily about credit card debt. Most Americans are scared to death of being unable to make the payment. Many of you are terrified of being eaten by Tyrannosaurus Debt. Well let me tell you comrades, you're being eaten by that greedy beast even if you're making your payments.

How can you legally get out of debt? I'll give you some legal answers tomorrow. But I'll tell you this right now. One of those methods is the ANP and 21st Century National Socialism.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Why Communism Doesn't Work

What is Communism? Simplistically put, it's basically a forced sharing of the wealth. Those who have, are forced to share with those who haven't. If you're poor, it sounds like a good deal, doesn't it? For the non-working poor, it's a great deal, but for the working poor and middle class, it really stinks. And over the long haul, it simply cannot work. Why? Because of human nature.

It is human nature to seek the path of least resistance. For example, if you have to walk one mile to get to your destination, and you have two paths, one is uphill all the way, and the other is downhill all the way, most people will choose the downhill path. It's the easiest. Why walk uphill when you can walk downhill? Which sounds easier: Working for $1900 a month, or getting $1700 a month in government benefits? For just $200 a month less, you don't have to do anything. What would the average person choose? The problem is, as more people "get in the system" and stop working, others see this and say, "Gee, maybe I should play the system too. Why should I work while they don't?" As more and more people get on benefits, there are fewer people working and paying into the system, which eventually makes it impossible for the government to sustain itself. That's exactly what's happening in America right now. It's gotten so bad, that total collapse is immenent, and unavoidable unless we make a drastic change and RIGHT NOW!

A few days ago, the newspapers ran one of the best pieces of "A Slice Of Rye" ever. I don't have a copy so I'll just paraphrase. It seems there was a college professor who said that once he failed an entire class. His students insisted that communism could work if it was just given a fair chance. This conservative professor (which is a rarety in higher education) decided to teach them why communism can't work over the long haul. The next test he gave, it seems that everyone of them got B. He told his students that since communism is basically a forced sharing of wealth, he would demonstrate his point by forced sharing of grades. He averaged the scores of the entire class, which came out to be a B, and everyone got Bs. The students who didn't study much were of course delighted. The ones who studied hard were angry that the ones who didn't apply themselves very hard got good grades because these students were benefitting from the hard work of others. As the semester went on, the average scores for each test got lower and lower. It seems that the hard working students didn't appreciate having to carry the lazier ones. By the end of the semester, everyone was failing.

To add insult to injury, the lazier students actually blamed the students who were originally hard working for their failure. The lazy students felt that they had every right to benefit from the hard work of others, yet should not be required to work themselves. Sound familiar? This is going on in America right now. Those who don't want to work feel they have a right to benefit from those who do. As a result, more and more of those who do work are getting tired of having to work, while others live off of their sweat, and figure, "If they don't have to work, then neither should I."

Communism gives no incentive for people to work, if they know the government will carry them. A country cannot sustain itself indefinitely this way. That's why the Soviet Union fell apart. That's why Red China is now moving away from communism, and towards capitalism, which is just as bad. By embracing the Judeo-Capitalist system, they are giving the illusion of prosperity to their people, but in the end, they will end up in the same sorry state as the United States. The Chinese have simply traded one corrupt system for another. All this will achieve is a postponment of the inevitable. Since the United States is their number one customer, what do you think will happen to their economy when we reach the point of total collapse? They will lose their main source of income, and since they have invested, borrowed, and leveraged themselves to fund their new capitalist ventures, they too will find themselves totally screwed.

Communism and capitalism are both systems designed by Jews. They are two sides of the same corrupt coin. We need a new coin. That coin is 21st Century National Socialism. Through National Socialism, we can develop an economy independent of the international banking cartels. We can develop a public employment program which can turn our near bankrupt economy into the strongest in the world. This is not idealistic dreaming. Such a thing has already successfully happened once before. National Socialism turned a bankrupt Germany, stripped of all overseas colonies and crippled by war-reparations into the strongest economy in Europe in just four years. That was why it was so essential to the banking community that Hitler and his National Socialist government be destroyed at any cost. It of course was, and once again the control of Germany and Europe was returned to the control of the Rothschilds and other banking cartels.

Since 1945, the banking cartels have sunk their claws even deeper into the flesh of the working class, and since the 1960's, the White working class in particular. For example, the Rothschild banking cartel controls two thirds of the wealth of the entire world!

Since this post is starting to get too long, I'll stop here. In my next post, I'll give you some information I read about some American banking institutions that just infuriated me. To make matters even more galling, most of the things I'll be telling you about are 100% LEGAL!

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

REMINDER!

Don't forget everyone, that sometime between midnight tonight and 1:00 AM, the address of this blog will change to www.americannaziparty.blogspot.com

If at that time you type in that address and this blog DOESN'T come up, it means that for some reason I was not able to change the address and it will still be at this one.

I was told I could change it for free, but I've never tried it. I'll have to wait until midight or thereabouts before I'm sure whether it will work or not. It should work, but you never know.

