Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Obama Wants Change to Allow Thousands of Illegals to Stay in US

REUTERS
8/27/10

PHOENIX - A shake-up in immigration policy may lead to deportation proceedings being dropped for thousands of aliens who entered the United States illegally but are applying to stay in the country, officials said on Friday.

They said the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) seeks to end deportation proceedings against detained illegal immigrants who have applications pending to become legal U.S. residents, if agents determine they have no criminal history and do not present a security threat.

The policy shift emerged from an internal memorandum ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton sent last week to the agency's principal legal adviser and a director of enforcement and removal operations.

The memo was published by the New York Times on Friday and confirmed to Reuters by officials.

Morton said the policy aimed to reduce the backlog in immigration courts, where authorities identified some 17,000 cases last year that could be eliminated if ICE dropped removal proceedings against illegal immigrants who had applied for legal status and were very likely to get it.

The issue of what to do with nearly 11 million illegal immigrants living and working in the shadows in the United States has become an increasingly hot topic in the run up to the midterm elections in November, where Democratic control of Congress is on the line.

President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats back a comprehensive reform of immigration policy to tighten border security, while allowing illegal immigrants in good standing the chance to learn English, pay a fine and get on a path to citizenship.

Republicans say that policy is effectively "amnesty" and likely to encourage more illegal entrants.

The Obama administration has made a priority of arresting and deporting illegal immigrants convicted of crimes, more than 167,00 of whom have been removed so far this year.

ICE spokesman Richard Rocha said the policy shift outlined in the memorandum sought to enable the agency to prioritize "the arrest and removal of criminal aliens and those who pose a danger to national security."

"ICE is not engaged in a 'backdoor' amnesty and has placed more people in immigration proceedings this year than ever before," he added.

Americans are most concerned about a stuttering economy and high unemployment in the run up to the November 2 midterm elections, when voters will elect 435 members of the House of Representatives and fill 37 of the 100 seats in the Senate.

But illegal immigration has also been a contentious issue.

The Obama administration last month successfully sued to block key parts of a tough state law in Arizona requiring state and local police during the course of an arrest to investigate the immigration status of people they suspected were in the state illegally.

The measure, which sought to curb illegal immigration and smuggling-related crime in the state bordering Mexico, was backed by a solid majority of voters both in Arizona and across the United States.

But it came under heavy fire from civil rights and Latino groups concerned that in practice it would lead to profiling, and in court the administration said it intruded on what should be a matter of federal policy.

Comment:

NO WAY! SEND THEM BACK NOW! If they do get to stay, at least require them to learn English as one of the conditions. But I still say they're criminals in just being here.

America is broke. We can no longer afford to support the influx of mass immigrants from Turd World Countries. It's like the Salvation Army at Christmas. Even though they are totally legitimate and do a lot of good, if you honestly don't have any money, you can't donate to them. Same with the Turd Worlders. We don't have the funds or jobs to take care of them.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Nickelodean Admits Indroctrinating Children To Multiculturalism

AP
8/27/10

NEW YORK - Don't underestimate her just because she's a little girl. "Dora The Explorer" is a multibillion-dollar franchise that may be creating a more enlightened generation, more open to different people and cultures not their own.

Ten years have passed since the Latina Dora became the first bilingual heroine of children's TV and conquered the hearts of kids around the world. Nickelodeon has celebrated the anniversary with a one-hour special that features the voices of Rosie Perez, John Leguizamo and Hector Elizondo, and a documentary with comments from Dora herself, the series' creators, experts from the industry, real-life kids and celebrities such as Salma Hayek and Shakira.

"I think that the fact that kids are identifying with a kid with darker color skin that speaks another language (shows they are more open)," said Chris Gifford, one of the show's creators and executive producers. "Kids want their parents to read them the books and watch Dora with them. ... That's what it's about."

"Dora The Explorer" is seen today in 151 markets and is translated to 30 languages. In English-speaking countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland, Dora teaches Spanish; in other markets - including the Hispanic U.S. markets - the adventurous little girl teaches English.

According to Nickelodeon, "Dora" has generated over $11 billion in worldwide sales since 2002, having sold 65 million units of Fisher Price Dora the Explorer toys, 50 million books and over 20 million DVDs worldwide. In France, publishing house Albin Michel has sold more than 12 million educational Dora books since its launch - or one Dora book for every child in France, the network points out.

Yet, the original idea for the show had nothing to do with a bilingual girl.

"She didn't start as a Latina or a heroine - she was a forest animal," said co-creator and executive producer Valerie Walsh Valdes. "Nickelodeon actually asked us to consider making her a Latina because a recent study said that there were no positive bilingual characters on children's television."

So producers turned to such experts as historian Carlos E. Cortes, author of "The Children Are Watching" and "The Making - and Remaking - of a Multiculturalist."

"He was absolutely instrumental in helping us find the best way to put Dora forward in terms of culture," said Gifford. Cortes advised that Dora should always be inclusive, so producers decided not to give her a particular country of origin.

"I am delighted with the way 'Dora' has come out, particularly the impact it seems to be having in young people," said Cortes, professor emeritus of history at the University of California, Riverside. "The Latino kids take pride having Dora as a lead character and non-Latino kids can embrace someone different."

"I think that Dora has a very specific special relationship with kids at home, not necessarily for being bilingual but as a powerful character who invites kids on adventures," says Brown Johnson, president, Animation, Nickelodeon and MTVN Kids and Family Group. "Here, Spanish words open doors."

In "Dora The Explorer," the Latin flavor is present not only in the language and Dora's features but also in characters such as Isa the Iguana and Tico the Squirrel, scenes, themes and family values. The little star invites her young, preschool viewers to come with her on an adventure, where she usually faces a problem that she cannot resolve by herself.

Dora asks her audience to answer questions in an interactive show that includes silences that are long enough for viewers to suggest an answer.

"The kids are feeling good about putting together the puzzle bridge (that will solve the problem). ... Dora needs THEIR help!" says Walsh Valdes.

Each episode relies on the advice of educators and cultural experts, and can take more than a year to produce, in part because not one gets into the air without first being screened in front of the most honest and feared jury: at least 75 children. "Just the heartbreak to see those kids disappointed! We really take it personally. ... These 3 year olds," Gifford said. They really listen to the children, said Walsh Valdes.

Dora's voice has been portrayed the last three years by Caitlin Sanchez. The 14-year-old succeeded the original voice of Dora, Kathleen Herles, when she left to go to college.

"It's really an honor to play an icon," said Sanchez, who enjoys making the voice of the Latina idol in front of her little fans, who immediately recognize it: "It's Dora!" "She's got Dora inside her mouth!"

"Dora is like the most helping person in the world," the young actress said. "I have learned a lot from her, too. ... She's a great role model."

Stars such as Angelina Jolie and Salma Hayek have spoken about the relationship of Dora with their families.

"There's a 'Dora The Explorer' (episode) where Dora's mom has twins - a boy and a girl," Jolie told People magazine in 2008, noting how her older children got ready for the arrival of her own twins. "They watched that a lot."

"I love Dora! She's been such a part of my relationship with my child," said Hayek at the show's 10th anniversary press conference in March. "I love that it's bilingual and that she's a heroine who has Latin roots."

Meanwhile, a Dora balloon made its debut in Macy's 2005 Thanksgiving Day Parade in New York, the first time for a Latino character.

"It's flattering, but it also speaks about how Dora has transcended from just being a preschool show. There's something really amazing in her ability to cross over," said Walsh Valdes.

"Dora" has aired against the backdrop of the immigration debate. When the new Arizona law was announced, a photo of Dora behind bars as a suspected illegal immigrant made the rounds on the Internet.

Such is the influence of Dora, Cortes said, that future fans could affect the political future of America. A 5-year-old viewer in 2000 is now 15.

"It will be another three years until they go to college and be able to vote, and I think we may see a difference. You can't be certain, but our hope is that young people of all backgrounds will be more open," he said. "If Dora can do that, her impact is unimaginable."

Comment:

Dora behind bars?! NOW THAT'S FUNNY!

Unfortunately, Cortes is quite right. They have done an excellent job of brainwashing the children, and when they become voters, we will all be paying the price - unless we stop them in the near future. Time is running out folks. It's now or never!

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Guard troops to deploy to Arizona border on Monday

AP
8/27/10


PHOENIX - The first of 532 National Guard troops are set to begin their mission in the southern Arizona desert on Monday under President Barack Obama's plan to beef up U.S.-Mexico border security, although they won't have any law enforcement authority.

Authorities would not say how many troops would start Monday, but said waves of them will be deploying every Monday until all 532 are on the Arizona border, likely by the end of September. In May, Obama ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to boost security along the border.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has said the first of 224 National Guard troops allocated for his state have finished their training and are expected to be deployed to the state's border on Wednesday.

Troops in New Mexico were in different stages of training and don't yet know when they'll be deployed on the border. A Texas National Guard spokesman did not immediately return a call for comment.

