Saturday, July 31, 2010

Mandatory National Service Measure Orders US Citizens To Perform Duties Under Obama

Democrat: Let's have mandatory national service.

By Chelsea Schilling

A bill introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., would reinstate a compulsory military draft during wartime and require U.S. citizens not selected for military duty to perform a "national-service obligation" - as defined by President Obama - for a minimum of two years.

Rangel introduced the Universal National Service Act, or H.R. 5741, on July 15. The measure was referred to the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel on July 23.

Rangel introduced similar bills in 2003, 2006 and 2007. His current bill does not have a co-sponsor.

Rangel took to the floor of the House to reintroduce H.R. 5741, stating, "I have introduced legislation to reinstate the draft and to make it permanent during time of war. It is H.R. 5741, and what this does is to make everyone between the ages of 18 and 42 - whether they're men or women, whether they're straight or gay - to have the opportunity to defend this great country whenever the president truly believes that our national security is threatened."

According to an announcement released by Rangel's office:

The bill provides for a national-service obligation - either military or civilian - for every citizen and permanent resident, male and female, of the U.S., aged 18 to 42.

Persons may be inducted to perform military service only if declaration of war is in effect, or if the president declares a national emergency necessitating the induction of persons to perform military service and immediately informs Congress of the reasons for the declaration.

Defines "national service" as either military or civilian service as defined by the president that promotes national or homeland security.

Gives the president the authority to establish the numbers of persons to be selected for military service and the means of selection.

Requires those not selected for military service to perform their national-service obligation in a civilian capacity for a period of two years.

Directs the president to prescribe the regulations necessary to carry out the act.

Deferments for education are only permitted through completion of high school, to a maximum age of 20.

Deferments may be made for physical or mental disability, or under claims of conscientious objector.

"What troubles me most about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is the total indifference to the suffering and loss of life among our brave young soldiers on the battlefield," Rep. Rangel said. "The reason is that so few families have a stake in the war which is being fought by other people's children.

"The test for Congress, particularly for those members who support the war, is to require all who enjoy the benefits of our democracy to contribute to the defense of the country. All of America's children should share the risk of being placed in harm's way."

Prison Planet writer Rob Dew referenced the following video posted on YouTube and noted, "This echoes the sentiment of President Obama who asked Congress in February 2009 to send him a bipartisan bill in the spirit of national service."

Likewise, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel advocated for similar universal civilian service in a 2006 book, "The Plan: Big Ideas for America."


Well, since I'm over 42, this doesn't affect me. It's not my concern, right? WRONG! It's everyone's concern. Unfortunately, what I said is what most Americans over 42 will say. "Not my problem." This measure will give Obongo virtually unlimited resources to carry on this useless war for Israel, and the Judeo-Capitalists that are no doubt channeling money to his accounts. We must all write our congressmen and senators today and tell them to oppose this bill.
I don't know how much good I can do doing that. My congressman is Joe Baca, and my senators are Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, three of the most left-wing liberals in the Capitol Building.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Let's Lighten Up For One Night!

We're usually so serious here. Let's lighten up for one night.

Husband Down

A husband and wife are shopping in their local Wal-Mart. The husband picks up a case of Budweiser and puts it in their cart. 'What do you think you're doing?' asks the wife. 'They're on sale, only $10 for 24 cans he replies. 'Put them back, we can't afford them demands the wife, and so they carry on shopping. A few aisles further on along the woman picks up a $20 jar of face cream and puts it in the basket. What do you think you're doing?' asks the husband. 'It’s my face cream. It makes me look beautiful,' replies the wife. Her husband retorts: 'So does 24 cans of Budweiser and it's half the price.' On the PA system: 'Cleanup on aisle 25, we have a husband down.'

Wednesday, July 21, 2010


How many children are being raised by a parent who is engaged in this deviant lifestyle? Gay activists claim the figure is somewhere between 6 and 14 million. These figures are rather far apart. Why can't they pin it down better? The reason for that is because this claim is completely untrue.

How did they come up with this figure? They certainly didn't just 'pick a number out of a hat'. People tend to believe exactly what they want to believe, and in that one respect, homosexuals are no different from heterosexuals. Research that favours them they accept, research that goes against them they reject.

Charlotte Patterson, a Lesbian activist and professor at the University Of Virginia conducted some highly questionable research on the effects of Lesbian parenting. To no one's surprise, her results concluded that there was no negative effects on children raised in same-sex households. Indeed, she claimed that in younger children, there were some benefits, as women tend to be more nurturing than most heterosexual men. It is true about SOME men, but not most. For example, she said that when a preschooler fell and scraped their knees and cried, most women will, "kiss it and make it better" while men tend to say to the child, "Quit your sniveling and pull yourself up by your bootstraps", so to speak. Again, some men are like that, but not the majority – at least not any more. She basically said exactly what the Gay Community wanted to hear. It was nothing more than pro – homosexual propaganda.

In one of the first attempts to legalise marriage in the state of New York, Patterson's worthless research was used by the American Psychological Association (APA) to show the court that there would be no harm to any children that might be involved. At that time, they lost,
but since then they have tried in other jurisdictions using the same research. This they have also done in trying to decriminalise sodomy, and the adoption of children by homosexuals.


This inflated figure, which was concocted by Patterson in a paper published in 1992 by "Child Development" magazine. She arrived at this figure by calculating how many homosexuals there were, and statistically how many had children.

The problem is that her figures are based on a false premise, and that being that ten percent of the population is homosexual, which we now know to be completely untrue. It was known to be false at that time, yet she went ahead and based her figures on it anyway as a means to help Gays to adopt children and to legalise same-sex marriage. Propaganda, plain and simple!


The 2000 United States Census showed that there were 72 million children in the country at that time. If there were 14 million children being raised by Gay parents, then one out of five children were being raised by a homosexual. That is absolutely ridiculous! It has been proven that only approximately four percent of the population is Gay, then how could one fifth of our children be in same-sex households? The numbers just don't add up, and numbers never lie, unlike many people.

Even an estimate of three million children is pushing it. If four percent of the population is Gay, does it stand to reason that four percent of the children are being raised by Gays? Of course not. Many homosexuals have never even had children. Out of 1000 Gays who were interviewed, only 256, or about 26 percent had children, so it is far more reasonable to state that there are approximately 600,000 to one million children in this country being raised by homosexuals, or about one percent.

If the figure is as high as one million, statistically, that means 900,000 children were raised by Lesbians, while only 100,000 were raised by Gay men. As we all know, in about 90 percent of divorces, custody is given to the mother. Therefore, when Gay men cite the 14 million figure, they are either completely misinformed, or are outright lying through their teeth.

If homosexuals expect to move their cause forward, then lies and deceptions will only hurt them once they are uncovered. As the old saying goes, "The truth will out." And it usually does. When lies are exposed, it can only foster homophobia. Gay activists are actually setting themselves back. However, anything that halts or at least slows their progress is a good thing. In a way, when they try and mislead people, they are helping the cause of National Socialism, so perhaps we should just let them hang themselves out to dry!


Doctor Gerald Schoenwolf of the National Association For Research of Therapy's Scientific Advisory Committee wrote an article about Patterson's research that states, "Typically, Patterson's study of children of lesbian parents are based on interviews with the children in which they are asked questions about their social adjustment, their sexual orientation, and their mood (happiness); these interviews are also conducted with children of heterosexual parents and then compared. In other studies, projective testing is used (such as the Rorshach Inkblot test). For example, one study involved two groups of 44 children, aged 12 to 18 (children of lesbians and children of heterosexuals). Both groups were said to have similar ethnic backgrounds, family income, well-being, social adjustment, or sexual orientation (percentage of homosexuality) among these youth."

Schoenwolf wonders as to how 44 children can be representative of six to fourteen million? No matter how well it is done, no matter how thorough the questions, 44 cannot possibly represent the entire population. The idea is absolutely preposterous, to say the least. The study would have needed to use at least 500 children to make it anywhere near valid.

Doctor Dean Byrd of the NARTH Scientific Advisory Committee was also incredulous over Patterson's work. During an attempt to legalise same-sex marriage in a Florida court, he explained the flaws in the research. Fortunately, the Florida court agreed and all of Patterson's work was excluded.

It wasn't simply Byrd's opinion that swayed the court. In a way, it was Patterson herself. She refused to turn over her research documentation to her own attorneys. When the court ordered her to do so, she continued to refuse. She was threatened with a charge of contempt of court. In a session in the judge's chambers, her attorneys asked the court to withdraw the order to produce if she agreed to exclude her own research as evidence in the case. Both sides agreed, and the court withdrew the order, and excluded her testimony.

If Patterson's research was valid, why wouldn't she share ALL the information, and no just her conclusions? Because she was well aware that her contained holes large enough to drive a truck through, and it would all come out during cross-examination, and she would be discovered to be the fraud she is.