Anonymous Posting Is Now Allowed

Like I've said umpteen times, I'm by far an expert on computers and blogs. A very good comrade has informed me that anonymous comments were not allowed. I was totally unaware of this. I have corrected the problem. If you wish to remain anonymous, then you may do so. I'm sorry it took so long for me to become aware of this, but I lost my "Computers For Dummies" book, and I really need it! I apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused.

You know, I was wondering why I was getting so much traffic, but so few comments. Duh, now I know!

The Time Has Come The Walrus Said...

That was a line from Lewis Carroll. I just wanted to make sure I got your attention because this is really important.

If you remember, last week I said I was going to change my URL because it had Aryan Nations in it. Well, I checked into my options. From my research, it seems the easiest is to just go in to the settings/publishing page and change the address.

I hate to have to be bothered, plus possibly put you to some inconvenience, but it really should be done. After all, there is going to be a link on the ANP website for my blog, and I know it would be preferred if the address did not say Aryan Nations. Makes sense. So get ready folks, this will happen VERY soon, just not today (11/10/10). It will be midnight tomorrow (11/11/10)

I was told that when I do it, there will be a page redirecting people to the new address, but just in case there isn't, the new address is www.americannaziparty.blogspot.com You can also find it by Googling either "National Socialism - Sense And Sensibility" or "Dan Schruender" or probably
"Nazi or National Socialism".

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Democrats: How Demographic Change Is Changing Political Power

11/5/10

Overtly racially-based opinion polling, conducted by the Latino-only La Raza organization’s “Latino Decisions” showed that Hispanics voted for Democrats over Republicans by a three to one margin, reflecting the fact that the nonwhite invasion of America is shifting the balance of power away from whites.

According to Latino Decisions’ Gary Segura, “Latinos may have saved the Senate for Democrats. They certainly saved Harry Reid — about 10 percent of the overall vote in Nevada were Latinos voting Democrat.”

Mr. Segura added that “Overwhelmingly, Latino voters were there to support the Latino community instead of either party and felt that the immigration debate and accompanying anti-Latino sentiment drove them to the polls on Election Day.”

In other words, Latinos voted racially, something which the media and their liberal allies accept as perfectly normal but which would be the subject of much condemnation had whites voted racially — and then boasted about it in an organization called “the race.”

The Latino Decisions’ polling, which was sponsored by National Council of La Raza (NCLR), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and pro-immigration lobby America’s Voice, found that immigration issues were critical in driving Latino voters to the polls this election.

The America’s Voice website, for example, boasted that the “Latino firewall” prevented Republicans from winning seats in the West.

“Democrats have seen a pattern of losing majorities in both the House and the Senate. However, not this year; thanks to the Latino firewall in the West — motivated perhaps by some candidate’s views on immigration and some smart voter mobilization efforts — the Democrats were able to keep control of the Senate, not to mention the Governors’ races in California and Colorado,” that website said.

According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice, “Latino voters delivered in the 2010 elections. Were it not for the Latino firewall in the West, these midterms would have conformed to past ‘change’ elections, which have seen both houses of Congress swept from power.

“Instead, this time, Latinos kept the Senate in Democratic hands and played a key factor in helping Democrats win the governors’ races in California and Colorado.”

Similarly, Clarissa Martinez De Castro, director of Immigration and National Campaigns at National Council of La Raza (NCLR), said, “Latinos in 2010 reaffirmed their influential role in American politics both as voters and candidates,” and pointed to the choice confronting the Republican Party in recapturing lost ground among Latino voters for the 2012 elections and beyond.

She added, by way of what some might suggest to be bordering on blackmail, that “Republicans have an option — continue to let extremist leaders define their stance on immigration or come to the table and present a clear solution to the immigration issue.”

Mike Garcia, president of SEIU United Service Workers West (USWW), boasted how Latino voters provided the winning margin in California for Governor-elect Jerry Brown (D-CA) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA).

“The politics we see now in California give a glimpse to the political future in other western states. In California, where more than one in five voters are Latino, there’s no doubt that Meg Whitman’s anti-immigrant stance cost her the election,” Mr. Garcia said.

Comment:

This, then, is the future facing America unless the immigration invasion is brought under control.

America will become an extension of Mexico, or it will retain its European core. Comrades, it's up to us. It's time to make a stand. The best place to do this is the ANP. It took me nearly two years to realise this. I hope those of you who aren't already with us won't make the same mistakes that I made. Learn from my mistakes, and stand with us now.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Late Breaking Election News

I know it's a little late, and I should have found out about this earlier, but I didn't. For me, my first choice for the election was to win. My second choice, was for incumbent and school board chairman John Kazalunas to lose. I got my second choice! Twenty year board member Kazalunas is out!

Perhaps the people listened to me after all, even if I only received 10% of the vote. One of my points in my campaignwas that 20 years is TOO LONG IN ANY OFFICE, even if Kazalunas was the best board chairman in the entire world.