The troops will be "extra eyes and ears" for U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents, and though they will have guns for self-defense, they will not have the authority to arrest anyone, said Arizona National Guard spokesman Lt. Valentine Castillo.

He said if troops spot illegal immigrants, they must report them to the Border Patrol, whose agents would make the arrest.

The troops will be stationed in the desert at "strategic locations" along the border, he said, but did not provide specifics.

Mario Escalante, a spokesman for the Border Patrol's Tucson sector, said the troops will use binoculars, night-vision equipment, remote cameras and computers to conduct surveillance on the border, and will have radios to communicate with Border Patrol agents.

They'll be set up at high points in various locations in the desert, he said.

"Having those resources and deploying them adequately makes us more effective," he said.

Obama was all but compelled to act on illegal immigration after the passage of a tough new Arizona law thrust the border problem into the public spotlight.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer cited government inaction when she signed the law, which reignited that national illegal immigration debate, caused the governor's popularity to soar in the state and turned her into a national figure.

The law went into effect July 29 after a judge ruled to block its most controversial sections, including a part that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. Brewer is appealing the decision and says she'll take it all the way to the Supreme Court.

Brewer has been a sharp critic of the National Guard deployment, saying the troops aren't enough and that Obama should have sent 6,000 along the border, half of them to Arizona.

But in March 2009, Brewer wrote Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking for 250 National Guard troops, less than half the amount now being sent.

Brewer spokesman Paul Senseman did not immediately return a call for comment Friday afternoon.

Santa Cruz County Sheriff Tony Estrada, whose territory is along the Mexico border and includes Nogales, said any additional manpower on the border is welcome and will help.

"It's definitely a start," he said. "Any more boots on the ground, they'll make things safer and it'll make the border more secure, especially for the Border Patrol-they have a humongous task out there, not only with illegal immigration but drugs."

But he said there'd have to be "thousands and thousands" of troops on the border to come close to having any major impact on illegal immigration.

"The border will never be sealed," he said. "They'll find ways to go under it (through tunnels), go through ports of entry with false documents or false claims; they find ways of going over, and they find ways to go around it."

Former President George W. Bush sent 6,000 National Guard troops to the border in June 2006, and they also had no arrest power. Those troops were pulled out in July 2008.

Comment:

Former President George W. Bush sent 6,000 National Guard troops to the border in June 2006, and they also had no arrest power. Those troops were pulled out in July 2008.

And a bloody lot of good it did. The problem is worse now than it's ever been. This is indeed a start, but that's all. We need at least five times that amount if we hope to properly seal the borders. And we have more than enough troops available. All we need do is stop those ridiculous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring our troops home and deploy them along the border. The problem is that that makes too much sense. You know the government. If it makes sense, they'll never do it. They always seem to have some technical piece of bureaucratic red tape as to why they can't.

You know, I'm really surprised that some left wing groups aren't crying racism over this action. Maybe they have, and I've just not heard about it yet. Well, I'll let you know if I do.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Gov. Brewer Condemns Report To UN Mentioning Ariz. Law

Associated Press
8/27/10

PHOENIX - Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer demanded Friday that a reference to the state's controversial immigration law be removed from a State Department report to the United Nations' human rights commissioner.

The U.S. included its legal challenge to the law on a list of ways the federal government is protecting human rights.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is "downright offensive" that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years.

"The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to 'review' by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional," Brewer wrote.

Arizona's law generally requires police officer enforcing other laws to investigate the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants.

Critics say it would lead officers to target Hispanics. Supporters, including Brewer, say the law prohibits racial profiling and other human rights abuses.

The U.S. Justice Department sued to block the measure, arguing federal law trumps the state's authority to enforce immigration laws.

A federal judge in July sided with the Justice Department and blocked enforcement of the law's most controversial provisions a day before it was scheduled to take effect.

In its report, the State Department does not specifically allege that Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling.

"A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world," the report says. "The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."

A State Department spokesman had no immediate comment on Brewer's letter.

Brewer, a Republican, is running for election in November. Her popularity in Arizona and her national profile have soared since she signed the immigration measure in April.

Comment:

If I were an Arizonan, she'd have my vote! Yeah, yeah Rocky, I know how you feel about voting for either Democrats or Republicans. But I always say that if you don't vote, you have no right to complain about things. Despite all our activism, we do do a lot of complaining about things!

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

California Fears Controversial Texas Curriculum is Contagious

by Alison Leithner June 02, 2010 06:21 AM (PT) Topics: Curricula & Methods, Education Reform, School Boards

Despite reassurances from publishers that market demand, not Texas, controls what gets printed, many states, including California, are still concerned that elements of the Texas curriculum will end up in their textbooks. On May 28th, the California Senate voted in favor of Senate Bill 1451, which requires the California Board of Education to monitor for Texas's adaptations in their textbooks.

The board will review all history and social studies texts that will be used in California classrooms and report any information that conforms to the new Texas standards but not the existing California ones. A special focus will be given to the inclusion and accurate portrayal of minorities in U.S. history.

California's bill passed in a bipartisan vote of 25-5, indicating that Republicans in California, just as in many other states, disapprove of the religious and majority-focused changes made in the Texas curriculum. Now, the bill must go to the Assembly and then on to Governor Schwarzenegger's desk before it can go into effect for the 2010-2011 school year.

Since the controversial social studies curriculum was adopted in Texas two weeks ago, textbook publishers have tried to quell concerns that books in all fifty states will reflect the changes. Publishers and market research companies agree that because of technological advances in recent years, it is far easier (and cheaper) to make different textbooks for different markets.

What this means is that publishers are already planning to create multiple editions of history and social studies textbooks. School districts will have the option of following the new Texas curriculum or of steering clear of it. This is a wise move considering the violent response from many state school boards and districts when word came down that the Texas Board of Education had approved the new curriculum. If a publisher only prints textbooks that conform to these changes, they stand to lose a lot of money from the bluer states and school districts.

www.change.org

Comment:

The California State government seems quite concerned over the possibility that their children might be taught conservative values. That would be terrible, wouldn't it?

Now let's recap California's liberal accomplishments. They bankrupted the state. They want to legalise marijuana. They want to legalise queer marriage. They have more companies that produce pornographic trash than any other state. They have made illegal aliens more welcome than any other state. They have one of the worst school systems in the country due to falling standardized test scores. And all thanks to liberalism.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Texas School Board Passes Controversial Social Studies Curriculum

by Alison Leithner May 24, 2010 03:31 AM (PT) Topics: Curricula & Methods, Education Reform, Religion & Education, School Boards

In a 9-5 vote, the Texas School Board passed controversial changes to the state's social studies curriculum on May 21. The new curriculum, to take effect in August of 2011, has been under the microscope for the past few months due to its strong lean towards ultra-conservative ideas.

Some of the adjustments to the curriculum include focusing on the impact of conservative groups and not discussing the influence of associations labeled as liberal or minority. There will be no requirement to talk about the career of the late Senator Ted Kennedy, though more focus will be given to former president Reagan's legacy. In addition, a positive light will be shone on Senator Joe McCarthy, the power behind the 1950s hunt for Communists on U.S. soil that resulted in the ruined lives of countless Americans.

One of the arguments in support of the changes is that current textbooks are too left centric and liberal in the topics they cover. People argue that history is supposed to equally represent all sides. Few would contest this statement. However, the cries of outrage from Americans across the country at many of the now accepted changes suggest that the new curriculum still gives a biased account of historical events. The indignation doesn't just come from liberals either. Former Education Secretary Rod Paige, a conservative who served under former president George W. Bush, denounced the new curriculum as being a vehicle for political views and not an accurate representation of history.

Don McLeod, the now infamous dentist credited with leading the conservative members of the school board, recently wrote that "the left...focus on differences not unity," which is why the textbooks required adaptations. Considering the motto of the United States, E Pluribus Unum (Out of many, one), that seems like an appropriate approach to United States history. It took many different people of many different ethnic, religious and ideological backgrounds to establish the America we know today. These people should all be equally represented in our textbooks: the conservative, the liberal, the majority, the minority and everyone in between.

Texas's new curriculum is not a step towards remembering "what it means to be an American" as Mr. McLeod claims. It is a politically motivated piece of work that will end up hurting America's most important asset: her children.

www.change.org

Comment:

Great news from Texas! Someone finally is teaching the children that it's Okay to be conservative, instead of that libertard trash they're taught, especially here in California. Leave it to the Texans to stand up against the Jew run educational systems that have been brainwashing our children into the so-called modern lifestyles, including "alternate lifestyles".

My main concern is that somehow, the libertards will get this issue to the Supreme Court, and we all have a fairly good idea how they'll rule. Of course, they may uphold the new curriculum. Every now and again they surprise us and rule on the side of the conservatives.

Monday, August 23, 2010

The Burden Of Illegal Aliens On American Society

WASHINGTON - While the military "quagmire" in Iraq was said to tip the scales of power in the U.S. midterm elections, most Americans have no idea more of their fellow citizens - men, women and children - were murdered this year by illegal aliens than the combined death toll of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan since those military campaigns began.