Patterson stipulated to the fact that she is a lesbian, and that many of her lesbian subjects were close personal friends of hers, and a few were even closer, if you take my meaning. Her study was supposed to be impartial. Alright, perhaps, just perhaps a lesbian scientist could remain impartial, but it would be impossible to do so when your subjects are lovers or close, personal friends. Patterson is nothing but a quack with a specific agenda, and it has nothing to do with scientific truth.

The Traditional Values Coalition states on their website, "Charlotte Patterson's 'research' is simply pro-homosexual propaganda disguised as science. Her research methods are shoddy and unreliable, yet her work is repeatedly reprinted by the American Psychological Association, homosexual activist organisations, and in friend of the court briefs that are used to justify homosexual marriage and homosexual adoption of children."


The American Psychological Association, scientists like Charlotte Patterson et al, and gay activists have all been working hard to spin a web of lies to deceive the American people. Their purpose is to advance the cause of homosexual rights. This they intend to achieve by any means. In 1517, in his political - philosophy book, "The Prince", Niccolo Machiavelli wrote, "The end justifies the means." He ended up in prison. Evidently the government didn't agree with him. Something for all activists to think about.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010



This claim is completely fraudulent. According to the U.S. Department Of The Census, Gays, Lesbians, Bi-Sexuals and Transgender individuals make up less than five percent of the population. This is less than half of what they claim.

A report from the Centers On Disease Control state that only 2.3 considers themselves to be homosexual. These figures came from a national survey conducted in 2002, and is based on interviews with 12,571 individuals, both men and women between the ages of 18 – 44. The report wasn't released, however, until 2005.



The main reason the study stopped at 44-year-olds, is the fact that the life expectancy for Gay men is considerably lower than for Straight men. This is because of a number of reasons. The CDC states that AIDS is far more prevalent in Gay men. Also, Gay men engage in frequent anal sex. The anus was not designed for this. As a result, there is tearing of blood vessels and tissue, which leads to frequent infections, and bowel problems. Because of these factors, the average life expectancy of Gay men is 55.


Because Bi-Sexual men engage in anal sex less frequently, there risk of AIDS and other related problems, their life expectancy is about 60 – 65, depending on how sexually active with other males.


There was no such data available for Transgender individuals, because fewer studies have been done, and many TG men are confused as to which sex they prefer. However, there may be some evidence to suggest that they may have the lowest life expectancy of all.

Transsexuals are the most sexually confused individuals of all. Many are full of self hate and loathing. Many of these men believe that when they complete the sex reassignment process, their lives will be greatly improved. They will feel better about themselves, their confusion will be gone, and they will gain acceptance from society. If after completing the final surgery, and their expectations have not been met, and considering at this point it is irreversible, many begin to suffer from depression, and end up taking their own lives. Indeed, the suicide rate does appear to be disproportionately high among transgender individuals, especially those who have had the final surgery.


Lesbians are in the lowest risk group for AIDS, and since they do not engage in anal sex (unless they use artificial devices), their life expectancy is comparable to Straight women, according to the CDC.


The CDC reports that 80 percent of transvestites are heterosexual, so their life expectancy, as a group, is almost that of normal Straight men.


As recently as 2003, sodomy was still illegal in a few states. In the case of Lawrence v. The State Of Texas, homosexuals were trying to get that law declared unconstitutional. In their brief, Gay activists admitted that the ten percent figure was false. It stated in part, "The most widely accepted study of sexual practices in the United States is the National Health And Social Life Survey (NHSLS). The NHSLS found that 2.8 percent of the male, and 1.4 percent of the female population identify themselves as Gay, Lesbian, or Bi-Sexual."

In all, that adds up to 4.2 percent. This is less than half of the original claim of ten percent. The reason the most homosexuals still persist in using the ten percent figure is purely political propaganda. They feel that the more homosexuals the government thinks there are, the more willing they will be to passing laws giving them a protected status.

A study conducted by Planned Parenthood showed that only 2.3 percent of males aged 20 to 39 said they had experienced a same-sex
relationship in the past ten years. Only 1.1 percent said they were exclusively Gay.

A United States survey conducted in 1989 indicated that no more than six percent of adults had any sort of same-sex relationships. Less than 1 percent claimed they were exclusively homosexual.

The Wall Street Journal published a study conducted by the Minnesota Adolescent Health Survey of public school students that only 0.6 percent of boys and 0.2 percent of girls identify themselves "mostly or 100 percent homosexual", which is less than one percent.


The ten percent figure was drawn from Alfred Kinsey's research on human sexuality conducted in the late 1940's and early 1950's. Today, Kinsey has been largely discredited, and many consider him to be a complete fraud, and that his research was deliberately flawed. However, even Kinsey himself never claimed that ten percent of the population is exclusively homosexual.

What he actually said was ten percent of White males were 'more or less' exclusively homosexual during at least a three year period between the ages of 16 and 55. As broad a statement as that is, it certainly does not mean that ten percent of the population is exclusively homosexual. For one thing, he said, "during a three year period", and not over their entire lifetimes. For another thing, he did not include women or non-White races. Homosexuality occurs less often in women than in men, and the figures vary from one race to another. For example, there is a much higher occurrence of homosexuality in Blacks than in Whites, however it is lower in Asians than in Whites. Also, many of his homosexual subjects were serving prison sentences at the time. Today, it is a known fact that many criminals adopt homosexual behaviours in prison, and return to heterosexuality after they are released. His research failed to take this into account. But to claim that Kinsey said ten percent of the population is Gay is nothing less than a complete distortion of Kinsey's research, which is extremely questionable in and of itself.

According to the United States Department Of The Census, in the year 2000 there were 106,741,426 households in this country. Only 0.42 percent of those are unmarried, same-sex households. That's less than one half of a percent! But even today, some Gay Activists still claim the ten percent figure. This is clearly false homosexual propaganda designed to make them seem larger, more important, and more deserving of special protection from the government than they would be getting if most people knew the real truth.


To this day, legislators, writers, and the Jewish run media still claim ten percent. These people should be challenged to prove their claims with facts and not lies. For them, the problem is that the homosexual agenda could not move forward without extensive use of distortions, half truths, and out and out lies.

If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes more believable. Also, many people believe if they read about something in a reputable newspaper, or see it on television, they think that it has to be true or else it couldn't be printed or aired. People tend to believe exactly what they want to believe whether it makes any sense or not. Most people are lemmings and are easily led – often astray.

It is the duty of National Socialists to repeat the truth over and over until the people begin to see the light. Never be afraid of the truth – even if it is not popular. Remember, it is easy to do the popular thing.
Don't take the easy way. Stand up for the truth.

Monday, July 19, 2010


At one time, not all that long ago, homosexuality was not tolerated
in our society. They were considered mentally ill, and the act of Sodomy was illegal in all 50 states. At that time, homosexuals usually 'stayed in the closet'. In other words, they concealed their perversions out of fear of arrest or institutionalisation. However, little by little, creeping through the body of our society like a cancer, this began to change. First, the act of Sodomy began to be decriminilised state, by state. Then, homosexuality itself was removed from the APA DSM's list of mental illnesses. Then, Gays gained more and more rights and protections under the law. They even have gotten intimidation and violent crimes against them to be classified as 'hate crimes'.

Since homosexuals have now achieved a 'protected status' from both state and the federal governments, more Gays than ever before, are now 'out of the closet'. Many parents fear their children could be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even recruited into this disgusting lifestyle by homosexual predators, also known as 'Chicken Hawks'. Indeed, crimes against children are on the rise, hence the passing of new laws, such as 'Megan's Law.'


The Gay Community dismisses these fears as being completely homophobic in nature. They insist there is absolutely no connection between homosexuality and child-molestation. If this is so, why do a disproportionately large number of Gay men seek teenage boys as sexual partners? Add to this the fact that less than one percent of convicted child molesters are women. The majority are men, although some of their victims are little girls, the majority are boys. Since Gay men are attracted to other males, it is logical to conclude that there are more Gay men convicted of child molestation than Straight men. Arrest records bear this out.

An essay on sex crimes against children entitled, "Sexual Offending Against Children" reported, It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that the female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offenses. With 3000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!"

A report by the American Professional Society On The Abuse Of Children states, "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male."

A study in the Journal Of Sex Research states, "Pedophilia is extremely rare in women."

The Gay Community denies a connection, but the arrest records bear it out, and psychologists, who are usually allies of homosexuals also confirm this. They also confirm that the majority of the victims are

A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in the Journal Of Sex And Marital Therapy found that "Approximately one third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."

The Journal Of Child Psychiatry stated, "It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about nine to one, but but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. The majority of community studies suggest a ratio of two to four." Boys are abused twice as much as girls.


Scientist now believe that it has always been this way. The problem for them was in times past, fewer cases of homosexual abuse was reported. Homosexuality had always been considered indecent by society. Gays were labelled as 'fruits', 'faggots', and 'sissies'. Even today amongst children, about the worst name one boy can call another is 'fag'. How many times have we, as adults heard our children say to other children in a derogatory tone something like, "Man, that is so Gay!"