Indeed, if you look at the results nationwide, you'll notice that a huge number of incumbents took a beating, and many others won by just a hair. However, since most people vote Democan or Republicrat, it doesn't really matter. In Chairman Suhayda's latest ANP report, he compares the two major parties to Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. Two sides of the same coin. What we need is a different coin. That coin is called National Socialism. NS is a system that cares for it's people, and doesn't exploit them. We put our own Folk first. I don't want to say anymore on this, as I would just be paraphrasing Chairman Suhayda. I recommend that as soon as you finish here, you go to our main website and read his entire report, if you haven't already done so.

BTW, Rocky warns that we should all get out and do our literature handouts while we can, before the cold weather really sets in. Well, to all my northern and eastern comrades, this is the one good thing about living in Southern California. Cold weather? Ha-Ha! It really got cold today. I ALMOST had to wear a jacket. Last night the temerature plunged to 68 degrees. Brrrrrr! Last year, my family and I could have eaten Thanksgiving dinner in the park without jackets. California may be a cesspool of corruption, surpassed only by New York and Washington D.C., but at least we don't freeze in the winter. On the other hand, we do roast in the summer. Anyone ever experienced 125 degree heat? I have out in Palm Springs. San Bernardino is only about 45 minutes from Palm Springs. In the summer around here, air conditioning is a necessity!

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Reminder

I hope everyone remembered to set your clocks back one hour! Spring forward, fall back.

White American Workers Put Last Once Again

11/1/10

Non-Hispanic whites lost 986,000 jobs over the last year while 392,000 foreign-born Hispanic immigrants gained jobs, a new report from the Pew Hispanic Center has shown.

The 986,000 white job losses make up the overwhelming majority of the U.S.-born job loss total which reached 1.2 million over the past year, the report said.

The unemployment rate amongst whites rose during this time period from 7.7 percent to 8 percent.

Immigrant whites, on the other hand, gained 214,000 jobs, pushing their unemployment rate down from 7 percent to 6.3 percent. This figure must be taken with caution, as the federal government still officially classifies all North Africans and Middle Easterners as “Caucasian.”

As a result, the “real” white immigrant figure is probably less than the official estimate.

Some 656,000 new immigrants of all races and ethnicities gained work in the U.S., with 392,000 foreign-born Hispanic immigrants forming the largest block of that group.

Unemployment amongst the foreign-born Hispanic population fell from 11 percent to 10.1 percent in the same period this year, the report continued.

At the same time, the unemployment rate amongst U.S.-born Latinos rose from 12.9 percent to 14 percent, meaning that immigrant Hispanics appear to have even taken jobs from those born here.

That statistic by itself proves the fundamental flaw in the “cheap immigrant labor contributes to the economy” principle as all it does is add to the welfare burden on all sides.

The report went on to point out that the unemployment rate for immigrant workers fell from 9.3 percent to 8.7 percent, while for native-born workers, it rose from just over 9 percent to nearly 10 percent.

Even among ethnic groups, there were stark differences between the numbers of native- and foreign-born workers who found jobs between June last year and the same month this year.

The same dividing line between job gains and losses among native- and foreign-born was also seen in the non-Hispanic white population and among black Americans.

Employment for U.S.-born blacks fell by 142,000 in the first year of the recovery, pushing their unemployment rate up from 15.4 percent to more than 16 percent.

Unemployment fell from 11.4 percent to 10.7 percent among foreign-born blacks, meanwhile, as they gained 81,000 jobs.

Asians born in America were the only group in which “native-born” workers outperformed immigrants in the job market.

U.S.-born Asians gained 208,000 jobs in the 12 months since June 2009, while Asian immigrants lost 102,000 jobs in the same period.

On all accounts, then, white American workers have been put to the back of the queue — in the country which they and their forefathers created.

Comment:

Yet again, the famous double standard. In the process of "helping disenfrancised minorities" become franchised, the White Worker is taking their place. The liberals would say that it's just an effort to help minorities succeed. However, in the process, the Whites are failing! We are literally trading places. Their success is being purchased at the price of ours.

Comrades, we must stand up for ourselves. No more White Guilt. No more letting them break our spirits. One of the most common afflictions amongst Whites in America today is what is known as "The Stockholm Syndrome." That's when kidnappers begin to identify with their captors. The real victims in America today are the Whites. Yet how many Whites seem to identify with the non-Whites and say, "We owe it to them to help them succeed no matter what it may cost us."?

We owe the non-Whites nothing! We must stand up for ourselves. We must let them know we won't take it any longer. We must let them know we're not going to go away.
With National Socialism and the American Nazi Party we can accomplish this. Aside from a few disorganised groups that are little more than a rabble, the ANP is the only one who can fight these attacks on the White Working class.

As Commander Rockwell once said, "Take a stand White man, or stand out of the way!"