Though no federal statistics are kept on murders or any other crimes committed by illegal aliens, a number of groups have produced estimates based on data collected from prisons, news reports and independent research.

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens. That's 21,900 since Sept. 11, 2001.

Total U.S. troop deaths in Iraq as of last week were reported at 2,863. Total U.S. troop deaths in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan during the five years of the Afghan campaign are currently at 289, according to the Department of Defense.

But the carnage wrought by illegal alien murderers represents only a fraction of the pool of blood spilled by American citizens as a result of an open border and un-enforced immigration laws.

While King reports 12 Americans are murdered daily by illegal aliens, he says 13 are killed by drunk illegal alien drivers - for another annual death toll of 4,745. That's 23,725 since Sept. 11, 2001.

While no one - in or out of government - tracks all U.S. accidents caused by illegal aliens, the statistical and anecdotal evidence suggests many of last year's 42,636 road deaths involved illegal aliens.

A report by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Study found 20 percent of fatal accidents involve at least one driver who lacks a valid license. In California, another study showed that those who have never held a valid license are about five times more likely to be involved in a fatal road accident than licensed drivers.

Statistically, that makes them an even greater danger on the road than drivers whose licenses have been suspended or revoked - and nearly as dangerous as drunk drivers.

King also reports eight American children are victims of sexual abuse by illegal aliens every day - a total of 2,920 annually.

Based on a one-year in-depth study, Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute of Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each. She analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.

As the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. increases, so does the number of American victims.

According to Edwin Rubenstien, president of ESR Research Economic Consultants, in Indianapolis in 1980, federal and state correctional facilities held fewer than 9,000 criminal aliens. But at the end of 2003, approximately 267,000 illegal aliens were incarcerated in all U.S. jails and prisons.

While the federal government doesn't track illegal alien murders, illegal alien rapes or illegal alien drunk driving deaths, it has studied illegal aliens incarcerated in U.S. prisons.

In April 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a report on a study of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003. It found the following:

The 55,322 illegal aliens studied represented a total of 459,614 arrests - some eight arrests per illegal alien.

Their arrests represented a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses - some 13 offenses per illegal alien. 36 percent had been arrested at least five times before.

Peter Wagner, author of a new report called "The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration." states "That is part of the dark side of illegal immigration and when we allow the 'good' in we get the 'bad' along with them. The question is, how much 'bad' is acceptable and at what price?"

Comment:

And the liberals have the gall to tells us that these parasites are vital to the American economy. Any idiot can see that we're better off without them!

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Israel To Attack Iran Nuclear Facility Before It Becomes Active & Immune

Neocon Says Israel Is Set To Attack Iran Over Nuclear Program

News that Russia will load nuclear fuel rods into an Iranian reactor has touched off a countdown to a point of no return, a deadline by which Israel would have to launch an attack on Iran's Bushehr reactor before it becomes effectively "immune" to any assault, says former Bush administration U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton.

Once the fuel rods are loaded, Bolton told Fox News on Friday afternoon, "it makes it essentially immune from attack by Israel. Because once the rods are in the reactor an attack on the reactor risks spreading radiation in the air, and perhaps into the water of the Persian Gulf."

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declared in March that Russia would start the Bushehr reactor this summer. But the announcement from a spokesman for Russia's state atomic agency to Reuters Friday sent international diplomats scrambling to head off a crisis.

The story immediately became front-page news in Israel, which has laid precise plans to carry out an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities while going along with President Obama's plans to use international sanctions and diplomatic persuasion to convince Iran's clerics not to go nuclear.Bolton made it clear that it is widely assumed that any Israeli attack on the Bushehr reactor must take place before the reactor is loaded with fuel rods.

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/John...8/13/id/367449

Comment:

"The Eastern World, it is explodin'..."

Friday, August 20, 2010

ASSOCIATED PRESS COVERS FOR OBONGO, SAY MUSLIM ACCUSATIONS UNFOUNDED, INCORRECT

Associated Press, Aug. 19 2010

NEW YORK - "President Obama is a Muslim." "He's not an American citizen." "He wasn't even born here."

None of this is true. But to surprising levels, it is believed.

Blame it on the media, or on human nature. All presidents deal with image problems - that they're too weak or too belligerent, too far left or far right. But Obama also faces questions over documented facts, in part because some people identify more with the rumormongers than the debunkers.

"Trust and distrust - that explains almost all of it," says Nicholas DiFonzo, professor of psychology at the Rochester Institute of Technology and an expert on rumor and gossip research. "We are in such a highly polarized political environment. Our country is sorting itself into more closely knit, opposing factions each year" - factions, DiFonzo suggests, that in turn become "echo chambers" for factoids that aren't fact at all.

Nearly one in five people, or 18 percent, said they think Obama is Muslim, up from the 11 percent who said so in March 2009, according to a poll released Thursday. The proportion who correctly say he is a Christian is just 34 percent, down from 48 percent in March of last year.

The White House even felt compelled to respond with a terse knockdown from spokesman Bill Burton: "The president is obviously a Christian. He prays every day."

Obama is the Christian son of a Kenyan Muslim father and a Kansas mother. Born in Hawaii, he lived from ages 6 to 10 in predominantly Muslim Indonesia with his mother and Indonesian stepfather. His full name, Barack Hussein Obama, sounds Muslim to many.

Confusion about Obama's religion was common, and sometimes encouraged, during the 2008 campaign. An Associated Press photograph that circulated on the Internet, and was posted on The Drudge Report, showed Obama dressed in traditional local garments - a white turban and a wraparound white robe - during a visit to Kenya in 2006. Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton may have contributed through her response to a question, during a "60 Minutes" interview, about whether he was a Muslim. "There's nothing to base that on," she said. "As far as I know."

Others have helped keep rumors about Obama's religion and birth alive. Conservative commentators including radio talk show host Michael Savage have repeated debunked claims that Obama attended a radical Muslim madrassa in Indonesia. Rush Limbaugh has facetiously referred to "Imam Obama" in recent days, and last year praised a woman who at a Delaware town hall meeting questioned Obama's citizenship. Lou Dobbs gave significant air time to such "birther" claims on CNN - despite his own insistence that he believed Obama was born in the U.S.

The new survey, conducted by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center and its affiliated Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, is based on interviews conducted before the controversy over whether Muslims should be permitted to construct a mosque near the World Trade Center site. Obama has said he believes Muslims have the right to build an Islamic center there, though he's also said he won't take a position on whether they should actually build it.

We have never been without misperceptions, but they are speeded and multiplied in the Internet age. Last month, right-wing bloggers - citing unnamed sources within the Laredo Police Department in Texas - reported that the Mexican drug cartel Zetas had captured two Laredo ranches. The story was picked up by author-pundit Michelle Malkin and other conservatives.

Inquiries from local media and the liberal Web site Talking Points Memo turned up different news: The raids never happened.

"The Internet has made it worse," says Lori Robertson, managing editor of the website FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan project run under the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. "Any of these rumors are more rampant, and there's more stuff about them - blogs writing about conspiracy theories. People are exposed to it more."

Robertson says her organization has been asked hundreds of times about Obama's religion, even after FactCheck published an explanatory article in early 2008 called "Sliming Obama." It focused on the chain e-mail that many believe helped spread the lie.

Despite what the e-mail claimed, FactCheck.org has noted that Obama was sworn into office as a U.S. senator using the Bible instead of the Quran; a photograph was posted to prove it. FactCheck also posted videos of Obama reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in the Senate, in an attempt to counter claims that he refused.

Still, the questions about Obama's faith didn't stop.

"Did Obama order creation of a postage stamp to honor a Muslim holiday?" FactCheck.org's answer: "The first class stamp honoring Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha was first issued eight years ago. Obama has followed Bush's practice of reaching out to Muslims on Ramadan."

Superstitions and myths are timeless and universal, and so are the people who exploit them, whether Holocaust deniers, race supremacists or conspiracy theorists.

Misinformation in the mass media age was captured by the author-columnist Walter Lippman in his classic "Public Opinion," published in 1922. Finding that world events were driven by a tiny minority manipulating the rest, Lippman noted "the comparatively meager time available in each day for paying attention to public affairs, the distortion arising because events have to be compressed into very short messages, the difficulty of making a small vocabulary express a complicated world."

The problem wasn't only with the media, but with the public.

"People, he wrote, "live in the same world, but think and feel in different ones." Lippman believed many "suffer from anemia, from lack of appetite and curiosity for the human scene."

And so millions have thought that the country was overrun with communists, that John F. Kennedy was taking orders from the pope, that AIDS spreads through casual contact, that Saddam Hussein or even the George W. Bush administration helped plan the Sept. 11 attacks. In the 1990s, when the government was running a surplus under the Clinton administration, a poll showed substantial numbers of people thought it was running a deficit.

DiFonzo was stunned when he heard one of those rumors stated as fact in his upper-level social psychology class last year. A student raised her hand and insisted, "But George Bush was behind the bombings of Sept. 11."