Because of this, when a boy was abused, he was often too ashamed and humiliated to tell anyone. Fear of being labelled a 'fag' kept him silent. However, as homosexuality has moved into the mainstream of society, more and more boys are finding the courage to come forward.

The Department Of Justice's report on child sexual exploitation states, "Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behaviour and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization."

The Journal Of Child Psychology adds, "Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report."

This is very understandable. The last thing any teenage boy wants to be thought of is queer. Even homosexual teenagers fear this due to harassment, intimidation, and violence. Most Gays don't admit their perversions until adulthood.


The Psychiatric Journal Of The University Of Ottowa [Canada] noted that nearly half of convicted pedophiles preferred boys.

The Archives Of Sexual Behaviour also states homosexual pedophiles are vastly overrepresented in child sex offenses cases.

Homosexuals only make up about three percent of the population (contrary to the more popular, but inaccurate ten percent). However, a study conducted by the journal of Child Abuse And Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further twenty eight percent target both sexes, bringing the total of Gay and Bisexual offenders to forty two percent.

Gays and Bisexuals account for only a small percentage of the population, but account for nearly half of the cases. It should also be noted that, although this is no excuse, at least half of the heterosexuals convicted of molesting little girls did it, not for sexual gratification, but in the production of child pornography, which is technically a separate crime. Indeed many Straights convicted of such offenses stated they preferred women, but did what they did to make money. Unfortunately, there is a lot of money to be made in that filthy business. On the other hand, while some homosexuals molested little boys for the purposes of pornography, the majority did it simply for sexual gratification.


David Thorstad, former president of the New York Gay Activist's Alliance, officially opposes age of consent laws which prohibit adults from having sex with children. This vile, disgusting piece of filth is an admitted pedophile, and founding member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It's incredible that vermin like this are allowed to run around free, but considering the times we live in, it shouldn't be much of a surprise.

Thorstad argues that there is a natural attraction between homosexual men and young boys. He has expressed bitterness that the homosexual rights movement has abandoned pedophiles. But there has always been reluctance on the part of the mainstream Gay Rights movement to accept pedophiles, especially Lesbian groups.

The Lesbian Feminist Liberation movement has officially accused NAMBLA of, "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. Feminists easily recognise this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." They also officially condemn heterosexual pedophilia. It seems that even Lesbians have a little motherly instinct in them.


Despite some opposition, Thorstad claimed that by 1985, pedophiles had won acceptance within the Gay community. Jim Kepner, the then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles remarked, "A point I've been trying to make is
that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks [Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Alexander The Great were all admitted homosexuals – author's note], Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be Gay today."

I would like to point out to the reader, that contrary to what Mr. Kepner said, it has NEVER been proven that Shakespeare or Da Vinci were Gay. Simply because they never married, and had no known "lady friends" is supposition, not proof. There are some individuals who seem to care very little about having sex. The other names mentioned were all known or admitted homosexuals.

Eventually, NAMBLA was officially recognised by Gay Right's groups. However in 1990, this cost the Gay And Lesbian Association its status. The United Nations refused to recognise them as a Non-Governmental Political Organisation because they were protecting admitted criminals (pedophiles) and admitting them as members.

The Gay and Lesbian Association eventually divorced themselves from NAMBLA, and regained partial acceptance from the U.N. However, many countries, Islamic States in particular are still wary of them and have outlawed them in their countries. The GLA still refuses to allow foreign governments access to their membership lists, so it is suspected that they have not severed all ties to pedophile groups, and indeed still have members who are known to them to be pedophiles.


There is a great deal of evidence that most homosexuals were themselves abused as children. This abuse may have the result of leading them toward homosexuality and/or pedophilia. This is what is often referred to as a vicious cycle.

The Journal Of The American Medical Association did a study of 279 homosexual and bisexual men and reported, "More than half of the subjects reported a sexual act with a male by the age of 16 years, approximately 20 percent by the age of ten years."

A study conducted by the International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology reported, "In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent reported that they had engaged very often in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred 'sometimes.' "

The National Institute Of Justice reported, "The odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than people who experienced no victimization as children."


Pedophiles often seek employment as teachers, counsellors, or clergymen. These are what are known as "positions of special trust."
This way, they put themselves into close contact with children, and are often alone with them for extended periods of time.


Most of us are aware of the child molestation scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church in recent years. Victims are coming forward, sometimes as much as 20 years later. However, it should be pointed out, they many of these 'victims' came forward AFTER the first few victims sued the Church and won large sums of money. Many of the later so-called victims have been proven liars with the goal of extorting large judgements from the Church, ruining the reputations of innocent clergymen in the process. But most are sincere and are telling the truth. Many Gay pedophiles entered the priesthood so they would be in a position to victimize young boys (usually alter boys or members of the choir) with impunity. Fortunately, more and more of these vermin are being exposed. We must however be careful and determine which 'victims' are seeking justice, and which are liars seeking money.

It is sad to learn that priests who are accused, and even convicted of child molestation are NOT removed from the priesthood. Many are transferred out of the country, and are still allowed to work closely with children. The Church, unfortunately usually tries to do whatever it can to keep things as quiet as possible, so as not to tarnish the Church's image, not to mention saving them the cost of a lawsuit.


School is an excellent venue for a Chicken Hawk to hunt for prey. Teachers are alone with their students for hours. When a teacher asks a student to see him after class, he may have more than the discussion of schoolwork in mind.

I am a former high school English teacher. I never allowed myself to be alone with any student. Not that I was trying to avoid temptation, but I was concerned over a possible misunderstanding, so I always spoke to a student 'alone' in front of a wide-open door with plenty of passers-by who could see us. Since the school board always errs on the side of caution in these matters, so better safe than sorry!

However, I was very distressed to learn that only 40 percent of teachers and other school personnel accused of sexual misconduct were terminated (most were non-tenured teachers or substitutes). Sixty percent were transferred to desk jobs where they would not be coming into contact with children.


What better place to molest a child than when they're at summer camp. Becoming a Boy Scout Camp Counsellor or Troop Leader is a homosexual pedophiles dream come true. In the beginning, known or admitted homosexuals were disqualified from becoming Scout leaders. The first time Gay Rights Activists took this to the United States Supreme Court, they lost. The High Court said that since the Scouts were a private organisation, they were within their rights. When this issue was brought again to the Court in the 1990's, the decision was reversed. The Court said that to bar homosexuals from any non-religious organisation for no other reason than the fact that the person in question is Gay is clearly a violation of his Constitutional rights under the amended 1964 Civil Rights Act which guarantees that no person shall be discriminated against, "because of race, colour, creed, or sexual orientation."


If you're a pedophile, and a doctor, nurse or medical assistant, and you're alone in an examining room with a child, and you can say, "Take off your clothes." You're in pervert paradise.

Fortunately, the American Medical Association takes sexual improprieties with children or adults extremely seriously. If you get caught with 'your hand in the cookie jar', so to speak, not only could you face criminal charges, plus you could lose your licence. Especially for doctors, this is no small matter. Most homo doctors behave themselves, but every now and again you hear about a case. The Law and the AMA usually move quickly on these scum.


It has only been about twenty years since the courts started to fully appreciate the seriousness of this problem. Until about 1990, in most states in this country, child molestation was a misdemeanor. There was one case in San Diego, California in 1975 of a pedophile who was convicted five times for molesting boys. His first sentence was probation for a year. Second was 30 days. Third was 90 days. Fourth was six months. His fifth was one year in county jail, of which he served seven months. Can you believe that comrades? Seven months for utterly destroying a child's life forever. In my opinion, hanging would have been too good for that piece of filth!

Now the courts are beginning to realise what these animals are. Now they are meting out much more serious punishment. If they want some kind of psychiatric help, they get it, but they still have to sit out their sentences. Thanks to Megan's Law, when they do get out, they have to register themselves as a sex offender for life.

Before Megan's Law, they only had to register as long as they were on parole or probation. Before the computer age, they could easily drop out of sight, use a false name and start again somewhere else. Thankfully, it's more difficult these days to adopt a false identity, which is one reason we must protect ourselves from identity theft. Credit card fraud accounts for only 40 percent of identity thefts. Many of these cases are child molesters trying to drop out of sight so they can more easily victimize children again. How would you feel if you found out someone stole your identity and molested a child and the police came to your door? You should be able to prove your innocence easily, but you'd still be mad as hell that you'd even have to, all because of some pervert.

Prison can be frightening. That's good. Let those lowlifes create their own hell. I worked for two years in the California Penal System. I taught the GED program to convicts. It was actually easier than teaching high school. When I have the authority to give the cons three days in the hole, on my say so alone, believe me, most of them are going to follow my classroom rules and do their work.

When I first started working there, I noticed some cons were wearing special coveralls with the letters PC on the back. This doesn't stand for 'politically correct'. It stands for 'protective custody'. This means you are under surveillance much more than ordinary cons, and they don't mix with the general prison population. Most of these PCs are convicted pedophiles. The reason for them being in protective custody is that if the regular cons find out what these creatures are, they'll be killed. That tells you something right there. If a whole prison full of scumbags considers pedophiles to be lowlifes, that's pretty low!

Sunday, July 18, 2010


Our society is disintegrating rapidly, and the homosexual agenda, which is only a small part of the larger Jewish agenda is accelerating this. The Jews are attacking Aryan culture from many sides: Politics, economics, art, literature, the media, and through this perverted lifestyle our most important institution – the family. Now they are demanding the right to marry. Several states, such as Massachusetts have already legalised same-sex marriages. A few years ago, California, a state known for being liberal, surprisingly passed a law which said only a marriage between a man and a woman would be recognised.

Gay activists immediately challenged this law, which was passed, not by the legislature, but by a vote of the people of California. It was later struck down by the State Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. As a result, for a brief time, same-sex marriage was legal in California.

Since the law was ruled unconstitutional, that meant of course, that it went against the state constitution. Family rights advocates decided that the only answer would be to amend the constitution so the law would be able to stand. An amendment to the state constitution was drafted, and brought before the people for a vote.

On the ballot, it was referred to as "Proposition Eight". The Gay Rights activists immediately launched a campaign of intimidation. They tried their very best to make the voters feel that if they voted for Proposition Eight, they would be hateful, homophobic bigots. Despite their efforts, the majority of the voters did not cave in to the pressure. They kept their principles and voted for what they felt was right, irregardless of the campaign of hate launched against them.

Fifty eight percent of the people voted 'yes' on Proposition Eight, and the ban on same-sex marriages was restored. In the short time it was legal, hundreds of homosexual couples were married in the state of California. The courts ruled that since these marriages were performed at a time when they were legal, those who were married during this period would remain legally married.

Even though traditional values won out, activists are not giving up. They are preparing to challenge Proposition Eight in federal court as being improperly written, which therefore makes it invalid as a constitutional amendment. If they win, then the amendment would be ruled null and void, and Gay marriages would once again be legal in California.

If the amendment stands, then the issue of marriage for homosexuals is settled in California, until such time as activists can convince the voters to repeal it. If it does stand, the federal government can in no way act against it, as marriage is a state's rights issue, and the U.S. Constitution forbids federal interference (not that that has stopped the feds from violating the Constitution in the past).

If the amendment is invalidated in federal court, family values activists already have plans to redraft the amendment in a way which would conform to the federal ruling. As this ruling has not as yet been made, there is no way to do a redraft in advance, because they won't know how to reword it to conform to the federal court's ruling.

Only time will tell who will win. We can only hope that the drafters of Proposition Eight did their jobs properly. If they did, then all will be well. If they didn't, well, we'll just have to wait and see. But the eyes of the nation are on California on this issue. If we lose this one, then in less than five years same-sex marriage could be legal in all 50 states.


Homosexuals and lesbians claim that they want the right to marry and live like any other couple, and in some cases, perhaps even in the majority of cases they may indeed be sincere. However, a hardcore group of Gay activists have an entirely different agenda in mind. If these fanatics get their way, it could mean the end of marriage as we know it, and a completely new institution, which is based not on traditional values, but the perverted lifestyles of the typical homosexual.

Many Gay activists are beginning to openly admit to this. Michelango Signorile, a homosexual journalist wrote, "homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely. The most subversive action lesbians and gays can undertake – and one that would perhaps benefit all of society – is to transform the notion of 'family' all together.

If they only want to be like other people, why should they want to do this? The family is a father and mother raising their children. How else could it be defined decently? True, you don't have to be related by blood to raise children. Many people adopt kids, and raise them as if they were their own flesh and blood, and that's fine, so long as the parents are moral, upstanding people. Homosexuals are neither moral nor upstanding. To allow them to raise children is child abuse at best, and an atrocity at worst.

Not all Gays want as close to a 'traditional' family as their kind can get. Some want to raise kids as two dads or two moms. That's bad enough, but some of these hardcore degenerates want to raise kids in households with multiple Gay partners, and each of the several partners would be considered as much a parent as any other. Some even feel that if one or two of the adults are indeed the biological parent of one or more of the children, they see no need to inform the child which is his real father, as each partner is considered just as much the father, or mother, for that matter, as every other adult. I should remind the reader that some homosexuals do indeed have children from say, a former marriage before they 'realised' they were Gay, or by a surrogate mother, using the father's own sperm. The same for Lesbians. They will often go to a sperm bank, or get a male friend to impregnate them.

Lesbian activist and professor of law Paul Ettelbrick said, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to marriage and of radically reordering society's views on marriage."

There are many other examples of well-known activists who have made similar statements. These people are not just John and Jane average homosexuals. They are doctors, lawyers, journalists, authors, and other people of great influence. They are not advocates of marriage, but enemies bent on its destruction. If they succeed, they will replace traditional marriage with something more akin to their own degenerate lifestyles. Something that will totally destroy the morals and values that we, as National Socialists cherish. We cannot allow this to happen. If we give these deviants the same rights and privileges as normal people, then our land will literally become the new Sodam and Gommorah.

In 2008, two female law students in San Diego, Ca., drafted a legislative proposal that would have officially outlawed marriage in the state if it passed. Fortunately, no legislator was even remotely interested. It didn't stand a chance – at this time, at least.

These two women, both of whom claim to be Straight, said they did this because they believe the entire concept of marriage and family to be biased against Gays, and that it was time that this archaic concept was eliminated. So, because a tiny minority feels left out, the rest of us are expected to give up a time-honoured tradition, and live a life of immorality and indecency. Because present-day morals are becoming non-existent, our society is breeding more and more people like these two young girls. It will only get worse unless we restore our traditional values and morals.

One of the current Gay Rights platform demands is: "The repeal of
of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, the complete legalisation of all perversions. Comrades, we must never allow this to happen.

Saturday, July 17, 2010


Interestingly enough, at the beginning of the Gay Rights movement the term "sexual preference" was used frequently. For the past few decades however, this has been changed to "sexual orientation." This was done because the former implied a choice in the matter of sexual behaviours, while the latter implied that these urges are inborn or genetic and cannot be changed.

In 1979, homosexual rights groups lobbied for a congressional bill that stated, in part that in any legislation involving Gay rights, term sexual orientation was to be used, rather than sexual preference. This has given these groups enormous political power. We all have choices. If a criminal carjacks you at gun point and orders you to run down a helpless child or else he'll blow your brains out, you can choose to comply with his demands, or refuse and allow him to kill you. It's the same with sexual preference. You can choose to act on your deviant urges, or suppress them and behave as a heterosexual for the good of society. But claiming homosexuality is inborn or genetic, you can't help yourself, so you're off the hook, so to speak when it comes to choices. Barring illness or accident, we're all going to die of old age, and there is no choice. They claim it is the same with being Gay.

The Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Commission states on its website: "Homosexuality is not a choice, any more than being left-handed or having blues or being heterosexual is a choice. It's an orientation, part of who you are. The choice is in deciding how to live your life."


As was previously stated, the American Psychological Association has confirmed this "born Gay" nonsense. Joining them in the spread of this rubbish is the National Education Association. They sent out a pamphlet to every school superintendent in the country. It was entitled, "Just The Facts", despite that fact that it consisted of nothing but lies, half-truths ans speculations, such as "Sexual orientation is one component of a person's identity, which is made up of other components, such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits."

This is utter nonsense. There are homosexuals all over the world, composed of every ethnicity, culture, and gender. To say these factors have anything to do with whether a person is more or less likely to be Gay is ridiculous. Of course, anyone who tries to refute these views is immediately accused of suffering from a non-existent mental condition called "homophobia". This is the same tactic as used by the Jews. Anyone who speaks out against the Jews is labelled and Anti-Semite. Anyone who speaks out against Gays is automatically a homophobic. This has the effect of making the general population afraid to speak up out of fear of these rather negative sounding labels. It's been working rather well for the past few decades.


In recent years, more and more psychological researchers are beginning to admit that they can find no evidence of the so-called "Gay Gene". The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality has published these admissions which state there is absolutely no basis for the belief that people are born Gay or Straight.
One the authors of this report, researcher Dr. Dean Hamer stated, "There is not a single master gene that makes people gay...I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be Gay."

Simon LeVay, another researcher conducted extensive studies in the differences of the brains of homosexual and heterosexual men. He admitted he found no evidence at all of a genetic cause of homosexuality in men. He said that although you cannot as yet rule out genetics, he didn't find a smidgeon of evidence that is compelling.
At least some researchers have not been intimidated by the Gay lobby into either fabricating results, or suppressing them.


Camille Paglia, a noted Lesbian author and Gay rights activist has
come out on the side of those of us with some common sense. She has stated emphatically, "Homosexuality is not 'normal'...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born Gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."