"She was serious," DiFonzo said, adding that he believes she accepted the rumor because other people in her life gave her the impression that it was plausible.

"This isn't a partisan thing," he said. "It's not a characteristic of Democrats or of Republicans. It's a human characteristic. It's a place that we happen to be at in our culture today. What seems outlandish is often based on what we think may be plausible."

Comment:

I have to admit, that this is a brilliant piece of propaganda for Obongo. A top-notch bit of spin-control, if I do say so myself. Let's examine how this went.

Firstly, they did it 'scientific' style. They broke it down, and addressed things point by point. The public loves scientific stuff. It sounds more credible.

Secondly, that bit with Shrillary was a great touch. She only tried to cast doubt on Obongo to benefit her own presidential campaign, and for no other reason. Her little dig was professional, not personal. If she weren't also vying for the Democratic nomination herself, she most likely would have endorsed Obongo publicly.

Also, they used the old, 'accuse the accusers' trick. When you're being attacked, tear down your accusers, show the people their flaws, thereby destroying their credibility. When you're in office, casting doubt on your attackers is almost as good as totally debunking them. After all, in America you're innocent until proven guilty.

Another smart move is to blame technology. They can't yet totally control the internet, so simply say that these are nothing but rumours spread by the computer age.

I could find only one or two major flaws in this wonderful piece of propaganda. They glossed right over it. That's Obongo's true citizenship. As I've said so many times, if he would show us his real birth certificate, not only would it put that issue to rest once and for all, but he could rub our noses in it (I'd get a lot of satisfaction from that if I were him), yet he still refuses. The only possible conclusion is he is not an American citizen. Also, it was mentioned that the Mexican attacks on Laredo were nothing but rumours spread by right-wingers, without a shred of proof. Yet they do not not offer a shred of proof that they did NOT occur either. They should have said that these "so-called attacks were nothing more than a couple of gang-related shootings. Such shootings occur in major American cities nearly every week." That would be believable, since people are well aware that stories - even true ones can get more exaggerated with each person who tells it. For example, once when I was teaching middle school, our pencil sharpener broke. I sharpened my students pencils with a one inch pen knife. After school, I was called into the principal's office. She told me that it was reported that I was showing my classes my eight inch Bowie knife! When I showed her my little pen knife, we both had a big laugh.

Also, citing examples of paranoia from the Cold War Era was pretty nifty. Most people agree that Senator McCarthy was a paranoid nutjob these days, so using that, or similar things can be pretty persuasive.

All in all, it was a first-class job of pro-Obongo propaganda. I doubt that the author of this story is really a reporter. He, or she, had quite a lot of expertise in slicing baloney.

Here's a related joke: What's the difference between a Propaganda Minister and a Press Secretary? A Propaganda Minister slices the baloney, and the Press Secretary serves it!

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Obama's Watergate, But On An Epic Scale

Scathing Congress report slams Obama's 'covert, criminal activity'
President charged with illegally using taxpayer money to manipulate public

---------------------------------------
Posted: August 16, 2010
12:01 am Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a scathing staff report today charging that the White House has "used the machinery of the Obama campaign to tout the president's agenda through inappropriate and sometimes unlawful public relations and propaganda initiatives."

An advance pre-publication copy of the report, shared by Issa's Washington office with WND, accuses the White House of nothing short of criminal activity. It charges the Obama administration with violating federal laws to advance what the Government Accounting Office has characterized as an unlawful "covert campaign," using federal resources "to activate a sophisticated propaganda and lobbying campaign."

Pulling no punches, the Oversight Republican Report accuses the Obama White House of "violating federal law prohibiting the use of appropriated funds for publicity or propaganda purposes."

"The White house has failed to transition from campaign mode to leadership mode and is now inappropriately leveraging those campaign-trail relationships to unlawfully generate support for the president's agenda," the report concludes. Read in its entirety, the Oversight Republican Report charges the Obama administration with the type of callous, unethical and possibly criminal manipulation of public opinion that is reminiscent of Watergate and the illegal campaign activities engineered by Donald Segretti on behalf of the Committee to Re-Elect the President during Richard Nixon's presidential election campaign of 1972.

In 1974, Donald Segretti pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of distributing illegal campaign materials, for which he served in federal prison four months of a six-month term.

The Obama administration's abuses alleged in the Oversight Republican Report can be summed up under the term "astro-turfing," a fraudulent public relations activity in which "the White House and the agency whose resources it is co-opting attempt to create the impression that grassroots support for a particular policy exists when in fact it has been fabricated using taxpayer dollars."

The report points to several instances of alleged, unlawful abuses:

The National Endowment for the Arts

On Aug. 6, 2009, on behalf of the White House Office of Public Engagement, NEA Director Yosi Sergent invited a group of artists, producers, promoters, organizers, marketers and other influencers of the arts to participate in a conference call designed to encourage involvement in President Obama's United We Serve program.

Nell Abernathy, director of outreach for United We Serve and Buffy Wicks, deputy director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, identified the goal of the NEA program was to recruit artists to create art to support the president's agenda "with the same enthusiasm and with the same energy that we all saw in each other during the campaign."

The Oversight Republican Report, however, contends the initiative was illegal.

"The use of taxpayer dollars and federal employees to create an alliance whereby the NEA becomes the de facto strategic communications arm of the White House is unlawful," the report alleges. "Using a government e-mail account and government personnel and resources to host a call using artists and arts group to support the president's agenda is a clear violation of federal law."

The report stresses that it was inappropriate for representatives of the White House and the NEA to formally ask artists and entertainers to use their talents to support the president's agenda "because many of these people rely on NEA grants to subsidize their livelihoods."

The Department of Justice

In October 2008, the Justice Department's Office of Public Affairs added Tracy Russo, the chief blogger and deputy director for online communications for Sen. John Edwards' presidential campaign, to direct the Department's "new media efforts."

The Oversight Republican Report documents that Russo covertly attempted to shape public opinion by posting comments on the Internet anonymously, or through the use of a pseudonym, attacking authors or contents viewed as critical of the president, in an effort to shape debate online.

The report concludes, "The deployment of Justice Department resources to generate clandestine comments on message boards and blogs is a highly improper use of the Department's resources."

The report cites GAO rulings stating that covert propaganda violates Title 5 U.S.C. Section 3107 of federal law, which prohibits the use of publicity experts unless specifically appropriated for that purpose.

Office of Education

The Oversight Republican Report details that beginning on the morning of April 24, 2009, U.S. Department of Education Deputy Assistant Secretary for External Affairs and Outreach Massie Ritsch launched an e-mail campaign in coordination with the White House to promote President Obama's plan to begin a federal takeover of student loans.

The report again charges criminal abuses: "The intent of the e-mail is clearly to create grassroots support for the president's education agenda by inappropriately leveraging Ritsch's position as a Department of Education employee. Because it was drafted or intended to influence members of Congress while they consider the president's federal student loan plan, it is unlawful."

Federal workforce

The Oversight Republican Report charges that in March 2010, White House Office for Health Reform Director Nancy-Ann DeParle sent "overtly partisan, unsolicited health-reform e-mails to career civil servants in executive branch offices, suggesting to recipients that they were being officially instructed by the White House to support the president's health-care reform proposals."

Again, the report charges the Obama White House with illegal activity: "Criminal statutes prohibit executive branch officials from using appropriated funds to influence the legislative process. Title 18 of the United States Code, section 1913, prohibits federal employees from engaging in the very activities DeParle urges."

Department of Health and Human Resources

The Oversight Republican Report charges that the Department of Health and Human Resources contracted with Jonathan Gruber, a health-care economist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to provide "technical assistance" to support President Obama's health care reform proposals.

For this, Gruber was paid $297,600, plus another $95,000 for a second HHS job.

The Obama administration then relied upon and distributed Gruber's commentary and views to publications including Time, The Washington Post, the New York Times and the New Republic without revealing that Gruber was a paid HHS consultant.

"Using HHS appropriations to contract a highly visible health-care expert to advocate on behalf of administration policies under the guise of providing 'technical assistance' is inappropriate," the Oversight Republican Report concludes, while further alleging that the administration's failure to disclose Gruber's status while touting his work violates GAO's policy prohibiting covert propaganda.

Other abuses

Among the additional abuses, the Oversight Republican Report cites a cable television ad featuring 84-year-old Andy Griffith promoting Medicare and the Obama administration's health-care reform bill.

The Department of Health and Human Services paid $700,000 to make the cable television ad buy, and the report alleges the commercial - run in July 2010 - gave the appearance that it was "designed to affect general elections by convincing seniors to support one of the Democrat's major legislative initiatives."

The report further charges the White House of posting "fictitious and misleading" information about jobs "saved and created" on the White House-maintained website Recovery.gov.

Also criticized are signs the Federal Highway Administration has encouraged the states to post, announcing that new federal highway projects were being funded by stimulus dollars.

David Axelrod

Axelrod and astro-turfing

The practice of using covert propaganda to push political opinion is familiar to at least one administration official, Obama Senior Advisor David Axelrod.