Any sensible, reasonable person can see this. The whole reason for sex is to perpetuate the species. Nature designed sex to be pleasurable, to induce animals to do it. Since animals are unaware that sex is necessary to reproduce, why would they engage in it unless it were pleasurable. Even among humans, if it were not pleasurable, the human race would probably have died out a long time ago. Therefore, nature never planned on homosexuality. It is a mistake, a flaw in its design.


The APA's answer to that question of course would be no. They do not consider it to be an illness of any kind. After all, someone cannot be cured of an illness that doesn't exist. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Well, it would be, if it were true.

The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality (NARTH) vehemently disagrees with the APA. They agree with Camille Paglia's assessment that it is an adaptive behaviour, and any behaviour of this type can be altered if the patient wants to badly enough. The problem is, most either enjoy their deviant lifestyles and don't want to change.

One of the men behind the APA's decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM was Dr. Robert Spitzer. He now works for NARTH and has completely changed his mind on the issue. He is now convinced he was wrong and that homosexual behaviour can be changed through therapy.

Spitzer has reported that after interviewing 100 homosexuals and 100 lesbians, each stated that after five years of therapy, they had moved partially or in some cases completely from Gay to Straight behaviour. The problem with this approach is that it is long, intense, and costly. It can be very hard on the patient, and many people would feel it is easier to live with the condition. Also, a great number of people would find the therapy cost-prohibitive.


For some time now, activists have used this 'born Gay' nonsense to their advantage. They have gotten the government to enact laws giving them special considerations, and any crimes committed against them labelled as 'hate crimes'. Do these tactics remind you of another group of people? It should. Both groups operate in very similar ways and for good reason. There will be more on that later.

Using their fraudulent claims, activists have even managed to get homosexual recruitment programs in the public schools in an effort to indoctrinate our children in to this degrading, unnatural lifestyle. This is done under the pretense of providing 'a safe environment' for Gay teenagers, and 'education' for the students, and 'sensitivity' training for teachers.

More recently, activists have been pushing for similar treatment for so-called 'transgender' individuals to protect them from societal disapproval. They are using the same tactics for them. Statistically, eight out of ten trangender people are male-to-female. They are claiming that although these individuals were born with the bodies of males, they were also born with the emotions, though processes, and behaviour patterns as females, so they should be treated as women, right down to allowing them to use public women's restrooms, as many of them feel 'uncomfortable' going in the presence of men. It doesn't seem to bother them that many women feel uncomfortable going in the presence of men – even if they do think and feel as females.


One of the current terms used is one I really like: Gender Confusion. Many homosexuals are out and out perverts. But many are simply confused about their feelings and desires. They are told that homosexuality is not an illness yet they know something isn't right about it. Many would like help, but don't have any idea what to do. Most psychiatrists won't see them, because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing wrong with these people. Many churches tell them that they are sinners and must resist these urges. Easier said than done. If you wish to quit smoking, there are many products to help you. If you want to quit alcohol or drugs there's AA and NA. Overweight individuals have Overeaters Anonymous. Maybe someone could form a 'Homosexuals Anonymous" group, so that those who want to change have someplace to turn to.

Doctor George Rekers, an expert on gender confusion disorders states, "Gender nonconformity in childhood may be the single common observable factor associated with homosexuality. Some of the typical childhood factors leading to homosexuality are: Feeling of being different from other children; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved and unapproving; perception of mother being too close, too involved; diminished or distorted masculinity or femininity; premature introduction to sexuality; and gender confusion.

Other noted researchers claim that boys who are overly attached to their mothers run a high risk of becoming homosexuals. Also, children who are sexually molested at a young age as seven times as likely as boys who were not molested to become Gay. These studies can be found on the NARTH website.


There are literally dozens of different kinds of deviant sexual behaviours such as bestiality, sado-masochism, pedophilia, and necrophilia to name just a few. These could all be considered a type of sexual orientation. At the APA convention in 2003, two psychiatrists presented a paper which actually argued that these behaviours – including pedophilia should be removed from the DSM. The names of these two miserable excuses for scientists are Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz. Is anyone surprised at the fact that both of them are Jewish? We, as National Socialists are well aware of Jewish efforts to undermine and destroy Western Culture. If were up to them, not even our children would be safe from sexual predators.

In addition, homosexual lobby groups have even fueled efforts to normalise adult/child sex by lowering the age of legal consent. This would effectively legalise the actions of child predators. If this ever happened, then the Jews, who are known practitioners of child sex themselves, would truly have won a major victory against the Aryan people, and we would literally be one step away from utter destruction. This is something we dare not risk. Homosexuality must be eliminated from our society at all costs.

Friday, July 16, 2010


The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is responsible for the publication of the "Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders" (DSM). This is updated every few years as new studies are made, and as new theories are put forth. On the whole, this book is an extremely valuable tool for the mental healthcare profession. For
example, in DSM-I, those who suffered from manic-depressive disorder, also known as bi-polar disorder were usually institutionalised. However, it is known today that with the proper medication, people with bi-polar disorder can control their condition and lead normal, productive lives. DSM-VI does NOT recommend institutionalisation unless the patient has demonstrated that they are a danger to themselves or others.

In 1973, the APA removed homosexuality from DSM-II. They claim to have based there decision on new scientific evidence that proves homosexual behaviour is normal and should be accepted in our society. This decision was hailed as a victory by Gay Rights Activists, who continually point to this decision as one of the reasons why their lifestyle should be affirmed. The Catholic Church issued a formal statement condemning this decision as being detrimental to the health and well-being of a decent, Christian society.

The removal of homosexuality from the DSM has given Gay Rights Activists the credibility they need to demand that their unnatural lifestyles should be tolerated, even though there is no hard evidence to suggest that there is an truth to these assertions at all. It is just more liberal lies and half-truths used to infiltrate a destructive influence into every aspect of Western culture. These are nothing but false premises, and must be dragged into the open and exposed to the light of truth.


The APA's Diagnostic And Statistical Manual is written and revised by Psychiatrists and Psychologists who work for the organisation. For those of you who are uncertain of the difference, a psychologist holds a PhD in psychology. A psychiatrist holds both a PhD and an MD. Therefore a psychiatrist may prescibe medications to patients, while a psychologist cannot.

Since the APA writes its own rules and regulations, they usually reflect the personal and political views of its authors. Outside forces also play a significant role. Organisations such as the APA have known to be influenced by political groups such as the Gay Liberation Front and B'nai Brith's infamous Anti-Defamation League, not to mention the American Civil Liberties Union.

In 1981, Dr. Ronald Bayer, a pro-homosexual psychiatrist stated that the first attack on the APA by Gay Rights activists occurred in 1970 when the organisation held its National Convention in San Francisco. Under the circumstances, this was an unfortunate choice of locations. These activists decided to disrupt the proceedings by constantly interrupting speakers, and shouting down and ridiculing any psychiatrist who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder.

The following year in 1971, a Gay activist named Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front to demonstrate against the convention. At the conference, Kameny commandeered a microphone and shouted, "Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate! Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you!"

Activists forged APA credentials to gain access to the members only areas of the conference. They threatened anyone who claimed that homosexuality was a sickness that needed to be cured. No one, however was actually attacked.

Kameny managed to find an ally inside of the APA. This was Dr. Kent Robinson who helped the activist present his demand that homosexuality be removed from the DSM. At the 1972 convention, as incredible as it sounds, Gay activists were permitted to set up a display booth with a sign that read, "Gay, Proud, and Healthy". They may have been Gay and proud, but as we all know, they were far from
being healthy.

Kameny, who was not a psychiatrist or psychologist or even a member of the APA, was then permitted to be a part of the panel of experts who were to discuss the issue of homosexuality. It was at this convention that the decision to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the next edition of the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual For Mental Disorders was made. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with scientific discoveries, but was the direct result of politics, threats, and intimidation.


Prior to the APA's 1973 convention, an attempt was made by several psychiatrists to organise an opposition to the decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM. By the way, in DSM-II, homosexuality was, appropriately enough, the first abnormal behaviour listed under section "302. Sexual Deviations." Dr. Irving Bieber, who was surprisingly a noted Jewish psychiatrist led the effort to oppose the decision, along with Dr. Charles Socarides and formed the Ad Hoc Committee Against The Deletion Of Homosexuality From DSM-II. Their concerns fell largely on deaf ears. The majority of the APA had become so intimidated by the activists, that all that was needed was a final confirmation by the APA's Board Of Trustees.


After nearly three years of political pressure, threats and intimidation, in 1973, a committee of highly placed members of the APA met behind closed doors and voted for removal. Opponents were given only 15 minutes to protest this decision, according to Dr. Jeffrey Satinover. Whenever a major decision such as this is made, opponents are given this opportunity to speak, not that opponents have much of a chance with only 15 minutes. Rather than changing the committee's minds, it was instead decided that the issue would be voted on by the entire APA membership. Another Gay rights organisation called "The National Gay Task Force" purchased the APA's mailing list and sent out letters to every APA member urging them to vote to remove homosexuality as a disorder from the DSM. No APA member was informed that this was funded by a Gay Rights group.

While Dr. Satinover was attending a conference in England in 1994, he related a story of a man he met there who told him that he had been in the Gay lifestyle for many years, but then had left. He recounted that he and his "partner", after the 1973 decision, along with a very highly placed member of the APA's Board Of Trustees were celebrating their victory. It seems that Gay Rights activists had managed to place in high positions within the APA itself, people who had maneuvered things to ensure victory. This highly placed member was presented to both the membership and the general public as a disinterested party who was searching solely for the truth to whether homosexuality was a mental disorder or not. Now that's a good one! They actually had their own people on the inside to make certain that the vote went their way irregardless of the actual truth! It was also revealed that some of these people were Jews, which is no surprise, as it is a well known fact that Jews dominate the mental health profession, amongst other things.


Several prominent psychiatrists spoke out on how Gay Rights activists really accomplished this. Dr. Charles Socarides publicly stated, "This was done without any valid scientific evidence to prove that homosexuality is not a behaviour disorder. To declare a condition a 'non-condition', a group of practitioners had removed it from our list of serious psychosexual disorders. The action was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved an out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports, but also a number of other serious studies by groups of psychiatrists, psychologists, and educators over the past seventy years..."

"For the next 18 years, the APA decision served as a Trojan Horse,
opening the gates to widespread psychological and social change in sexual customs and mores. The decision was to be used on numerous occasions for numerous purposes with the goal of normalising homosexuality and elevating it to an esteemed status.

"To some American psychiatrists, this action remains a chilling reminder that if scientific principles are not fought for, they can be lost – a disillusioning warning that unless we make no exceptions to science, we are subject to the snares of political factionalism and the propagation of untruths to an unsuspecting and uninformed public, to the rest of the medical profession, and to the behavioural sciences."


By the rationale of the Gay activists, if a disease or a disorder is offensive to those who have it, it should no longer be considered a disease or a disorder. Since many people who have say, Turret's Syndrome, which is characterised by uncontrolled ticks and vocalisations, do indeed feel ostracised from 'normal' people, perhaps the medical profession should remove it from their list of diseases and disorders. If that happened, then they would no longer be ill, because doctors say it is no longer an illness, so that would make them as normal as you or me. We could do this for any affliction which offends its victims. Hey, using this method, we could eliminate all illness from the world simply by declaring the various illnesses as no longer being illnesses. That's brilliant, isn't it?! No, it's absolutely ridiculous. But that's exactly what Gay Rights activists have done with homosexuality. They got it removed from the catalogue of mental disorders, so therefore, they are as normal as you and me.

What has been the result of this absurd decision? A rapid deterioration of American morals and values. At one time in this country, morality and decency were respected virtues. Now they are scorned as being "old-fashioned", or bigoted.

For those who still deny this, think back. When did our values and morals start to go down the toilet? It was the latter part of the 1960's when Gay Rights groups started to appear and make their voices heard. Once this began, the handle was pushed, and morality and decency began to go right down to the sewer.

Comrades, it's not too late. We can return to the time-honoured values this country once held sacred. To do this, the truth must be told. The Jew/Communist lies must be exposed. This is what the Aryan Nations is trying to accomplish. Don't listen to liberal lies. They have their own agenda, and it has nothing to do with decency.

Thursday, July 15, 2010


The liberal, Jew controlled media would have the American people believe that homosexuals are just like everyone else. This could not be further from the truth. For years, the Jews and liberals have been slowly destroying the moral fabric of American society with things such as the use of illicit drugs, pornography, excessive drinking, violent entertainment, and also with what they are fond of calling "alternative lifestyles".

This is a catch-all phrase used by the media, and academia to describe any lifestyle that deviates from the traditional nuclear family which at one time was the back bone of the United States Of America, and the rest of the Civilised World. It can mean anything from a man and woman living together out of wedlock, or a so-called "open marriage" where the man and woman, with mutual consent, have sexual relations with other people (this is also known as "swinging"), or worst of all, a same sex couple living together and having sexual relations as if they were married.

In a National Socialist America, the first two are nowhere near as harmful as homosexuality, an unnatural and degrading lifestyle. Back in the 1970's there was a saying, "If it feels good, do it!" This immoral philosophy was used as an excuse to engage in the most depraved and disgusting sexual practises such as promiscuity, bondage, bestiality, and of course homosexuality. These practises which were glamourised by the liberal media, served to undermine and slowly destroy the most important of our institutions: The Family Unit.

Most people are familiar with the sign over the gates of Hell in "Dante's Inferno" that read, "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter Here", but there were actually two signs. The second one had an arrow pointing and it read, "This way to join the lost people." We don't need the first sign, at least not yet. But America has indeed become a nation of lost people. Due to the Jewish agenda, facilitated by our mass media, America has lost its way. But we still have hope. There is a way back to the decent, moral country this land once was. To that statement, many people would ask, "How?"

Any good physician will tell you that the first step to curing any disease, is to first understand it. If you don't understand what you're fighting, then you're doomed to failure. The first step on the road to victory is enlightenment. As an old Chinese general once said, "Know thy enemy, and know thyself, and victory will be thine."

Someone might ask, "Hey, are we at war or what?" The answer to that question is: Yes! We most definitely are at war. This is a war over morality vs. immorality, decency vs.indecency, and the natural vs. the unnatural. The first step to winning this war is to understand who and what we are up against, and what they really want.

In the following articles, this is exactly what we will do. We will learn the real truth about the scourge of homosexuality. This is a disease every bit as deadly as the Black Plague which killed 75 million people in the Fourteenth Century. This is said literally, as homosexuals are responsible for the spread of another disease known as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). As long as this sickness was confined to the homosexual community, it was of no concern to normal, decent people. But it was bound to jump from the Gay community, to our own, and in the 1980's, that's exactly what happened. Unlike heterosexuals, homosexuals are loathe to use condoms, which substantially reduce the risk of AIDS infection. Since some people are bisexual, it was inevitable that this would happen. Because of the immorality and thoughtlessness of a small segment of the population, virtually everyone, including those in monogamous marriages and the celibate are at risk.

It can often take years for symptoms to manifest themselves, but an infected person can still unknowingly pass on the infection by donating, or selling contaminated blood to an unscrupulous bloodbank who may not screen donors as they should. Hundreds of people in this country have become infected by receiving tainted blood. Although bloodbanks are being more careful these days, a bad batch can slip by due to incompetent screeners, or even due to an honest oversight.

AIDS, in and of itself is not fatal. This insidious disease robs the body of its natural ability to ward of other types of infection, so that even the common cold can be deadly. At this time, there is no cure, and once symptoms manifest themselves, the victim has an average life expectancy of approximately five years. The last year in the life of an AIDS patient can be so excruciating, most are literally praying to die in the end.

The number one spreaders of this horrible affliction are still homosexuals. Among heterosexuals, the incidence of infections is actually declining because of responsible sexual practices such as the use of condoms, avoiding sexual encounters with strangers, monogamous marriage, and celibacy, which is of course, much easier said than done!

But in the Gay Community, promiscuity is the norm, and not the exception. Monogamous relationships, although increasing in number, are still in the minority. It's not that these people have no common sense, but they are driven by unnatural urges which they find difficult to control. Also, the fact that they never have to be concerned about unplanned pregnancies, makes them feel even freer to act out their perversions to the fullest.

Interestingly enough, the group with the lowest incidence of AIDS is the Lesbian Community. Doctors say this is because two women cannot penetrate each others bodies as two men can. Also, women tend to be less promiscuous, and can control their urges better than men can. Come on guys, you know it's true. Most of us (but not all) are just a bunch of hound dogs, at least until we meet that very special lady and decide it's time to settle down. But until that happens, most of us are always on the prowl!

With this in mind, we will explore many myths and misconceptions regarding both homosexuals and lesbians which the liberals and their stooges in the media have propagated over the years. However, many ultra-religious groups have put forth their own myths and misconceptions over the years. For example, there are those who say that AIDS is a curse from God, to punish the immoral. This is just as much a load of bunk as is what the media hands us. HIV/AIDS is simply a disease that by random chance found its way into the Homosexual Community and was spread by their unnatural and careless practises.

Since the appearance of AIDS, many good, decent people that have contracted it through tainted blood have died. I don't believe that God would send such a curse against the immoral and when some innocent people die he would say, "Oh well, some innocents might die. Can't be helped." Do you think our God and his son Jesus Christ would be so callous? I don't believe it for one minute.

A wise man once said that there are two sides to every story, and the truth, more often than not, lies somewhere in between. That's where we'll be going: To the real truth. Remember another saying, "The truth will set you free."

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Mega-Jew Bloomberg : Give A Green Card To Anyone Who Wants One

WASHINGTON (AP) - New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the country is "giving shortshrift to immigration" and that economic problems will worsen until America sends out a more welcoming message.

Bloomberg says the U.S. is "pushing people that other countries want away from our shores." He said on ABC's "Good Morning America" that an overly restrictive immigration policy discourages people who can create work with an entrepreneurial spirit.