Prior to joining then-Sen. Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, Axelrod was a partner in AKP&D Message & Media, a Chicago-based media and public relations firm that listed among its corporate clients Cablevision and AT&T.

According to a Business Week report published in 2008, AKP&D set up front organizations for corporations that wanted to run public issue ads without having the ads identified as having been paid for by the corporations.

Business Week cited as an example a television commercial Axelrod's firm created for Commonwealth Edison, the largest electric utility in Illinois. The ad warned a ComEd bankruptcy and blackouts could occur unless a rate hike was approved. The ad was sponsored by CORE, which described itself as "a coalition of individuals, businesses and organizations."

Comment:

Now I'm no fan of Bill Clinton, but all he did was the nasty with Monica in the Oval Office and the shit really hit the fan! Obongo is violating the law left, right, and centre and no one seems to give a damn! AMERICA AWAKE - Before it's too late!

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Mandatory National Service Measure Orders US Citizens To Perform Duties Under Obama

Democrats: Let's have mandatory national service

By Chelsea Schilling

A bill introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., would reinstate a compulsory military draft during wartime and require U.S. citizens not selected for military duty to perform a "national-service obligation" - as defined by President Obama - for a minimum of two years.

Rangel introduced the Universal National Service Act, or H.R. 5741, on July 15. The measure was referred to the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel on July 23.

Rangel introduced similar bills in 2003, 2006 and 2007. His current bill does not have a co-sponsor.

Rangel took to the floor of the House to reintroduce H.R. 5741, stating, "I have introduced legislation to reinstate the draft and to make it permanent during time of war. It is H.R. 5741, and what this does is to make everyone between the ages of 18 and 42 - whether they're men or women, whether they're straight or gay - to have the opportunity to defend this great country whenever the president truly believes that our national security is threatened." That nigger is trying to get average Americans to fight and die for the sake of IsraHell & it's endless wars. It's not enough that our soldiers have to die for that evil hell hole in the middle east, but now our civilians must shed blood for the Talmud as well. Hey Obongo boy, you can stick this plan up your dirty nigger ass.

According to an announcement released by Rangel's office:

The bill provides for a national-service obligation - either military or civilian - for every citizen and permanent resident, male and female, of the U.S., aged 18 to 42.

Persons may be inducted to perform military service only if declaration of war is in effect, or if the president declares a national emergency necessitating the induction of persons to perform military service and immediately informs Congress of the reasons for the declaration.

Defines "national service" as either military or civilian service as defined by the president that promotes national or homeland security.

Gives the president the authority to establish the numbers of persons to be selected for military service and the means of selection.

Requires those not selected for military service to perform their national-service obligation in a civilian capacity for a period of two years.

Directs the president to prescribe the regulations necessary to carry out the act.

Deferments for education are only permitted through completion of high school, to a maximum age of 20.

Deferments may be made for physical or mental disability, or under claims of conscientious objector.

"What troubles me most about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is the total indifference to the suffering and loss of life among our brave young soldiers on the battlefield," Rep. Rangel said. "The reason is that so few families have a stake in the war which is being fought by other people's children.

"The test for Congress, particularly for those members who support the war, is to require all who enjoy the benefits of our democracy to contribute to the defense of the country. All of America's children should share the risk of being placed in harm's way."

Prison Planet writer Rob Dew referenced the following video posted on YouTube and noted, "This echoes the sentiment of President Obama who asked Congress in February 2009 to send him a bipartisan bill in the spirit of national service."

Likewise, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel advocated for similar universal civilian service in a 2006 book, "The Plan: Big Ideas for America."

Comment:

If this measure passes, it will give Obama virtually unlimited power to continue the futile wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that he inherited from Emperor Bush. A war he promised to bring to an end. Not only has he not ended them, but he has indeed escalated them. Rather than bring our troops home and deploy them on the southern border to stave off a real invasion force, he continues to waste American lives and tax dollars to fight Israel's Muslim enemies, and to continue to help the Jew Capitalists make more and more money off of these atrocities.

What does he hope to accomplish? Does he feel he can actually change these Islamic terrorists? Impossible. Those people are still living in the 12th Century, sociologically speaking. They believe they are fighting a Jihad in the name of Allah. They believe that if they give up, they are betraying Allah. They will never give up. They will never stop. People need to be allowed to solve their own differences, or there can be no peace.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

INVASION ALERT!!!!!! - Border Patrol has Retreated, Parts of Border ‘Too Dangerous’


(CNSNews.com) - Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County, Ariz., one of four Arizona counties contiguous with the U.S-Mexico border, said Friday that the U.S. Border Patrol has pulled back from parts of the border in his and neighboring counties because manning those areas has become too dangerous.

Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County, Ariz. (Cochise County Sheriff's office photo)

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/71105

“And you frankly have Border Patrolmen--and I know this from talking to Border Patrol agents-who will not allow their agents to work on the border because it is too dangerous,” Dever told CNSNews.com in a videotaped interview. “Now what kind of message is that for crying out loud?”

WATCH THIS VIDEO:

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=hd8zIrDkDk

Dever, a native of Cochise County, has been in local law enforcement in the county for three decades. He was elected the county sheriff in 1996.

Dever stressed that the Border Patrolmen are ready and willing to perform their mission of securing the border, but that Border Patrol managers had determined that in “some places” the danger was too great and they wanted to avoid the risk of an international incident such as a cross-border firefight.

“Now, I am telling you, the agents, you give them a mission, you tell them what you want them to do, they will go do it,” said Dever. “I mean, these guys for the most part are warriors, they are soldiers.

“Then you have middle management and upper management that says: No, it’s too dangerous right there and we’re going to cause an international incident if there’s shooting across the line, back and forth,” said Dever.

“Well, I say: Come, bring it on. Let’s cause the international incident,” he said.

Dever said there were places where the Border Patrol had pulled back from the border in his county and in neighboring areas both in Arizona and New Mexico.

He pointed out that in Pinal County, 70 miles north of the border, the Bureau of Land Management has put up a sign along a drug smuggling corridor to warn American citizens away from the region because it is too dangerous.

CNSNews.com provided Customs and Border Protection with a transcript of Sheriff Dever's statement about the Border Patrol pulling back from parts of the border in his area because it is too dangerous.

"There are areas down there in the Tucson Sector where for officer safety reasons, officers aren’t up on the line. For whatever reason--it may be a remote area," said a CBP spokesperson. "We still have the means to detect entry, whether it is a sensor or a scoped vehicle. So the entry is detected, but the apprehension of the undocumented migrant isn’t affected until they reach a safe area.”

Comment:

Well, it seems that there are two real lawmen in Arizon, Sheriff Arpiao, and Sheriff Dever. Dever is so right when he said that the Federal Government is afraid of an international incident. Perhaps that's exactly what we need to wake people up, and get troops on our borders. If the federal government won't do it, then Governor Brewer could deploy the Arizona National Guard. After all, she is the commander-in-chief of the state militia. I think she's got the guts to do it. She's probably saving that as a last resort. She wants to try everything she can think of to get the feds to do their jobs. I only hope she doesn't wait until a real tragedy occurs before she acts.

Monday, August 16, 2010

I'm Still Here

There may be some of you who are wondering how I'm faring since the press outed me eleven days ago. Well, I'm still here. Now, they may have ruined my chances of winning the election, but maybe not.

First of all, there may be many 'silent' racialists in my town who support me, but wouldn't dare come out and say it publicly. Secondly, as I've said previously, the public has a short attention span. By November, most probably won't remember me, or they might remember vaguely, but won't remember which one of the total of six candidates are me. Yes, that's right. There are now six. It seems that on the very last day of filing, four others registered as candidates. Coincidence? Maybe. Some people do put things off until the last minute. It is possible that some of the four registered as candidates so that I wouldn't be running unopposed. Well, they have that right. But if I do lose this election, and any of the last minute candidates wins, I'll be watching them very closely. If any of them, for any reason, resigns his or her seat before the end of the first year, I'll be filing a lawsuit against them.

You may be asking yourselves why? I'll tell you. If they get elected and if they resign shortly thereafter, it means that they ran, not because they wanted the office, but they wanted specifically to keep me from getting it. The plan would have been to run for office, win, get me out of the way, then resign, and let the chairman of the board, or the mayor (I'm not certain which has the authority) appoint an interim board member to fill out the term of the one who resigned. If this does happen, it's a pretty sneaky way of getting rid of me, and I'll let the courts decide if it's actionable, so they had better watch themselves. Anyone who knows me will tell you I'm a suer. Five lawsuits, four wins. I would have won the last one, but I didn't have the written proof I needed. Anyway, what I'm doing now is deciding what money I can spend on campaigning, and what approach I should use. I'll have that figured out by the end of the month.

As to my personal and work life, all is basically normal. No problems at work, and no problems at home. I've even picked up three new clients.

So, all is basically well. I'm not under much stress, and my stomach problems have stopped. I am now sure that although this may have cost me the election, my life hasn't been destroyed.