Bloomberg said, "If I were the president working with Congress, I would give a green card to anybody from around this world who wants to come here, create a business. They keep the green card as long as they employed, let's say, 10 or more workers."


Great idea Mayor Jewberg. Let's just open the borders and let everyone in! Bloomberg's assinine statement just goes to prove that the Jews are out to destroy European culture and society by polluting it with Mud elements. The last thing we need in this recession is more immigrants competing with us for jobs.

As to them starting businesses, how in the hell are these Turd Worlders going to come up with the money to start their own businesses? I'll tell you how. They'll get free business grants and no interest loans that are unavailable to natural born Americans. They get their own business free of charge, and because we can't, we'll end up working for foreigners in our own land!

Rather than give these grants and loans to immigrants, which would indeed stimulate the economy, as Bloomberg implied, the government should give that money to us so we can start the businesses and employ the immigrants. I'd of course like to completely bring a halt to all non-White immigration, but if we have to allow Muds to immigrate, they should be working for us, rather than the other way around.

Monday, July 12, 2010

The Jews Don't Control Our Universities. It's All A Coincidence - NOT!

Six out of eight Ivy League universities in recent years have had Jewish presidents. There are Jewish presidents now at dozens of major institutions, usually the most popular ones. This list does not include the professors and instructors, of which 48% are Jewish. These Kike bastards are very efficiently indoctrinating our young people into their way of thinking. With this and movies and TV, it's no wonder the White race is slipping. The Jews are quite expert at brainwashing our kids into assisting in the destruction of their own race. What's really insidious is that their students aren't even aware that they're being used as tools of their own self-destruction. In a way, it's kind of like when Muslim extremists brainwash one of their own into going on a suicide bombing mission. At least these Ragheads know they're being asked to die. Our kids have no idea that they are being used this way. This is one of the messages that the Aryan Nations is trying to get out. Hopefully, enough people will listen before it's too late.

1 Harvard University,
President: Lawrence Summers (replaced Neil Rudenstine)

.2 Yale University,
President: Richard L. Levin

.3 Princeton University,
President: Harvey Shapiro stepped down after 12 years)

.4 Dartmouth College,
President: James O. Freedman

.5 Cornell University,
President: Jeffrey Lehman

.6 University of Pennsylvania,
President: Judith Rodin

.7 Northwestern University,
President: Henry Bienen,

.8 University of California,
President: Richard Atkinson

.9 Stanford University,
Chairman of the Board: Isaac Stein

.10 Caltech,
President: David Baltimore

.11 Carnegie Mellon University,
President: Jared L. Cohon

.12 West Chester University,
President: Madeleine Wing Adler

Sunday, July 11, 2010

And The Libertards Say The Jews Don't Control The World's Financial Markets!

Jewish bankers, fund managers, head Financial institution (past & present):

There are hundreds in this list. Here are 20 of the more famous ones.

.1 Alan Greenspan -- ex Federal Reserves Chairman

.2 Sir James Goldsmith -- financier and banker (a Knight, if you can believe it)

.3 George Soros -- fund manager

.4 Sandy Weill -- ex CEO of Citigroup

.5 Edmond Safra -- founder of Republic Bank

.6 Paul Warburg -- Founder of the Federal Reserve Banking System

.7 Nickolas J. Neubauer -- Chairman --The Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT),

.8 Robert Rubin -- Former Secretary of the U.S. Treasury

.9 Michael Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg,
.10 Steven Cohen, billionaire founder of SAC Capital Management

.11 Marcus Goldman & Samuel Sachs, founders of Goldman Sachs

.12 Carl Icahn, billionaire Investments Takeovers

.13 Charles H. Fa,7 Frederick W. Schoenhut
chairman New York Board of Trade

.14 Henry Kravis, philanthropist co-founder of KKR

.15 Edward Lampert, billionaire founder of ESL Investments

.16 Henry, Emanuel & Mayer Lehman, founders of Lehman Brothers

.17 Norma Lerner, Randolph Lerner, & Nancy Lerner Beck,
billionaire co-owners of MBNA Financial

.18 Leo Melamed, founder of the International Monetary Market

.19 Michael Milken, junk bond king

.20 James D. Wolfensohn, president World bank. Wolfensohn is connected to the
Rothschild empire. Gee, what a surprise.


This is just a small sample of the hundrends of examples I found. Click on the link above or paste it, and you can see the complete list. It really an informative site. You can also get lists of Jews in the entertainment industry, legal industry, education, real estate, and government. I suppose that the Libertards would tell us that it's all just a coincidence that the Jews form a disproportionate percentage in these fields. Coincidence my White ass!

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Filing For November Elections Begins On July 12

Comrades, I just read in my local paper that filing for city and county elections here in San Bernardino County begins Monday, July 12, and ends Friday, August 9. Now these dates may not be the same throughout the country, but they should be similar. I still think it may be too soon for Aryan Nations to run for office. I believe it would be better to wait for the next elections because most of us know very little about the how's and why's of things. We need time to educate ourselves. However, there may be some of us who have either already done their homework, or have even tried running for office previously. If you are one of these, then now's the time to move.

If any of our members decide to try and run for something, we will give them all the support we can. Just take my advice, and choose a realistic goal. You'll unlikely be able to win the governorship, nor state senate or assembly. Stick to local offices. City and County things. It's not as glamourous and exciting, but more realistic. Like a business major who just graduated from college, we can't start on the board of directors. We must start low, and work our way up. That's the only way we can succeed in the electoral process. Non-partisan offices are our best bet. That's offices where your political party affiliation is irrelevant. Mayor, city council, county clerk, county registrar of voters, and the like.

I also advise that we neither advertise, nor hide who and what we are. We just run for a non-partisan office. If we win, and if we do a good job, and then people find out that we are National Socialists, they may say, "Hey, this guy is some kind of Nazi, yet I don't see the Swastika flying over city hall, or the police rounding up minorities, or SS troops goose-stepping through town. He seems to be doing a good job. Maybe we were wrong about them all along."

Maybe some will think that, but not most. Some will cry for immediate impeachment. But you can't impeach someone soley on his political affiliation. As long as you do your job adequately, they're stuck with you until your term is over. But maybe by then, enough people will come around for you to get a second term, or even a higher office. We must never take giant steps, unless we want to fall flat on our faces like John Taylor Bowles did when he ran for president. Now I'm not taking a nasty shot at JT. All I'm saying is he took a giant step, and fell. Next time, I'm sure he'll take a smaller step. Might I suggest County clerk, a seat on the zoning board, or maybe even city council, if he thinks he has enough support. I don't really know what the people of Laurens think of him, but he could have a chance. You never know unless you try.

Remember, most offices require candidates to be at least 21 years old, and some may require them to be older. To run for the U.S. Congress, you have to be at least 25. But like I said, Congress is unrealistic at the present. Check to make certain you're eligible to run. If you're 35 or older, you meet the age requirement for everything.

I'd also like to see Director Mullet run for something. Perhaps a county office. I think Gordon Young should also consider running. If not this year, then 2012, like me. The same for our other leaders. I'll probably wait until 2012, but I'm definitely going to go down to the registrar's office and do some checking right after I get back from Pulaski. I'll have about 16 days to decide by then. Once I do some homework, I'll be in a better position to make such an important decision. We'll see. Like I said, you never know until you try! Hail Victory!

Friday, July 9, 2010

Latino and conservative groups clash over student's "Mexico" t-shirt

Michael J. Sorba, Staff Writer
Posted: 07/07/2010 06:35:17 PM PDT

BIG BEAR LAKE, CA. - A "Mexico" t-shirt worn to support the county's World Cup soccer team has created a full-blown controversy in the Bear Valley Unified School District.

The mother of the girl who wore the shirt to Big Bear Middle School on June 11 alleges her seventh-grade daughter's teacher took offense to the shirt and accused her of being an illegal immigrant in front of the class.

Diana Aviles says she and her daughter are U.S. citizens. The teacher later apologized.

The incident has erupted into a battle between anti-illegal immigration activists and Latino groups who say the teacher's alleged behavior is an example of racism and racial profiling.

At the district's Board of Trustees meeting Wednesday, members of the conservative activist's group We The People were expected to speak during public comment. The group opposes illegal immigration and employers who hire and exploit illegal aliens, according to a statement on its Web site.

Ray Herrera, the group's founder, president and spokesman, says he believes Aviles is an illegal immigrant granted amnesty. He says she's trying to push a "Mexican agenda" on Americans. She allowed her daughter to attend school with the shirt and owns a Mexican restaurant in Big Bear City that displays a Mexican flag, which Herrera describes as "antagonistic."

Aviles said it's not outrageous to have a Mexican flag in a Mexican restaurant. The flag has been taken down because of harassment,
Advertisement she said. When the Mexican flag was up, she said the American flag was larger and displayed higher.

"I'm not pushing anything political," Aviles said. "I had a small Mexican flag and a huge American flag, only for the reason that I'm a Mexican-American restaurant. I don't like people to say I'm not American. This is my country."