I want to urge all my fellow WN's out there to not be afraid to run for office because of this. If you are well known in the movement, you will be outed. The press, while they cannot be trusted are very good at what they do, and most papers and TV/radio stations employ professional researchers. They will find you out.

But if you are unknown in the movement, don't worry. Run for office. Don't talk to the press, and keep your WN status a secret. In the Aryan Nations, our membership lists are strictly confidential. Director Mullet would destroy them before handing them over to the government. After you've been in office a while, and have been doing a good job, then you can reveal yourself if you like. Just don't be in a hurry to out yourself. Wait for the right moment. That moment is sometime AFTER you've won, not before. Good luck to anyone with enough guts to try.

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Media turns off the picture of MASS MURDER in Connecticut

Black Murders Eight Whites: Media Blames Whites

The title of this column seems unbelievable, but it is in fact what happened in America this past week. And almost no one has noticed.

After 50 years of being inundated with stories of white racism, and being taught in college that in this white-dominated society, only a white can be a racist, the American public has been properly brainwashed into accepting the otherwise incredible: A black man murdered eight white people at his place of work because they were white, and the media story is about the murderer’s alleged experiences of racism.

Here’s the Associated Press Report from Aug. 7, four days after the murders. It was reprinted in The Washington Post and throughout America:

“To those closest to him, Omar Thornton was caring, quiet and soft-spoken … But underneath, Thornton seethed with a sense of racial injustice for years that culminated in a shooting rampage Tuesday in which the Connecticut man killed eight and wounded two others at his job at Hartford Distributors in Manchester before killing himself.

“‘I know what pushed him over the edge was all the racial stuff that was happening at work,’ said his girlfriend, Kristi Hannah.

“‘He always felt like he was being discriminated (against) because he was black,’ said Jessica Anne Brocuglio, his former girlfriend. ‘Basically they wouldn’t give him pay raises. He never felt like they accepted him as a hard working person.’

“‘Thornton changed jobs a few times because he was not getting raises, Brocuglio said.”

The New York Times Aug. 3 headline read: “Troubles Preceded Connecticut Workplace Killing,” and in the second paragraph, the Times reported:

“He might also have had cause to be angry: he had complained to his girlfriend of being racially harassed at work, the woman’s mother said, and lamented that his grievances had gone unaddressed.”

On Aug. 7, 2010, The Washington Post headline read, “Beer warehouse shooter long complained of racism.”

Of course, Thornton was fired for stealing beer, and there was video proof of him doing so. But this fact - the one indisputable and most pertinent pre-murder fact - got lost within the larger context of Thornton’s claims of being a victim of whites.

Those preoccupied with Thornton’s charges of workplace racism might wish to reflect on this: Racist and other bigotry-based murderers always blame their victims. Medieval Christians who murdered Jews blamed the Jews for poisoning wells, baking Christian children’s blood in their matzo or some other terrible crime. Whites who lynched blacks blamed those blacks for rape or some other crime. Nothing is new about the Thornton racist murders except that the society in which in it occurred concentrated on the racist’s excuses rather than on his murders.

Just as leading liberals would not ascribe Islamist motives - until there was no possibility of denying them - to recent Muslim attacks on Americans, the liberal media, i.e., almost all news media in America, does not brand these Connecticut murders for what they are: racist. That is why Thornton told the 9-1-1 operator, “I wish I could have gotten more of the people (i.e., whites).”

We are repeatedly told by liberal whites and blacks that America needs an honest dialogue on race. Needless to say, they don’t mean it because the moment a white or black says anything critical of black behavior, he is labeled racist or Uncle Tom. So most non-liberal whites and blacks just keep quiet.

One result is this morally upside-down reporting of the murders in Connecticut.

Another example is the liberal narrative on blacks in prison - “there are more black men in prison than in college.” Every decent American regards this fact as a major tragedy. But most Americans believe that the fault lies primarily with the black criminals, not with a racist society. Most Americans believe that blacks who mug, rape, rob or murder commit those crimes for the same reason whites do - they lack a sufficiently strong moral conscience.

But the dominant liberal narrative is that while white criminals are criminals, black criminals are largely victims.

Another example was the liberal narrative of the 1992 “Rodney King” riots in Los Angeles. It was perfectly expressed by the major newspaper of that city, the Los Angeles Times. During the riots, in which innocent Koreans, whites and others were beaten, maimed and killed, and innocent businesses burned to the ground, the daily special section on the riots in the Los Angeles Times was titled “Understanding the Rage.” When blacks riot, whites are the reason. When a black murders eight whites in Connecticut, whites are the reason.

One terrible consequence of this liberal attitude toward black violent crime is that too many blacks come to believe that less is expected of them morally than from whites. And the truth is that most Americans on the left do expect less from blacks.

But saying any of this gets us nowhere because it is simply labeled racism. If you don’t believe me, check leftist reactions to this column on the Internet.

Most liberal leaders want an honest dialogue about race as much as they want to honestly describe the murders in Connecticut.

Comment:

I know this is starting to sound like rhetoric, but it's true. If those crimes were White on Black, we'd never hear the end of it. It would be in every newspaper, and every TV station. That's why it's up to us to help spread the word. Copy this story and spread it around. Tell everyone you know about it. Tell the liberals as well. It might be helpful to us to see their reactions, and you might get some of them to start thinking - maybe. Most liberals tend not to think. They jump on the bandwagon of every new idea, as long as it's been deemed politically correct. But we can still try.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Verizon Sucks!

Below is an announcement from Director Mullet. Another Jew owned company is at it again!

OFFICE NUMBER CHANGE DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Okay this is it! We once again got screwed with our office number. So now we are going back to 208-683-0880. The bill came in for this month and it was $1200.00 if you have Verizon then GET OFF OF IT! I can not take this, every time we get ahead then crap like this happens. So now the office phone is 208-683-0880 and is $80.25 per month it is a prepaid unlimited and this is better than getting screwed by Verizon, so now I pray that there is NO MORE BS FROM THIS JEW COMPANY THAT WANTS MONEY FROM THE AN!

Friday, August 13, 2010

R.I.P. United States Of America

Born 1776, Died 2008
It doesn't hurt to read this several times !!

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the Obama Presidential election:

Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty per cent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

Comment:

"The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire."

He who does not remember the past, is condemned to relive it. - Santyana.

History is repeating itself. - Dan Schruender.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

WHITE children being DEPORTED - despite being BORN on US soil!

Over a turbulent week, at least some and maybe all have discovered that mum and dad are not who they said they were. The children's citizenship, family history, and even their very names have been called into question.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/bre...-1225887380709

At least two children involved in the case, ages 1 and 3, will soon be headed for Russia. Of the 11 people charged this week with being members of a Russian spy ring, eight were parents.

Collectively, they are believed to have eight children, although, like much else associated with this strange post-Cold War spying case, the true facts are hazy.

Some of the older children are likely already wrestling with questions about their identities.

Juan Lazaro Jr, a gifted 17-year-old pianist at New York's LaGuardia High School of the performing arts, was named after his father. But the FBI said this week that dad's name was fake, as was his claim to have been raised in South America.

Tim Foley, a 20-year-old student at George Washington University, has said he was born in Toronto and grew up in Paris and Boston. Now his true birth country has been called into question. Prosecutors say they have evidence the family is actually Russian.

Two girls growing up in suburban Montclair, New Jersey, ages 7 and 11, were given the last name Murphy, but prosecutors said that was a lie, too.

"While the FBI has spent years conducting extensive electronic and physical surveillance of the people who call themselves the Murphys, there is no indication that the Murphy's children have any inkling that their parents are, in truth and in fact, Russian secret agents," Assistant US Attorney Michael Farbiarz wrote in a court filing.

The future of those children, at least the youngest ones, is now in question. Who will take care of them if their parents remain in prison? Do they have extended families in Russia they have never met? Are they all American citizens?

US immigration officials have declined to comment on the children's' status, citing privacy rules, but note that any person born in the United States is a citizen by right, except in certain cases involving the children of diplomats or other foreign government workers.

At least two of the children, the toddler and pre-schooler whose parents posed as American Michael Zottoli and Canadian Patricia Mills, will be going to Russia. Federal prosecutors said the couple acknowledged they are Russian citizens and instructed a family friend now caring for the children to contact relatives in Russia to arrange for the youngsters to go there.

By most accounts, the couples charged in the case appeared to be caring parents. Several raised children who excelled.

Tim Foley reportedly speaks English, French and German and said he was learning Chinese. He said he was majoring in International Affairs with a concentration in Asian studies, and has written about his plan to spend a semester in Beijing.

His 16-year-old brother, Alex, attended the International School of Boston, a private high school where some classes are taught in French and the theme is "shaping global citizens".

The two sons were in court Thursday to watch a hearing in their parents' case. The couple smiled at the boys and Alex waved in return.

Juan Lazaro Jr could be reunited soon with his mother, Vicky Pelaez, also a defendant in the case and one of the few suspects to use a real name. She could be released on bail.

His father has allegedly acknowledged his name was fabricated and that he had been working for the Russian intelligence service.

Authorities have not revealed the whereabouts of 11-year-old Katie and 7-year-old Lisa Murphy, who were last seen by neighbours being led from their home on the day of their parents' arrest, carrying backpacks and pillows.

The citizenship of the children of the couple known as Zottoli and Mills is unclear, although they, too, were born after their parents had settled in the US.

Former neighbours in Seattle, where the family lived before moving to Virginia last year, remembered the couple as doting on their now 3-year-old son, Kenny, and recounted how they gave him the master bedroom so he would have space to run around.

The tot may now find himself learning a new language in a new country, but possibly without his parents, who could get up to 25 years in jail if convicted.

"At least two children involved in the case, ages 1 and 3, will soon be headed for Russia. Of the 11 people charged this week with being members of a Russian spy ring, eight were parents.

US immigration officials have declined to comment on the children's' status, citing privacy rules, but note that any person born in the United States is a citizen by right, except in certain cases [like when they're WHITE?

The citizenship of the children of the couple known as Zottoli and Mills is unclear, although they, too, were born after their parents had settled in the US."

Comment:

White children they deport, Mexicans get to stay. How is this fair? At least the children of illegal Mexicans are familiar with the Mexican culture, and most speak Spanish. The older of these kids will have to learn a new language, and they know little or nothing about Russia. They are being forced to go to a completely alien environment, yet they were born in this country. Something just isn't right about this.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America

Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament"- 10/25/07.

I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What Happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?" Hummm, I thought, what would happen, so I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below.

It's a good question it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America ? The answers I found may surprise you!

In California , if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico , it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

In Colorado , 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grand-kids would move back 'home', mostly to Mexico . That would save Coloradans an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% drop-out/flunk-out rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado . Denver 's 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida , 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America , the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago , Illinois , 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home', the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our over-crowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A. , 20,000 members of the '18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!

America's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America 's economy which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt.

$8.7 trillion debt.

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California , Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.

Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.

Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego, California in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.

The New York Times reported them to be America 's new ' Third World ' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona ; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)

By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico . We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico . We already invite a million people into our country legally more than all other countries combined annually. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation. It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.

Interesting Statistics!

Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens.(that's Billion with a 'B') -http://tinyurl.com/zob77

2. $2.2 billion dollars are spent each year on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English! http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...01/ldt.01.html

5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...01/ldt.01.html

6. $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That's $1.2 Billion a year. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...01/ldt.01.html

7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...01/ldt.01.html

8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. - http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...01/ldt.01.html

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US . http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine, crack, Guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S.from the southern border. http://tinyurl.com/t9sht

12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period and nbsp; -http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute./.org/publications.php?b=deportation

13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends. http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States ! http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml

Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Smurfs: Aryan Puppets or Harmless Cartoon Toys?





This is an original essay by Lisa Chwastiak, created for a Grade 11 English class. All appropriate lawsuits can be directed toward her. ;)

WARNING: This essay is based on UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMOUR. At least, I can't find anything on the Web that connects Peyo to the Klu Klux Klan. Several people believe the Smurfs are Communists, but few have ever connected them to white supremacists.
Is this hate-ridden slander?
Or a winking joke at something dearly held from childhood? Email Lisa at lisa@sideroad.com with your opinions!

The cartoon the "Smurfs" has been around for years, but no one ever looked close enough to see some of the underlying messages. It has always tried to express strong moral values by depicting acts of kindness and good deeds for one another. These little creatures were cute and loveable. These factors make it hard to believe the shows writer and creator Peyo, A.K.A. Pierre Cullimore, who passed away in 1992 at the age of 64, was found to be a Nazi and affiliated with the Klu Klux Klan. Looking at different aspects of the cartoon itself, perhaps it isn't so unbelievable.

The Smurfs always set out to give children a moral message by the end of each show. Yet intricately looped throughout each seeming harmless plot was a deeper, darker message. For example: The bad guy (Gargamel) gives a Smurf a coin in the hopes he will keep it and become greedy. The plan works, upsetting in the peaceful Smurf village. In the end, though all is resolved when the Smurf in question shares his new-found wealth with his little blue friends. Is it just coincidence that the "bad guy" happens to have a Jewish name and resemble someone of Jewish descent? Why was it so awful for the Smurf to keep the coin he had found? He had every right because it was own. Yet as the structure of their society was, it was wrong for one to have more than another. Sounds familiar, like socialism perhaps? (Webmaster's Note: Nazi; A member of the National Socialist (Worker's) Party in Germany, led by Adolf Hitler.)

In retrospect, some visual aspects of the show and even story lines show the creator's connection with Ku Klux Klan. The Klan is an organization of white supremacists who believe white people are the master race. (Webmaster Note: Or some such nonsense. I'll I know for sure is that they wear white bed sheets, silly, pointy hats, and are ignorant in a dangerous way.) The village was headed by Papa Smurf, a red-hat-wearing leader amongst the white-pointed-hat-wearing group. Pointy-hatted Blue Devils?Similarly, the leader of the K.K.K.(known as the Grand Dragon) wears a pointy red hat. In one episode, the Smurfs had an evil spell cast upon them. When they were black in colour, they were suddenly bad. There were also many episodes where they danced around fires much like one of the K.K.K's traditional rituals. Dancing to the beat of a different drummer?

Further "Nazi" influences can be seen in both the names and appearances of some of the characters. The villain of the story, Gargamel, was a man who bore resemblance to a parody of a stereo-typical Jewish man with dark hair and prominent features.Gargamel gets it again. He lived in a big old house that was unkept. He himself seemed unclean. His name descends from a German Jewish heritage as does the name of his cat Azrael. In Jewish mythology Azrael is the angel who separates the soul from the body at death. Among the Smurfs themselves there is only one female, with strangely Aryan features most prominently displayed by her long blond hair. In Nazi ideology this is a Caucasian gentile, especially one of Nordic stock. Hitler carried the belief that the Aryans possessed the ideal "look" for a Nazi. Nazi playtoy?

Even though these observations can be considered nothing more than speculation, there is no denying the evidence found in the creator's home. In truth, many viewers might choose not to believe this simply for the fact that they refuse to admit that they were being fooled. The truth that underlines the shows supposed objective, completely contradicted it. The show set out to teach children good morals and values like sharing and loving your neighbor, when in fact many some of the underlying messages of the show tell the opposite. To the creator, the show must have been perfect: A show that presented views that society considered good and right and intermixed a way to subtly express his owns views and opinions. His ideas were executed with enough care as to not arouse suspicion, therefore enabling him to do so until the day he retired. It wasn't until the day he died was the truth ever known. Perhaps this final lesson is his most important, and most ironic: Never trust what's on the surface.

© 1997, Lisa Chwastiak

Comment:

Now I realise this was written by a 16 or 17 year old girl, and as a former English teacher, I probably would have given her an A, but kids are often very liberal, and their ideas can range from the ridiculous to the absurd. That is assuming she's not just yanking our chains!

Monday, August 9, 2010

Jeff Foxworthy on the Taliban

After the last few days, I felt I really needed a good laugh. I found one. Jeff is pretty smart!!!

Some interesting observations on the Taliban by that great American philosopher, Jeff Foxworthy.

"YOU MAY BE A TALIBAN IF....."

1. You refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor..

2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can't afford shoes.

3. You have more wives than teeth.

4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon "unclean.."

5. You think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide.

6. You can't think of anyone you haven't declared Jihad against.

7. You consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing.

8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs.

9. You have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four.

10. Your cousin is president of the United States.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Media Circus: Day Three

Well, it's now day three since the 'big' (LOL) story broke. Bulldozer told me it's reached as far as the Washington Post. Andy Warhol said that everyone will have their 15 minutes of fame. In my case it's more like infamy. At least Aryan Nations is getting a lot of publicity, and that's at least one good thing to come out of this media freak show they've created. I'm still quite stunned at the level of uproar this has caused. As an educated man with a clean arrest record, I wonder if they see me as more of a threat than the typical, jackbooted, uneducated, skinhead thug that most people picture when they think of National Socialists?

With that in mind, I'd like to say that in spite of how disappointed I am in Rocky Suhayda's "I told you so" response to all of this, he is right about one thing: Security. It's not only ZOG and the ANTIFA that monitors our websites, blogs, and forums, but the press as well. The Washington Post said they picked up this story from our forum, so my advice to all White Nationalists and National Socialists is to never say anything on the internet that you wouldn't want to see in the press - especially if your real name is attached. It's alright to make mistakes - as long as you learn from them. I've learned from mine. For example, I can see by my blog's counter that the number of hits I'm getting a day has gone from about 20, to over 100. I'm sure some of those are from real WN's and NS's who hadn't heard of me previously, and are now visiting this blog to see what I'm all about. But I'm also sure that the majority of these hits are from reporters trying to see if they can get any more news worthy stories out of me.