Herrera said Latino groups such as The League of United Latin American Citizens have publicly called the incident an example of racial profiling so it can be cited during it's fight against Arizona's SB 1070 law, which requires police in the state to check the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants.

"They've been campaigning throughout the county on behalf of illegal immigrants," Herrera said. "This is just a case where they think they've found another poster child - another racial profiling story."

Leroy Martinez, vice president of LULAC Council 3163, said he decided to attend the meeting after he heard the group planned to speak.

"If (Herrera) wants to turn this into an immigration issue that's his problem," Martinez said. "The reality is you have an American student who was profiled."

A statement from the district says it's investigating allegations from a student that a teacher made racist remarks against her during a class. The statement then says the district will not comment on the findings of the investigation until it's completed.

Aviles says the teacher should be fired. She wants her daughter to be moved to another class if the teacher remains at the school.

"I'm angry," Aviles said. "Why should it be turned into a political thing when this is about a child who is being ridiculed? That teacher showed hatred in the class."

The teacher's apology is enough and the investigation should be dropped so the matter doesn't distract students, Herrera said., 909-386-3872


Although I most certainly do believe that if Mexicans think Mexico is so great, they should go back. In the case of this Mexican restaurant, people's anger over the Mexican flag is misplaced. I've seen Italian restaurants displaying the Italian flag, and I know of a sushi restaurant that displays the Japanese flag. I once went to a German restaurant where they flew the German flag. At the Danish style town of Solvang, Ca., you can see the Danish Flag. However, in most cases, the American flag is also flown, and in a higher position than any other, as it should be.

Now I wrote a different comment when I posted this on our forum yesterday, but after having a day to think about it, I realised I was too harsh. Mexicans do have a tendency to abuse the right to fly flags other than that of the United States. They fly the Mexican flag higher than ours, or they don't bother to fly ours at all - especially in the case of illegals. However, I don't think it's inappropriate to fly a foreign flag at a restaurant that sells the food of that country, as long as the American flag is also flown and at a higher position, as required by law.

I'm not a big fan of Mexican food, but I've been known to eat a burrito every now and again. I enjoy pizza. Sushi - yuk! But to each his own. I generally prefer American style food, but every now and again it's nice to go out for Chinese food, or to the 'Olive Garden', or wherever. I think it's part of the decore. It adds to the ambience - as long as the American Flag is present, and the most prominent.

As to the t-shirt, many Mexicans are big soccer fans. Nothing wrong with that in and of itself. I can't stand the sport, but that's just my taste. However, this girl calls herself an American. America has several soccer teams of its own. If she really is an American, she should be rooting for our country, and not some foreign team. Show your patriotism. Buy American, root American!

Thursday, July 8, 2010

The Feds File Suit Against Arizona's Anti-Illegal Immigration Law - It Begins!

James Rufus Koren, Staff Writer
Posted: 07/06/2010 08:56:14 PM PDT

The U.S. Department of Justice is suing Arizona over the state's new immigration law, known as S.B. 1070.

The long-expected lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the federal district court of Arizona, asks a judge to overturn the controversial law, which requires Arizona law-enforcement officers to check the immigration status of people they suspect might be in the country illegally.

Although opponents have questioned whether the law violates civil rights - many are concerned that police are more likely to be suspicious of Latinos and other non-whites - the suit mainly argues that the federal government, not any individual state, is responsible for enforcing immigration law.

"Arizonans are understandably frustrated with illegal immigration, and the federal government has a responsibility to comprehensively address those concerns," Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement Tuesday. "Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility. Seeking to address the issue through a patchwork of state laws will only create more problems than it solves."

The suit holds that, "Although states may exercise their police power in a manner that has an incidental or indirect effect on aliens, a state may not establish its own immigration policy."

Rep. Joe Baca, D-San Bernardino, called S.B. 1070 "un-American" and "a severe setback to our liberties."

"It's right for them to sue Arizona," Baca said. "Everybody must
follow the Constitution."

He, like Holder, said leaving individual states to create immigration law would be disastrous.

"Immigration is a problem that can only be solved by a comprehensive solution," Baca said. "There should be a standard across the U.S."

Baca said he believes S.B. 1070 will be overturned.

Rep. Gary Miller, R-Brea, called the lawsuit baseless.

"This lawsuit reveals the Obama administration's contempt for immigration laws, the people of Arizona, and for the majority of the American people who support Arizona's efforts to reduce human smuggling, drug trafficking and illegal immigration," he said in a statement. "Arizona has taken a reasonable and constitutional approach to dealing with a problem that has been ignored - and exacerbated - by the Obama administration."

Tim Donnelly, a former Minuteman who is running for the 59th District Assembly seat, said Arizona has a right to enact its own immigration laws because the federal government hasn't protected the state from what he calls an invasion of illegal immigrants.

He said most Americans, regardless of party affiliation, agree with the Arizona law.

He said immigration will likely be the undoing of the Obama presidency.

"Obama is not a king," Donnelly said. "He serves at the will of the people. The people can throw him out in the next election and probably will."

Assemblyman Curt Hagman, R-Chino Hills, said the federal government has left states with few options but to fend for themselves, especially as states face fiscal crises while paying for the effects of illegal immigration.

"They're telling us we have to take care of all these people because they're not going to enforce the law," Hagman said. "That leaves us holding the bag, with billions and billions in costs."

Hagman said the Obama administration should be focused on securing U.S. borders, not on "suing American citizens."

That's a common, though not unanimous, view in the Republican Party.

Assemblyman Anthony Adams, R-Claremont, the man Donnelly wants to replace, said he, too, wants the federal government to enforce current laws, but he also said S.B. 1070 probably isn't constitutional.

"I'm a huge states' rights guy," Adams said. "But the Constitution is explicitly clear that immigration is solely under the federal government's purview."

He said Arizona lawmakers have a right to be frustrated, but they don't have the right to enforce federal law on their own. A better tactic, he said, would be for Arizona voters to put pressure on federal lawmakers.

"It's not acceptable to allow the federal government to do nothing," Adams said. "But the appropriate response is to kick out complacent politicians at the federal level. We should be holding our federal politicians' feet to the fire for their lack of action."


Well, we were expecting this, and here it is. If I were Gov. Brewer, I wouldn't even send a lawyer to Federal court. I'd ignore the whole thing, and enforce the law anyway. I'd also remind The Feds that she is the Commander-In-Chief of the Arizona National Guard.


BTW, it greatly infuriates and galls me, but unfortunately I just happen to live in Joe Baca's Congressional District. In fact, he has his office in the same building as that liberal shrew, Senator Barbara Boxer. Local conservatives refer to the building as, "The Kalifornia Kremlin."

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Lies Now Abound... What Really Happened To Jim Ramm?

The following statement was written by Jim Ramm on the Aryan Nations Forum. Jim wants to set the record straight about what has become of him.

Perhaps many of you have noticed my absence from this forum. I would like to clear up some misconceptions. My original goal upon selling the Zog's Nightmare website was to retire from the movement while allowing another group to continue promoting the information. But the plan failed because The NSALP dissolved and the websites and forum needed another home. Paul, from the Aryan Nations, agreed to take the new, completely redesigned and copyright-free version Zog's Nightmare (along with Shitskin) under his wing. The sites, along with my services to create the AN forum were all donated to the Aryan Nations. I never joined the AN, ANP or any other organization, and I never started my own organization... all because I still planned on retiring from the movement.

Why retire? Don't get me wrong, I still deeply loathe non-whites but have very little free time available for posting on the internet, going to rallies or other activities. The little free time I have is now consumed with various day to day responsibilities.

Certain less than honorable mini-fuhrer's have now been targeting me online with outrageous lies and libel. They are enraged because someone did the research and discovered that this person is married to a woman who was married to a nigger for nine years. She even has a mixed-race mistake. This person created a blog at: publishing all the data exposing race-treason. This evidence has caused many in this leader's organization to resign, unable to stomach the idea of their mini-fuhrer married to race-mixer. I have examined the evidence and the results are inescapable: Joanna Schoep was married to a nigger for nine years.

Frankly, I have been lied about many times before and this isn't the first. As usual no evidence is presented to support the outlandish statements made by a man who is without honor. indirectly.html

Much thanks to those whom see through the lies and have enough common sense to ignore the nonsense.


I myself have been the victim of scurrilous lies, both on two different blogs, and probably other places I haven't found out about yet. It doesn't feel good. But you have to get used to it if you're going to be a leader in the movement. I'm sure Jim has done just that, but it still sucks. Having someone impersonate you is an entirely different matter. I'm not sure if anyone has impersonated me at this time, but it would be a major violation. It's sort of like identity theft. The people who do things like that are the lowest kind of scum. If we take the high road every time something like that happens, most will realise the truth. Those that don't are either idiots, or lowlifes - or both, and I could care less what those turds think anyway. But it still kind of sucks either way.