Now to you reporters, I'd like to say that I know that the majority of you are just trying to do your jobs. However, there are some of you who see us as a great threat, and feel it is your duty to this country to try and take us down. Either way, being the centre of negative attention is not a fun thing, and I'd rather not provide you with any more copy. So for the time being, I'm not going to post any more about this entire situation. Starting tomorrow, I'll post the typical things I usually post, which will be most definitely be about SOMEONE ELSE!

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Attacked In The Press

The Jew Media is really doing a hatchet job on me since they found out I'm running for school board and in Aryan Nations. I'm in six or more papers, including the LA Times.

I'm also going to be mentioned, or have been mentioned on at least three TV stations: ABC, NBC, and WB. They're all screaming shit like "White Supremacist Runs For School Board". They got a hold of a photo of me in front of a Swastika, and they're really going to town on me. Here's one of the stories.

White supremacist targets seat on Rialto school board

Josh Dulaney, Staff Writer

Posted: 08/05/2010 04:25:04 PM PDT

RIALTO - An avowed white supremacist who often drops racist fliers on residential lawns and driveways is seeking election to the school board.

Dan Schruender, a past president of the California chapter of an Aryan Nations group, filed nomination papers Monday with the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters.

Schruender is aiming for one of two seats up for election in the Rialto Unified School District, where trustees Joanne Gilbert and John Kazalunas are seeking re-election. "The Aryan Nations is not running me for the school board," Schruender said Thursday. "I did this all on my own. I was thinking of running for office for years."

Schruender on Tuesday announced his campaign on an Aryan Nations blog. The group is based in Chillicothe, Ohio. Kazalunas said Schruender's candidacy is a reminder that voters should scrutinize everybody who runs for office.

"If anybody votes for him, they're crazy," Kazalunas said. "They would have to be a little backward."

In April, Schruender, who at the time identified himself as Dan Collins, said he delivers racist fliers to Rialto neighborhoods to let people know that the white race is not "going to go out with a whimper."

Some of the fliers invited residents to honor Adolf Hitler's birthday. Others used racial epithets to describe blacks and Latinos while saying "happy Easter to all you ... from your friends at the Aryan Nations."

Schruender, who said he is a retired high school teacher, explained that he sometimes goes by the name Collins because it's easier for people to pronounce and spell.

He said he produces the supremacist group's literature, but would not let his ideology affect his policy-making if he were elected to a district that has more than 27,500 students, most of whom are Latino and black.

According to the district office, Latinos make up 75.52 percent of the students, and blacks make up 15.61 percent.

"We have to deal with all kids fairly and evenly, but there are certain things I would like to address," he said.

He would be hard-pressed to convince those who monitor the white supremacist movement in the U.S.

"It strains credulity that someone whose mission is dedicated to the denial of equality should be entrusted with the education of our children," said Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino. "It makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up."

Levin said candidates with links to extremist groups typically try to run stealth campaigns, hoping voters are too distracted to notice who they are affiliated with.

Schruender said he wants to overhaul a curriculum that has been dumbed down by the state of California.

"We've got to find a way for the kids to meet the standards, not the standards to meet the kids," he said.

He said he would work to save vocational programs.

"We are not giving the non-college-bound kids anything," he said.

Schruender said it's unfair that varsity sports continue to be paid for while academic programs suffer cuts.

"We need to concentrate on academics first, vocation second, then athletics last," he said.

Registrar Kari Verjil said Schruender's paperwork is under standard review.

"For school districts and special districts it's a simple process," Verjil said.

Verjil said the deadline to file is Friday at 5 p.m.

Gilbert said she was unaware of Schruender's ties to the white supremacist movement, and didn't want to comment on the issue.

"We have a good board," Gilbert said. "We're working on trying to stay focused on what our needs are. I think the board we have now (is) off to a great start and we want to continue that."

josh.dulaney@inlandnewspapers.com
909-386-3885

Read more: http://www.sbsun.com/ci_15687449?sou...#ixzz0vquiEMQU

__________________________________________________ ____

Here's some examples of their lies and slants. I NEVER, NEVER used the term 'White Supremacist'. I used the term 'White Nationalist'. I NEVER, NEVER, admitted to dropping fliers on people's lawns. I said I have members who do that for me. In truth, I did do that, but I didn't want the cops harassing me on phoney littering charges or other bullshit, so I said other members did it for me. The reporter had no way of knowing that I really did do it, but he said I did anyway.

As far as I'm concerned, I have been libeled and defamed. I'm going to wait a few days to see what else may happen, then I'm going to look into suing them. If AN helps with legal expenses, I will naturally share any court winnings I may receive. But for now, I'm going to wait until perhaps the middle of next week. Hopefully things will die down by then. You all know the average American's attention span is extremely limited. As soon as the next Niggerball game comes on or the next celebrity gets arrested, or the next round of American Idol airs, they'll forget all about this. We'll see. Whatever happens, I'll face it, and deal with it. I'm not going away. I started something, and I finish what I start.

Also, the following is an email I sent to ANP Chairman Rocky Suhayda. He was dead on about the press, but I feel this much uproar was more than anyone would expect over a local, small town election. However, Rocky seems to be copping an "I told you so" attitude. When things like this happen, we should support each other, and not start pointing fingers over who was right and who was wrong.

Dear Rocky,

I remembered what you said about avoiding media circuses and the like, and I was very hesitant to talk to a reporter. This reporter said that a story on me would run whether I talked to him or not. I started trying to imagine what he would say and people's reaction if I refused to comment. It would look like I had something to hide, and that's the way he'd report it, most likely. The only thing better for a paper's ratings than a WN running for office, is a WN who's running for office and won't talk about it. I figured the best thing to do is to answer some questions as honestly as I could, and not volunteer any information, which is what I did. I was well aware that the Jew Media twists everything we have to say, but I thought silence would be more damning. I'm also told another paper is picking up the story. I told them I wasn't interested. All I said was AN was NOT running me for office, and I was doing this on my own. KABC TV also called. I simply told them, "No Comment." Maybe that's what I should have said all along, but like I said, the first reporter said a story would run whether I talked or not. Now I have to deal with the repercussions, such as my parents having to take crap from people because of me. That hasn't happened - yet, and it may never happen. The public has a short attention span. If things simmer down in the press, the public will forget as soon as the next football game is on, or the next round of 'American Idol' aires.

I want to point out that Director Mullet is not at fault here. I did this on my own. He did not put me up to it. Mr. Dulaney, the reporter who wrote the story got my name and number from the Registrar Of Voters. It's a matter of public record. The ROV had to give the press that information. How did he know I was with AN? Back in March, when we did a mass literature hand out, much like ANP's 'Snowlakes In July' campaign, I was contacted by Mr. Dulaney and asked some questions. He had my phone number in his database. He said they often cross check unknown candidates to see if they already have anything on them. Well, he cross checked my information and my phone number popped up. Then he knew who I was and recontacted me. The rest you know.

Security is very important to AN. But in cases like this, silence can be just as damaging, if not more so. I was already a candidate before I informed Director Mullet. He is not hungry for any press, good or bad. This is just an unfortunate occurrance whose repercussions, I'll have to deal with. Director Mullet has stated that he and Aryan Nations will stand behind me, and I know they will. I'm not saying that we don't want any publicity. However, Aryan Nations would not deliberately throw one of its own to the wolves and not care what happens to him in order to get some free publicity.

After this setback, I'm extremely disappointed in your "I told you so" attitude. All WN's should be supporting each other when things like this happen, and not start playing the blame game. Director Mullet feels you have put yourself at an even lower level than Jeff Schoep and the National Satanist Movement.

Say what you like about the press, but they are very good at what they do. This was bound to happen, and I was aware of the possibility. I just wasn't going to let it stop me from doing what I had to do. The only mistake I made was underestimating the level of uproar this would cause. After all, Rialto is a very small town. There are less than 50,000 people here, if I'm not mistaken. I knew there would be some uproar if they knew who I was, I just failed to realise the degree to which the press would stir things up. However, about 80% of those people in Rialto are not White. About 90% of the children who attend Rialto schools are non-Whites. I had that going against me from moment one.

Now that its happened, we have to deal with it. Even if I run unopposed, the ANTIFA will probably find a way to interfere. Well, we all learn from our mistakes. Perhaps because I'm fairly well-known in the movement, running for any office is not realistic. Perhaps my role in the election process should be to support my fellow WN's when they give it a try, and I encourage them to do just that. Director Mullet, myself, and the entire organisation will be there to support them, if needed.

All is NOT lost - at least not yet. I'll have a better idea if it is by next week. If it turns out all is lost, the best thing to do is regroup, and plan our next strategy. One way or another, I'm not throwing in the towel. If we fail this time, we'll try again, and again, and again until we achieve victory.

Whatever happens, I do not blame Director Mullet in any way. Anything that happens is not his fault, nor Bradley Jenkins' fault either. I will continue to post updates on the situation on my blog and the forum. So Rocky, let's all be supportive of one another, rather than condemning.

Dan Schruender